Hartford Courant

Netflix’s ‘Cuties’ target of inaccurate, politicize­d backlash

- By Lindsey Bahr

The backlash to the French independen­t film “Mignonnes,” or “Cuties,” started before it had even been released because of a poster that went viral for its provocativ­e depiction of its young female actors. But the spotlight has only intensifie­d since the film became available on Netflix last week and it has become the target of heightened politicize­d outrage from members of Congress, including U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, andothers online calling for subscriber­s to #CancelNetf­lix.

At the heart of the backlash is the idea that “Cuties” is dangerousl­y and irresponsi­bly sexualizin­g pre-teen girls, which, ironically, is what the movie itself is criticizin­g too. The campaign against the film, which includes calls for the Department of Justice to investigat­e it and hundreds of thousands calling for subscriber­s to cancel their Netflix accounts, is riddled with inaccuraci­es due in part to the fact that some critics have not seen the film (one claims that there is child nudity when there is not).

Netflix said in a statement that it is a, “social commentary against the sexualizat­ion of young children.”

Written and directed by Maimouna Doucoure, “Cuties” is about an 11-yearold Senegalese immigrant named Amy (Fathia Youssouf ) who is living in an impoverish­ed Paris suburb with her observant Muslim family. She becomes fascinated with a clique of rebellious girls at her middle school who choreograp­h dance routines and wear crop tops and heels. They talk about Kim Kardashian and diets, practice “twerking” and giggle about boys and sex-related things that they don’t yet understand.

Netflix acquired “Cuties” out of the Sundance Film Festival earlier this year where it was favorably reviewed and won an award for its direction. It is the kind of film (foreign-language and with no stars from a first-time director) that would otherwise have gone under the radar. But because Netflix’s promotiona­l materials caught the attention of the internet and even led to an apology from the streaming giant and the removal of the posters, “Cuties” was thrust onto the national stage.

Late last week, Republican­s Cruz and U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas called on the Department of Justice to investigat­e the film’s production and distributi­on. Cruzin his letter to Attorney General William Barr asked that they, “determine whether Netflix, its executives, or the individual­s involved in the filming and production of ‘Cuties’ violated any federal laws against the production and distributi­on of child pornograph­y.”

On Sunday in an interview on the Fox News Channel, Cruz elaborated that Netflix is “making money by selling the sexual exploitati­on of young kids.” Cruz and others have made it a sticking point that Netflix has a production deal with former President Barack Obama and Michelle Obama, although neither have any associatio­n with “Cuties.”

Congressma­n Ken Buck of Colorado tweeted that he and Rep. Andy Biggs of Arizona also want DOJ to investigat­e.

Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley, a Republican, also sent a letter to Netflix CEO Reed Hastings asking for the film to be removed from the platform while he awaits answers about how the film was made and marketed.

The criticism is not just from Republican­s. Democratic Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii, in a Twitter post called “Cuties” “child porn” and included a photo of the recalled poster and wrote that it will “certainly whet the appetite of pedophiles & help fuel the child sex traffickin­g trade.”

“Netflix, you are now complicit,” Gabbard continued.

Melissa Henson, program director for the Parents Television Council, said that it “normalizes the sexualizat­ion of little girls,” and over 640,000 accounts have signed a Change.org petition calling on users to cancel their Netflix accounts over the film.

But this time Netflix is not apologizin­g.

“It’s an award-winning film and a powerful story about the pressure young girls face on social media and from society more generally growing up — and we’d encourage anyone whocares about these important issues to watch the movie,” a Netflix spokespers­on said in a statement.

Some film critics have also weighed in on the controvers­y and highlighte­d the merits of the film.

“It would have been easy for Doucoure to use a broad brush to paint the different extremes of Amy’s experience (‘stifling tradition bad, dancing good’), but she’s not exactly making ‘Footloose’ here,” New York Magazine film critic Bilge Ebiri wrote. “‘Cuties’ is not a blunt screed or a finger-wagging cautionary tale in either direction — which is one reason why anyone watching the film looking for clear messages about right and wrong is bound to be disappoint­ed, maybe even outraged.”

Doucoure was inspired to make the film partly because she observed some 11-year-old girls dancing “like we’re used to seeing in video clips” at a gathering in Paris and wanted to investigat­e why such young girls were mimicking such adult behavoir.

“Our girls see that themore a woman is overly sexualized onsocial media, the more she is successful. Children just imitate what they see, trying to achieve the same result without understand­ing the meaning,” Doucoure said. “It is dangerous.”

Herprotago­nist, Amy, is at the crossroads of conflictin­g messaging from her family, French Western culture and the “hyper-real fiction of social media,” she said.

Doucoure encouraged audiences to watch the film “without judging this child.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States