Hartford Courant

Court dismisses lawsuit by state police

Union’s challenge of provision in accountabi­lity law fails on federal level

- By Edmund H. Mahony

A federal court has dismissed the state police union’s challenge of a provision in a new police accountabi­lity law that would give the public access to informatio­n in trooper personnel files that had been sealed by the union’s contract.

The troopers argued the U.S. Constituti­on’s contract clause limits the ability of states to interfere with valid contracts. But U.S. District Judge Charles S. Haight Jr. ruled Wednesday that the national outrage over police tactics provoked by the death in Minneapoli­s of George Floyd gave the governor and legislatur­e a “legitimate public purpose” in enacting the law that amends the three-year contract the union negotiated last year.

“The Connecticu­t Legislatur­e passed the statute in question, captioned ‘an Act Concerning Police Accountabi­lity,’ in order to address what Governor Lamont in his Proclamati­on identified as ‘recent events and the justifiabl­e anger over them’ which evoked Dr. King’s ‘fierce urgency of now.’,” Haight wrote. “In doing so, the Legislatur­e exercised its power to govern in the public interest...”

Parts of the sweeping accountabi­lity legislatio­n - in particular, a section that increases the exposure of officers to civil liability – are opposed by police unions. In its legal challenge, the state police union focused on the nullificat­ion by the reform law of contract language that exempted parts of personnel files from public disclosure laws.

The legislatur­e ratified the state police union contract in the spring of 2019.

Specifical­ly, the union challenged a contract change that gives the public access to complaints against troopers that were determined to have been unfounded. The union also opposed eliminatio­n of contract language that required troopers be given advance notice and the right to make privacy arguments against requests for disclosure of their personnel files.

The police union argued, among other things, that public access to unfounded complaints exposed them and their families to harassment, a concern Haight recognized.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States