Hartford Courant

Religious exemption bill headed for a vote

- By Jenna Carlesso CT Mirror Reporter Kasturi Pananjady contribute­d to this story. Jenna Carlesso and Kasturi Pananjady are reporters for The Connecticu­t Mirror (http://www. ctmirror.org). Copyright 2021 © The Connecticu­t Mirror.

For the third year in a row, legislator­s are hoping to advance — and ultimately adopt — a bill that would remove Connecticu­t’s religious exemption from mandatory school vaccinatio­ns. The proposal is expected to come up for a vote in the legislatur­e’s public health committee this week.

In 2019, Democratic lawmakers floated the proposal halfway through the regular session, calling press conference­s, scheduling a public hearing and soliciting input from the state’s health department even though no bill was drafted. The measure did not come up for a vote in either chamber.

Last year, the public health committee called a hearing on the religious exemption bill just two weeks into the session, drawing hundreds of people, many of them opposed to the measure. Members voted to send the bill to the House floor just days later, but the session wassuspend­edsoonafte­r, leaving the proposal in limbo.

On Feb. 16, legislator­s held their third public hearing on the plan. Although the health committee has until April 7 to advance the bill, a vote is expected Wednesday. Here’s what’s in the controvers­ial proposal:

What is the religious exemption?: The Connecticu­t General Assembly passed a bill in 1959 making certain vaccines mandatory for children attending school. In it, they included anexemptio­nfor people whoobject to the immunizati­ons based on religious beliefs. The state was in the midst of a polio epidemic, andlawmake­rs called the measure a necessary step in protecting children. The religious exemption, along with the medical exemption, has been onthe books ever since.

Eachyear, parents of school-aged children can fill out a form or write a letter to their child’s school nurse or principal saying they are refraining from vaccinatio­n on religious grounds. Parents must do this before a child enters kindergart­en andagain before seventh grade, whensomead­ditional immunizati­ons are required.

If the bill succeeds, when would the exemption go away?:

The exemption would be removed starting Sept. 1, 2022. That means families could continue claiming it during the 2021-22 school year, but not during the 202223 school year or beyond that.

The bill does not force children to be immunized. It bars unvaccinat­ed children (whodo not qualify for a medical exemption) from enrolling in school.

As currently drafted, the bill allows children in seventh grade and higher to continue refusing mandatory vaccines for religious reasons. Anyone in grades six or under would no longer be eligible, as would children of any age entering the school system in the future.

Legislator­s said the bill maybeamend­edto allow all students currently enrolled in school to keep claiming the exemption. In that case, only newchildre­n entering school or day care would be prohibited from refusing vaccines based on their religious beliefs. Negotiatio­ns about the language are ongoing.

Would anyone still be able to claim it?: How many children claim the religious exemption?:

In the 2019-20 school year, the most recent data available, 8,328 children — across all grade levels — had claimed the exemption. That’s up from 7,782 in 2018-19,

and 7,042 in 2017-18.

Is the COVID-19 vaccine on the state’s list of mandatory immunizati­ons?: No. Currently, only people 16 andolder are eligible to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Modernaand­Pfizerare both testing their shots in youngchild­ren, but there are no coronaviru­s vaccines approved for kids younger than 16. Even when the immunizati­on is approved for younger children, it’s unclear if it will be added to the state’s list of mandatory vaccines.

What vaccines are on Connecticu­t’s list of mandatory immunizati­ons?:

Mandatory immunizati­ons include measles, mumps and rubella; diphtheria; pertussis (whooping cough); tetanus; poliomyeli­tis; and haemophilu­s influenzae type B, an infection that can lead to bacterial meningitis. The bill does leave the door open for the state health commission­er to addmorereq­uired vaccines, though health officials have said they tailor their mandates to federal guidelines.

Who’sin favorandwh­o’s opposed?: Parents who have claimed the exemption for their children say the bill infringes on their religious freedom. Some have questioned how they wouldholdd­ownajoband­home-school their kids at the same time. Others have argued the bill woulddivid­e families — allowing older siblings (seventh grade and above) to stay in school while younger unvaccinat­ed children would no longer be able to attend.

Proponents say they are concerned about immunocomp­romisedchi­ldren, whocannot be vaccinated because of allergies or other medical reasons. As the number of students claiming the religious exemption has risen in recent years, they said, those medically compromise­d children are more at risk.

“We’ve been hearing from many parents of immunocomp­romised children who are terrified at the prospect of sending their children to school in a situation where they may not besafe,” Senate President Pro TemMartin Looney said in 2019.

What else is in the bill?: The measure requires the public health commission­er to annually release school-by-school vaccinatio­n rates.

It also includes a provision that wouldhelp parents get access to the vaccines, even if they cannot afford them. In cases where parents are unable to pay for a vaccine, the town or city they live in would cover the expense.

The bill also calls for the formation of an advisory committee to review Connecticu­t’s vaccine program, including exemption policies and instances in which families request medical exemptions, and issue recommenda­tions.

If the proposal clears the health committee, where will it go next?:

There are two identical measures under considerat­ion that would remove the religious exemption — one is a House bill and one a Senate bill. Members of the public health committee say they’re still debating which version will come up for a vote, or whether they’ll vote out both to give leaders in the House and Senate the decision on which chamber should take it up first.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States