Hartford Courant

Pelosi calls GOP’S bluff on Jan. 6 committee

- By E.J. Dionne Jr. E.J. Dionne Jr. writes about politics for The Washington Post.

WASHINGTON — It’s past time to recognize the disqualify­ing extremism of the Trump-era Republican Party. Politics as usual just isn’t possible anymore. Pretending that today’s GOP is the same Grand Old Party of even a decade ago is dysfunctio­nal and misleading.

That’s the message House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-calif., sent on Wednesday when she rejected two of Republican House Minority Leader Kevin Mccarthy’s five appointees to the select committee to investigat­e the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

Pelosi freely admitted that her decision to turn back minority-party appointees to a committee — in this case, Reps. Jim Banks, R-ind., and Jim Jordan, R-ohio — is “unpreceden­ted,” but she noted that the attacks on the Capitol were unpreceden­ted too.

Naturally, Mccarthy howled. He vowed to pull back his other nominees, claiming that the panel had lost “all legitimacy and credibilit­y” and that Republican­s would “pursue our own investigat­ion of the facts.”

We can look forward with great excitement as to how Mccarthy and his colleagues choose to define “facts.” In the Trump era, facts have not been one of the strong suits of the former president’s party.

Indeed, Banks and Jordan should be seen as having disqualifi­ed themselves. From the start, Banks rejected the idea that the Jan. 6 attack aimed at overturnin­g the results of a free election was worth investigat­ing as a discretely dangerous act.

He issued a whatabouti­sm-on-steroids statement on Monday declaring that the committee should study not only “the January 6 riot” but also “the hundreds of violent political riots last summer when many more innocent Americans and law-enforcemen­t officers were attacked.”

Hey, why stop there? Banks’s goal was clearly to dilute and undercut the committee’s core purpose, so why not also propose investigat­ing why Giannis Antetokoun­mpo is such an awesome basketball player or whether Major League Baseball should adopt my colleague George Will’s proposed reforms to its rules?

As for Jordan, he, like Banks, supported Donald Trump’s false claims of election fraud. He is a famous political bombthrowe­r and derided the committee to which he was appointed as “Impeachmen­t Round 3,” an effort to “go after President Trump.”

You can’t say that Pelosi and the Democrats didn’t try to have a fair investigat­ion, but their plan to create a bipartisan, independen­t commission was shot down by Republican­s, many of whom are plainly uneasy with a balanced inquiry. God forbid that it delve into Trump’s role in the violent insurrecti­on and possibly also into the behavior of Republican members of Congress themselves.

By rejecting the sabotage-minded duo, Pelosi drew a thick line under a central reality of our politics: It is no longer possible to proceed normally when Republican­s answer to a leader and his loyal base for whom reality is an inconvenie­nce, fairly counted elections are a hindrance and outright lies are an accepted currency of politics.

As a CBS News-yougov poll demonstrat­ed last week, Trump Republican­s live in a world of their own when it comes to Jan. 6.

The survey found that while 67% of Americans overall said the attack on the Capitol was an attempt to overturn the election, only 32% of Trump voters said this. Among all Americans, 56% called the events an insurrecti­on; only 20% of Trump voters did. And while only 29% of all polled saw the attack as an act of “patriotism,” fully 51% of Trump voters cast it that way.

Will Republican­s denounce any findings offered by a select committee with only Pelosi appointees — including, by the way, GOP Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming? Sure. But Mccarthy and his allies would have done that anyway. At least a panel without disrupters can systematic­ally pursue the truth and follow the evidence. Old-fashioned it may be, but let’s allow its conclusion­s to stand or fall on the basis of their accuracy and fidelity to the known facts.

And if Mccarthy actually cares about a fair process, he should allow the other three Republican­s Pelosi welcomed — Reps. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Kelly Armstrong of North Dakota and Troy E. Nehls of Texas — to join the committee and add two more. Or the three can ignore Mccarthy and simply volunteer to serve.

It’s sad that matters have come to this: Instead of joining across party lines to get to the bottom of a violent attack on our democratic process, lawmakers are treating an insurrecti­on as a partisan matter. Pelosi did not cause this. Trump and his enablers did.

To the surprise of many, Pelosi abandoned convention. With one dramatic act, she called out the extremists and exposed our political dysfunctio­n. Whatever shortrun grief she might take for doing so will be worth it for the lesson she has offered.

 ?? J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP ?? Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-calif., meets with reporters at the Capitol in Washington on Thursday. Pelosi discussed her reasons for rejecting two Republican­s chosen by House GOP leader Kevin Mccarthy to be on the committee investigat­ing the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrecti­on.
J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-calif., meets with reporters at the Capitol in Washington on Thursday. Pelosi discussed her reasons for rejecting two Republican­s chosen by House GOP leader Kevin Mccarthy to be on the committee investigat­ing the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrecti­on.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States