Hartford Courant

Biden, Iraqi PM to meet

Prime minister says US combat troops not needed vs. IS

- By Qassim Abdul-zahra and Samya Kullab

Prime minister says U.S. troops not needed against Islamic State.

BAGHDAD — Iraq’s prime minister says his country no longer requires American combat troops to fight the Islamic State group, but a formal time frame for their redeployme­nt will depend on the outcome of talks with U.S. officials this week.

Mustafa al-kadhimi said Iraq will still ask for U.S. training and military intelligen­ce gathering. His comments came ahead of a planned trip to Washington, where he’s scheduled to meet with President Joe Biden on Monday for a fourth round of strategic talks.

“There is no need for any foreign combat forces on Iraqi soil,” said al-kadhimi, falling short of announcing a deadline for a U.S. troop departure. Iraq’s security forces and army are capable of defending the country without U.s.-led coalition troops, he said.

But al-kadhimi said any withdrawal schedule would be based on the needs of Iraqi forces, who have shown themselves capable in the last year of conducting independen­t anti-is missions.

“The war against IS and the readiness of our forces requires a special timetable, and this depends on the negotiatio­ns that we will conduct in Washington,” he said.

The U.S. and Iraq agreed in April that the U.S. transition to a train-and-advise mission meant the U.S. combat role would end but they didn’t settle on a timetable for completing that transition. In Monday’s meeting at the White House, the two leaders are expected to specify a timeline, possibly by the end of this year.

The U.S. troop presence has stood at about 2,500 since late last year when former President Donald Trump ordered a reduction from 3,000.

The U.S. mission of training and advising Iraqi forces has its most recent origins in former President Barack Obama’s decision in 2014 to send troops back to Iraq. The move was made in response to the Islamic State group’s takeover of large portions of western and northern Iraq and a collapse of Iraqi security forces that appeared to threaten Baghdad. Obama had fully withdrawn U.S. forces from Iraq in 2011, eight years after the U.S. invasion.

“What we want from the U.S. presence in Iraq is to support our forces in training and developing their efficiency and capabiliti­es, and in security cooperatio­n,” al-kadhimi said.

The Washington trip comes as the premier’s administra­tion has faced one setback after another, seriously underminin­g public confidence. Ongoing missile attacks by militia groups have underscore­d the limits of the state to prevent them and several devastatin­g hospital fires amid soaring coronaviru­s cases have left dozens dead.

Meanwhile, early federal elections, in line with a promise al-kadhimi made when he assumed office in May 2020, are less than three months away.

Chief on the agenda in Washington, however, is the future of American-led coalition forces in Iraq.

Iraq declared victory over IS in late 2017 after a ruinous and bloody war. The continued presence of American troops has become a polarizing issue among Iraq’s political class since the U.s.-directed drone strike that killed powerful Iranian general Qassim Soleimani and Iraqi militia commander Abu Mahdi al-muhandis on Iraqi soil last year.

To quell the threat of widespread instabilit­y following the targeted killings, the U.S. and Iraq have held at least three rounds of strategic talks centering on Iraq’s military needs in the ongoing fight against IS and to formalize a timeline for withdrawal.

Four years since their territoria­l defeat, IS militants are still able to launch attacks in the capital and roam the country’s rugged northern region. Last week, a suicide bomber killed 30 people in a busy Baghdad marketplac­e. That attack was later claimed by IS.

Al-kadhimi has faced significan­t pressure from mainly Shiite political parties to announce a timeline for a U.S. troop withdrawal. Ongoing rocket and, more recently, drone attacks targeting the American military presence have also heaped pressure on the government. They are widely believed to be perpetrate­d by Iran-aligned Iraqi militia groups.

An announceme­nt that combat troops will withdraw might serve to placate Shiite parties but will have little impact on the ground: The coalition’s combat mission ended effectivel­y in November when the Pentagon reduced U.S. troops in the country to 2,500, according to Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein. Shiite parties have said they do not object to trainers or advisors who may remain as part of the coalition.

U.S. and coalition officials have maintained that U.S. troops are no longer accompanyi­ng Iraqi forces on ground missions and that coalition assistance is limited to intelligen­ce gathering and surveillan­ce and the deployment of advanced military technologi­es. Iraqi military officials have stressed they still need this support going forward.

“Iraq has a set of American weapons that need maintenanc­e and training. We will ask the American side to continue to support our forces and develop our capabiliti­es,” al-kadhimi said.

 ?? KHALID MOHAMMED/AP ?? Prime Minister Mustafa al-kadhimi, right, will be in Washington this week to discuss a timetable for U.S. troops to transition away from a combat role in Iraq.
KHALID MOHAMMED/AP Prime Minister Mustafa al-kadhimi, right, will be in Washington this week to discuss a timetable for U.S. troops to transition away from a combat role in Iraq.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States