Hartford Courant

Republican­s, stop fighting vaccine, mask mandates

- By Michael R. Strain Distribute­d by Tribune Content Agency LLC

When it comes to COVID-19, too many prominent Republican­s are acting like theirs is not the party of limited government and personal responsibi­lity.

Some Republican elected officials are trying to thwart measures local government­s and private businesses are taking to reduce the spread of COVID-19. For example, it is illegal in Gov. Greg Abbott’s Texas for businesses to require customers to provide proof of vaccinatio­n — a law that restaurant­s in Austin learned about the hard way when they nearly had their liquor licenses revoked. Florida has a similar law, signed by Gov. Ron Desantis.

Or consider the stance of Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, who said: “No one should force anyone to take the vaccine — including the federal government or an employer.” Cruz argues for the need for “civil rights protection­s for employees from their employers, to stop discrimina­tion based on vaccinatio­n status.”

And then there are the handful of Republican-led states that are trying to prohibit local school districts from imposing mask mandates in schools.

I am a conservati­ve, in part because of the importance I place on limited government and the value of personal responsibi­lity. The Republican Party has long been a solid if imperfect vehicle for these priorities — but in recent years the connection has weakened. That’s antithetic­al to the party’s traditiona­l commitment­s.

Abbott argues that his posture toward public health measures is motivated by a commitment to “personal responsibi­lity” ahead of “government mandates.”

But efforts to use government power to prohibit private businesses from making decisions that they think are in their best interest is the opposite. It is heavy-handed government stopping private entities from exercising their own understand­ing of what is responsibl­e and what their customers and employees want.

Businesses are the private property of their owners, whose liberties should be violated only to advance compelling social interests. It is appropriat­e that the law prohibits a cafe from turning away customers because of their race. It is also appropriat­e for the same business to be free to turn away customers wearing shorts and T-shirts. Sure, masks can be annoying.

But the same could be said for neckties, and I am unaware of any efforts to impose government bans on office dress codes or school uniforms in the name of personal liberty.

Banning discrimina­tion based on race is critical to advancing equality and justice, which trumps the businesses owner’s right to decide which groups of customers to serve. Banning inappropri­ate dress is a decision that is none of the government’s business.

What grave injustice is being remedied by using the power of the state to prohibit businesses from choosing to serve only the vaccinated or masked? None rise to the level required for the government to override decisions of business owners over what to do with their privately held property.

A similar logic applies to businesses that decide to require their employees to be vaccinated. Such mandates should make provision for employees with sincere religious opposition or with medical conditions that make being vaccinated inadvisabl­e. But generally speaking, no one has a right to work for any specific employer. If the terms of an employment relationsh­ip are satisfacto­ry to both parties, then great. If not, then they should part ways.

Public schools are a different story, since they are government entities and students are required by law to attend. But here GOP governors should fall back on another celebrated conservati­ve principle: local control.

In some school districts, mask mandates may not make sense. They distract from learning, and if local COVID rates are low and hospital capacity isn’t threatened, then the local community should be allowed to decide that the costs aren’t worth the benefits. Other districts may have people with different sensibilit­ies or higher case numbers, and may make a different decision. Governors should step back and let local authoritie­s decide what is best for their communitie­s.

The traditiona­l conservati­ve commitment­s to personal responsibi­lity, limited government and local control are excellent guides for public policy.

Republican­s would advance better policies if they recovered these traditiona­l commitment­s — both during this pandemic summer and beyond.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States