Hartford Courant

Let’s have a new gun law for Fourth of July

- Gail Collins Collins is a columnist for The New York Times.

The Fourth of July is coming, and if all goes well — crossing many fingers — before Congress leaves town to celebrate, the House and Senate will have passed the first substantia­l gun safety legislatio­n in nearly 30 years.

Yeah, the last big reform was in 1994. People were watching the pilot episode of “Friends” on TV, Jeff Bezos was founding Amazon and kids were hearing about a great new invention called Playstatio­n.

Chris Murphy was in college, just turning 21. “I bought my first beer legally,” he said in a phone interview Wednesday.

Moving onward and upward, Murphy is now a member of the Senate from Connecticu­t and the lead Democratic negotiator on gun safety legislatio­n.

And there’s actually a real bill. Or at least a bipartisan agreement for what ought to be in a bill.

Our job for today is to decide how we feel about it. Three choices:

A. Awful! They don’t even have a ban on the sale of assault weapons to 18-year-olds.

B. Not great! They keep putting all this power in the hands of the states when we all know how crazy some of the states are.

C. Hey, they’re actually doing something — stop the negativity! Otherwise, you’ll be the kind of perfection­ist nobody wants to be standing next to while grilling holiday hamburgers.

Yeah, I think we ought to go with C.

“No bill I’ve ever been involved in has been perfect,” said John Feinblatt, president of Everytown For Gun Safety, who’s certainly been involved in his share. “But look at the big picture. You’ve got bipartisan support for a gun safety bill.”

Well, 10 Republican senators publicly signed on, which is the number you need to get past the inevitable filibuster motion. That’s 20% of the party’s senators.

But once again, we need to think positive. Murphy told me that in 2012, when a gunman with an assault rifle killed 20 small children and six staff members in his district’s Sandy Hook elementary school, only “one single Republican was willing to sit down and talk” about possible legislatio­n — Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvan­ia.

Ten is better than one. The plan they’ve come up with would make it easier to disarm domestic abusers, provide a lot of new money for community mental health programs and school security, and expand the background checks on gun buyers younger than 21.

“We couldn’t have gotten an agreement on any single one of those items a month ago,” Murphy said.

Even Mitch Mcconnell, R-KY., seems to be coming around. The Senate Republican leader has always been pretty proud of his record on weapons legislatio­n, which it’s fair to summarize as anti-gun safety. But now he’s given his blessing to some sort of reform. Perhaps he’s seen the error of his ways. Perhaps he’s seen the public polls.

If something is going to get done before the Senate goes off on its holiday recess, things have to happen pretty fast in a chamber not known for its speediness. “It took them five weeks to write an infrastruc­ture bill. We have four days,” Murphy said.

It’d be nice to see a lawmaker throw himself into a righteous cause and come out a winner, wouldn’t it, people? There’s even been a little talk about Murphy as a possible presidenti­al contender, should Joe Biden decide not to run for reelection. “No, no, no, no, no, no,” the senator responded when asked about the idea.

What do you think? All I know is that once we get past this year’s elections, everybody is going to start speculatin­g about 2024, and we really need to collect some post-biden options. You do not want to be at a holiday party next winter with no names to throw into the debate.

But about the gun bill.

The first — and let’s face it, easiest — priority is to complain that Washington isn’t rising to the occasion. “It’s not enough,” said Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, after he rather grudgingly acknowledg­ed the new Senate agreement represente­d some success.

You can understand why Illinois is touchy on this issue. At the NRA convention in Houston last month, speakers tried to skip over the mass shooting of Texas schoolchil­dren days earlier by talking about how many people get gunned down every year in Chicago. Mainly with weapons imported from other states, of course, although that part didn’t really come up.

The horror of those murdered children persuaded a lot of politician­s to dodge that NRA gathering entirely. Although not Donald Trump, a politician who actually had no idea he had any strong feelings about guns until he noticed how much cheering they got at Republican gatherings. In Houston, Trump suggested responding to the Uvalde school shooting tragedy by arming teachers.

Right now our priority has to be rooting for the gun bill negotiator­s in Congress to get the job done before everybody goes home. “We’ve got to work through some pretty sticky wickets,” Murphy said.

The wickets are, in fact, multitudin­ous, but at least things are moving along. “Victories beget victories,” insisted Murphy.

There’s a lot of territory to cover before we get to anyplace sane on the gun front. To anyplace near where surveys tell us the American people would like to go. But it’d be nice if, on July 4, we could celebrate with more fireworks and less gunfire.

 ?? KENT NISHIMURA/LOS ANGELES TIMES ?? Chris Murphy, D-conn., talks to the media about talks on gun safety legislatio­n last week in Washington.
KENT NISHIMURA/LOS ANGELES TIMES Chris Murphy, D-conn., talks to the media about talks on gun safety legislatio­n last week in Washington.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States