Herald-Tribune

Strong storm washes away $600K in shore protection

- Michael Casey

BOSTON – A Massachuse­tts beach community is scrambling after a weekend storm washed away $600,000 in sand that was trucked in to protect homes, roads and other infrastruc­ture.

The project, which brought 14,000 tons of sand into Salisbury over several weeks, was completed just three days before Sunday’s storm clobbered southern New England with strong winds, heavy rainfall and coastal flooding.

The Salisbury Beach Citizens for Change group, which facilitate­d the project and helped raise funds, posted on social media about the project’s completion last week and then again after the storm. They argued that the project still was worthwhile, noting that “the sacrificia­l dunes did their job” and protected some properties from being “eaten up” by the storm.

Tom Saab, president of the group and a real estate broker/developer, said the money was contribute­d by 150 property owners who said the state has refused to help them protect the beachfront and build up the dunes.

“The state will not contribute any money to the rebuilding of dunes. That is the bottom line,” Saab said. “Everybody is angry and upset. We can’t survive without sand rebuilding the dunes and can’t survive paying out of our pocket after every storm.”

Last weekend’s tempest was the latest of several recent severe storms in the community and across Massachuse­tts, which also suffered flooding, erosion and infrastruc­ture damage in January.

Sand replenishm­ent has been the government’s go-to method of shore protection for decades. Congress has long appropriat­ed money for such work, arguing it effectivel­y protects lives and property and sustains the tourism industry.

But critics say it’s inherently wasteful to keep pumping sand ashore that will inevitably wash away.

Climate change is forecast to bring more bad weather, including hurricanes, to the Northeast as waters warm, some scientists say. Worldwide, sea levels have risen faster since 1900, putting hundreds of millions of people at risk, the United Nations has said. And erosion from the changing conditions jeopardize­s beaches the world over, according to European Union researcher­s.

Salisbury is also not the first town to see its efforts literally wash away.

Earlier this year, after a storm destroyed its dunes, one New Jersey town sought emergency permission to build a steel barrier – something it had done in two other spots – along the most heavily eroded section of its beachfront after spending millions of dollars trucking sand to the site for over a decade. The state denied the request and instead fined North Wildwood for unauthoriz­ed beach repairs. The Department of Environmen­tal Protection has often opposed bulkheads, noting that the structures often encourage sand scouring that can accelerate and worsen erosion.

Republican state Sen. Bruce Tarr, who is working to secure $1.5 million in state funding to shore up the Salisbury dunes, says the efforts will protect a major roadway, water and sewer infrastruc­ture as well as hundreds of homes, which make up more than 40% of Salisbury’s tax base.

 ?? PETER PEREIRA/THE STANDARD-TIMES VIA AP ?? A road is damaged after heavy winds and surf battered the coastline Jan. 10 in Westport, Mass. Massachuse­tts has been hit by severe storms.
PETER PEREIRA/THE STANDARD-TIMES VIA AP A road is damaged after heavy winds and surf battered the coastline Jan. 10 in Westport, Mass. Massachuse­tts has been hit by severe storms.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States