Houston Chronicle Sunday

Weak regulation­s could limit nation’s energy market reforms

- By Dwight Dyer Dyer is a Mexico-based analyst at Control Risks, an internatio­nal political, integrity and security risk consultanc­y.

For the last seven decades, Mexico’s oil and gas sector has been a state-run monopoly, largely closed off to internatio­nal investment. Thanks to new reforms championed by President Ernesto Peña Nieto, that’s about to change, and energy companies in Houston and around the world are salivating at the prospect. They may need to hold their horses. Though the reforms have the potential to be good for business, and for Mexico itself, the true fate of the energy reforms hangs in the balance of the Mexican congressio­nal term that started earlier this month. The outcome is far from certain.

If Peña Nieto has his way, the energy sector will see increased competitio­n and a huge influx of both foreign and domestic investment starting in three to four years. Energy costs will drop, boosting the country’s economy, creating jobs and, of course, profits for those investors.

It’s not likely to turn out so rosy. Although the constituti­onal reforms were approved in principle last December, the details of how to implement those reforms must be ironed out. Mexico’s Congress still needs to determine what regulation­s and oversight bodies will govern the newly opened energy sector. It is the sort of task that requires careful, deliberate lawmaking.

That’s unlikely to happen. Congress set a deadline of April 20 to complete secondary reform legislatio­n. Missing that target could trigger an extraordin­ary session of Congress in which rational rule-making will be even less likely. It would almost certainly delay implementa­tion of the energy reforms, which works against the government’s electoral prospects.

On top of the time crunch, opponents of reform are determined to stall this process. Leftist opposition parties see the legislativ­e process as a chance to position themselves for greater success in local elections this coming summer and midterm elections in 2015. Gridlock seems almost inevitable.

Regardless of how quickly the legislativ­e process moves, any proposed regulation­s will likely be watered down by lobbying. The long-term costs of not strengthen­ing the rule of law could be significan­t. While some of Mexico’s industrial conglomera­tes recognize this, others see themselves better served by weak regulation and have “invested” in congressio­nal representa­tion to protect their interests. This could dampen the expectatio­ns of any potential new entrants into the Mexican energy sector. Congress could send a better signal by expediting the setup of the specialize­d economic competitio­n courts that have been proposed. This would go a long way toward improving the economy’s competitiv­eness, particular­ly if the new regulation­s leave too much leeway for interpreta­tion.

Despite the reforms, Mexico’s state-run energy company, Pemex, will still be a major player. Just what role it plays will be hotly debated in the legislativ­e session. Lawmakers are fretful after watching Brazil’s Petrobras slide from role-model to cautionary tale following a few failed investment­s and an initially disappoint­ing auction of offshore leases.

In order to compete with internatio­nal industry standards, Pemex would need to slash its labor force and compete with private investors for its most talented engineers and workers. A sharp uptick in job losses at Pemex could counterbal­ance any political benefits of increased internatio­nal investment, and parties that are seen as failing to protect the company’s jobs will likely suffer at the ballot box.

Given the time crunch and the political climate, the results of the current legisla- tive session may not be pretty. In the best scenario, Mexico’s Congress would pass regulatory legislatio­n that includes strong anti-corruption measures, clearly defined national contents rules and independen­t regulatory agencies. A far likelier scenario is a legislatio­n that lacks teeth to pursue criminal sanctions for corruption, attempts to leverage inefficien­t national providers of parts and services and creates politicall­ymotivated regulators.

Companies looking to cash in on a Mexican oil boom would do well to look before they leap.

 ?? Omar Torres / AFP / Getty Images ?? The drilling tower of an exploratio­n oil rig features the logo for PEMEX, Mexico’s state-owned oil company. In December, Mexico’s Senate approved reform that breaks the country’s oil monopoly by allowing foreign firms to drill for crude.
Omar Torres / AFP / Getty Images The drilling tower of an exploratio­n oil rig features the logo for PEMEX, Mexico’s state-owned oil company. In December, Mexico’s Senate approved reform that breaks the country’s oil monopoly by allowing foreign firms to drill for crude.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States