Luck helps museum gain lost masterpiece
On an afternoon last June, Mac Shafer carried some deeply personal cargo in the back seat of his Ford F-150 as he drove home to Mineral Wells.
That morning, 58-yearold Shafer, an avid art collector, had retrieved four favorite paintings he had loaned to Dallas’ Museum of Biblical Art. He had one more stop to make.
He swept past the rounded arches of the Kimbell Art Museum’s stately entrance, headed for an appointment with two of the Fort Worth museum’s most senior officials. Not in their offices. But in the museum’s underground garage.
Kimbell director Eric M. Lee and deputy director George T. M. Shackelford walked toward Shafer’s parked truck. They were intrigued by him for several reasons: He had approached them through the powerful recommendation of his friend Alice Walton, one of the Kimbell’s most loyal supporters and one of the world’s wealthiest women. And Shafer was convinced he had some interesting art to exhibit at the museum.
Using a trash can as a display area, Shafer presented the canvases, which had a consistent religious theme. And one by one, Lee and Shackelford showed polite, if muted, enthusiasm for their quality.
Except for painting No. 3.
An oil sketch of a European church, the work portrayed a somewhat gloomy Romanesque interior, a Gothic arch and a tabernacle rising over the altar. It bore the date 1841 and the signature “D. Roberts” — David Roberts, a somewhat renowned 19thcentury Scottish painter. Shafer had purchased the work, sold as Roberts’ Interior of Cathedral, in 2004.
Upon seeing this painting, Shackelford and Lee lost interest in the other pieces. Shackelford immediately snapped four iPhone shots of it.
“Both Eric and I noticed the quality of the brushwork was so high, so assured,” recalls Shackelford. “Of all the paintings Eric and I saw that day in the garage, it was the only one that had spark.”
They had an inkling that there might be more to this painting than met the eye.
And thus, in that 35-minute parking-garage meeting began one of the most improbable acquisitions of an important work in the Kimbell’s 44-year history — one that involved mistaken identity, careful forensic work and a bit of serendipity.
A happy accident
From the beginning, Lee and Shackelford were suspicious that this painting signed “David Roberts” was not at all a David Roberts painting. It was not a typical work by Roberts, who was best known for his Middle Eastern subjects.
In fact, Lee thought it looked more like the work of an infinitely more important artist, Richard Parkes Bonington.
Bonington (1802-1828) was a revered 19th-century British Romantic painter, a gifted landscape artist comparable in stature to J.M.W. Turner and John Constable.
One of the Kimbell’s first acquisitions under Lee’s direction, in 2009, was a Bonington oil sketch called The Grand Canal, Venice, Looking Toward the Rialto, which is part of the museum’s permanent collection.
Lee has always held a special fondness for Bonington’s work.
“He just speaks to me,” he says. “There is this freshness about his paintings.” Then, a clue.
Aweek after seeing Shafer’s painting, Shackelford went online to identify a watercolor of a Venetian palace. He thought of Bonington, who had done some of his finest watercolors in Venice.
“I remember typing ‘Bonington and watercolors,’” he says. “In the cen- ter of one of the image rows was a watercolor with exactly the same composition as Shafer’s ‘David Roberts.’”
Shackelford traced the link on that watercolor to London’s Wallace Collection, which attributed it to Bonington as Interior of Sant’ Ambrogio, Milan — a church scene that matched all the elements within Shafer’s “David Roberts” church painting.
Although the “Roberts” in Fort Worth was an oil painting and the Wallace Collection’s Bonington was a watercolor, the match made sense — Bonington was known to work up oil sketches to use as the basis for a later studio watercolor or oil.
“Then by extension, the painting had to be connected to the watercolor,” Shackelford says. “Figuring out how was the next step.”
He sent the Wallace Collection photograph to Lee.
“I immediately noticed that the overall composition of the Bonington watercolor was so similar to the ‘David Roberts’ oil sketch church interior,” Lee says.
Indeed, the similarities continued to tantalize Shackelford and Lee.
“Looking back, it was such a one-in-a-million, pure accident that I would see this Bonington watercolor at the Wallace Collection and make the connection to Shafer’s painting,” Shackelford says.
But forensic work would be needed to confirm their suspicions.
Forged signature
Lee asked Shafer to bring the painting back to the Kimbell.
“I can still hear him saying very excitedly that he thought the Roberts I had was a lost painting and that he was very anxious for me to bring it back in so the museum could do more research on it,” Shafer says.
When it arrived, the museum’s director of conservation, Claire Barry, began to examine it. During a cursory cleaning, she lifted off the “D. Roberts 1841” inscription. That the signature could so easily be removed from its outer varnish layer indicated that it likely had been forged by an unscrupulous art dealer
“In looking into the provenance of the ‘David Roberts’ work,” recalls Barry, “we discovered that the collector of this thenunsigned piece thought it must be a David Roberts because he was known to occasionally paint church interiors. And by faking the Roberts signature in 1841, they thought they could get more money at auction.”
Using X-radiography and infrared images, she compared the bold blocking of all the architectural elements used by Bonington in the Kimbell’s Grand Canal, Venice canvas with the same strong blocking for “Roberts” interior.
Both works showed the same use of a squared-off brush, lead white paint and delicate brush detail, she said.
“Those strokes are like the fingerprints of an artist,” she said. “It was clear they were both done by the same hand.”
Barry’s forensic work also revealed that both works shared a specific brand of millboard used to support the canvases. Millboard was a convenient support used by 19th-century painters when painting outdoor oil sketches.
Her finding was confirmed by Patrick Noon, the Elizabeth MacMillan Chair of Paintings at the Minneapolis Institute of Art and the world’s foremost Bonington expert.
In a recent interview, Noon offered another bit of intriguing information.
“Bonington never signed his oil sketches,” Noon says. “So it is likely that the owner or dealer of this unsigned work decided to put David Roberts’ name and date in a specific attempt to deceive. … It couldn’t be Roberts. It didn’t even look like his signature.”
While Barry conducted forensic examinations, Lee did some detective work. He found in Noon’s catalog of Bonington’s work a reproduction of the watercolor of the Sant’ Ambrogio, Milan church interior, based on an untraced oil sketch.
Lee also read Noon’s account of Bonington’s time in Milan where personal letters mention making oil sketches of the nocturnal lighting effect on the interior of a church.
“I began hyperventilating,” Lee says. “I called up Patrick Noon to tell him that we might have discovered a rare Bonington painting.”
Noon vividly remembers that call from Lee.
“A painting by an artist like that doesn’t necessarily walk in off the streets of Texas,” Noon says.
In fact, it had taken a long and winding road to Shafer’s home in Mineral Wells.
Changing hands
According to a Christie’s number on the painting, it was first sold as a Roberts work titled Serving Mass at Christie’s in London in 1946. Another label shows it went to auction again in 1995, in Stockholm. The work was later acquired by a collector who consigned it to auction in New Orleans in 2003 as Roberts’ Interior of Cathedral, but it went unsold.
That year, Shafer — who began collecting art seriously after retiring from the oil and gas business — paged through a catalog from the Neal Auction Co. of New Orleans when his eye caught an interior church scene painted by David Roberts. He immediately contacted the auction house and learned the work had been shipped back to its original owner, Leonard Walley, in nearby Garland.
In April 2004, the men met to look at the Roberts painting in a mutually convenient location: the parking lot of Fort Worth’s Railhead Smokehouse.
“I took one look at that David Roberts painting, and I didn’t dicker one moment over the price,” Shafer recalls. “I wrote him a check for $3,800 — literally what he asked for it — because I knew I wanted that painting.”
Shafer took it home and hung it in his Mineral Wells office for years, until 2009, when he loaned it and three other religiousthemed works to Dallas’ Museum of Biblical Art — where they were on display for six years, until the day last summer when he drove it to the Kimbell.
The final sale
As evidence mounted that Shafer’s “Roberts” was a long-lost and much coveted Bonington, Noon flew to Fort Worth to examine the work.
“Clearly, this painting showed Bonington’s style of execution,” Noon says. “He was just so wonderfully facile in how quickly he put the paint down, with such assurance.”
The team determined that Shafer’s “David Roberts” work was, indeed, Richard Bonington’s The Interior of Sant’ Ambrogio, Milan, 1826.
Once Noon gave the Bonington his final imprimatur, the Kimbell purchased it from Shafer in December. According to art market sources, the Kimbell paid under $1 million, or approximately $2.8 million less than what was reportedly paid at a Christie’s auction last July for a major Bonington coastal landscape.
Shafer, a collector with an uncommonly sharp eye for a masterpiece, was moved to see his Bonington hanging in the hallowed walls of perhaps his favorite museum.
“It really was a dream come true,” Shafer says, “because I so love art and to see my painting that I had in my collection since 2004 hanging at the Kimbell, all cleaned, well, that’s simply amazing.”