Houston Chronicle Sunday

State should work to expand voter turnout, not suppress it

Denying people the ability to cast ballots is un-American

- By James C. Harrington

There was a time in the recent past when America did much to make it easier for people to vote. Congress passed the 1965 Voting Rights Act to undo the vestiges and practices of voter suppressio­n based on race and ethnicity. State and local government­s instituted early voting, facilitate­d absentee ballots, lengthened polling hours and made electoral registrati­on as easy as mailing a postcard.

Voting is the most important action we do as Americans. Yet, in the last few years, Texas leading the way, politician­s have made voting more difficult, reversing decades of progress. We have seen a pattern of votersuppr­ession laws and actions across the land. These methods are aimed at certain groups of people, whose interests differ significan­tly from those in power.

Denying the franchise is un-American. Because we live by what the majority speaks, we must do all we can to have as many speak as possible. That’s how democracy works at its best.

Since 2011, nineteen states have enacted laws to make voting more difficult. Although the majority of states require some kind of voter ID, only 13 states have very strict laws (nine of them requiting a limited specific photo ID). Altogether, these ID laws affect 10 percent of the electorate. Six states have reduced early voting, and six

states have tightened voter registrati­on laws, including Texas, making it more difficult for groups, such as the League of Women Voters, to conduct registrati­on drives.

The argument is that this is to control fraud, although in reality incidents of fraud are extraordin­arily few, and absolutely none on any large scale, given the billions of ballots cast over the years. The fraud argument is a charade.

Texas even had a $20 fee for a voter ID, if someone didn’t already have one of the limited ID options prescribed by lawmakers. It operated like the old poll tax, designed to keep Texas’ minority and poor people from voting.

Fortunatel­y, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently blocked Texas’ voter ID law, finding that it adversely impacted minority voters. Indeed, experts calculated that the ID law effectivel­y disenfranc­hised more than 600,000 actual voters.

There are other dangers to elections as well, two posed by the U.S. Supreme Court itself. First was the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision that removed restrictio­ns of campaign donations and unleashed a torrent of money, letting millionair­es, billionair­es, and corporatio­ns shamelessl­y far outspend the average citizen and tell their employees how they should vote. This grossly disproport­ionate power undermines a democracy.

The level of money expended on campaigns these days is obscene: $1 billion has already gone into this year’s presidenti­al campaign. Imagine how far $1 billion would have gone on educating kids, setting up job skills training, improving medical care in the poor and rural areas of our nation, and so on.

The second Supreme Court decision was Shelby County, Texas v. Holder, which gutted applicatio­n of the Voting Rights Act, even though the law operated just fine and Congress had renewed it repeatedly by large majorities.

If we want a democracy that works and flourishes, we have to reverse course and facilitate voting for everyone. Early balloting, weekend voting, and same-day registrati­on are all worthy options. We need a constituti­onal amendment to overturn Citizens United, and perhaps one to limit campaigns to 60 days, as do other countries.

Since 2011, Texas politician­s have spent $3.5 million in federal litigation to make it more difficult for Texans to vote. Ironically, Texas has lower electoral participat­ion than most of the states, ranking 46th — and sometimes worse. If Texas politician­s were really sincere about strengthen­ing democracy and voter participat­ion, that $3.5 million could have gone to promoting voting rather than on closing the doors to polling places.

Dramatical­ly increasing the number of people who show up on Election Day would make Texas proud instead of being known as the state whose governors and Legislatur­e do their best to suppress voting. It’s time to let our voices be heard.

 ?? Associated Press ?? Texas has agreed to spend $2.5 million on voter outreach before November. Despite that directive — and despite the facts about voter fraud — Texans could see a renewed effort to pass a new legislativ­e package designed to discourage voter participat­ion.
Associated Press Texas has agreed to spend $2.5 million on voter outreach before November. Despite that directive — and despite the facts about voter fraud — Texans could see a renewed effort to pass a new legislativ­e package designed to discourage voter participat­ion.
 ?? Ilana Panich-Linsman / New York Times ?? If we want a democracy that works and flourishes, we have to reverse course and facilitate voting for everyone.
Ilana Panich-Linsman / New York Times If we want a democracy that works and flourishes, we have to reverse course and facilitate voting for everyone.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States