Houston Chronicle Sunday

Founding Fathers believed in separation of church and state

- By John Fea

There’s an old Baptist saying that goes something like this: “If you mix horse manure and ice cream it doesn’t do much to the manure, but it sure does ruin the ice cream.”

I thought about this saying when I heard that Donald Trump was speaking in Orlando, Fla., to 700 evangelica­l pastors with the American Renewal Project.

The American Renewal Project is founded and directed by David Lane, a conservati­ve Christian political activist who is trying to get 1,000 pastors to run for political office between 2016-18.

Lane believes that the United States was founded as a Christian nation, but in recent decades it has lost its way. This is why pastors need to hold political office. They should be on the front lines of Lane’s grand project to restore Christian America.

Lane’s vision for renewal is rooted in a deeply flawed version of U.S. history. Despite the fact that nearly every historian in the country, including evangelica­l historians like myself, rejects the idea that the United States was founded as a Christian nation, Lane continues to peddle this view. He manipulate­s the past for the purpose of his political agenda.

When Trump says “Make America Great Again,” it is hard to imagine Lane interpreti­ng that phrase in any way other than as a call to reclaim a golden age that never existed.

Trump’s speech to Lane’s pastors assembled in Orlando did not focus specifical­ly on clergy running for office. Instead he went after the so-called “Johnson Amendment,” a 1954 addition to the tax code stating, “organizati­ons are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participat­ing in, or intervenin­g in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office.” Evangelica­ls like Lane see the Johnson Amendment as a hindrance to free speech and religious freedom. Trump joked that the repeal of the amendment may be his ticket to heaven, but his opposition to the amendment is probably motivated by more earthly goals. He wants evangelica­l pastors to endorse his candidacy without fear of punishment from the IRS.

There has been a lot of debate over how the Johnson Amendment has, or will, affect the speech rights of evangelica­l pastors who want to use their pulpits to endorse candidates. The amendment has rarely been enforced. Pastors have been using their authority to support political candidates for a long time. Moreover, the Johnson Amendment does not apply to individual pastors. It only applies to churches.

Since Lane likes to appeal to history in his efforts to get pastors more involved in the political process, it is worth noting that the American Founding Fathers had a few things to say about the topic. The founders who crafted the original state government­s — those government­s celebrated by today’s conservati­ve politician­s as the most important source of democratic life — thought it was a good idea for ministers to stay out of politics.

The state constituti­ons of North Carolina (1776), New York (1777), Georgia (1777), South Carolina (1778), Delaware (1792),Tennessee (1796), Maryland (1799), and Kentucky (1799) all banned clergymen from running for office.

The 1776 North Carolina Constituti­on states “that no clergyman, or preacher of the gospel of any denominati­on, shall be capable of being a member of either the Senate, House of Commons, or Council of State, while he continues in the exercise of the pastoral function.”

The 1777 New York Constituti­on uses similar language: “And whereas the ministers of the gospels are, by their profession, dedicated to the service of God and the care of souls, and ought not to be diverted from the great duties of their function; therefore, no minister of the gospel, or priest of any denominati­on whatsoever, shall, at any time hereafter, under any pretense of descriptio­n whatever, be eligible to, or capable of holding, any civil or military office or place within this State.”

The Founding Fathers understood something about the role of clergy in American society that Lane and his Christian nationalis­t friends do not. Those who care for the soul have a “great” spiritual duty that should never be compromise­d or tarnished by politics. This is why they thought that the “separation of church and state” was important.

For all those concerned about the witness of the Christian church in the world, let’s remember that the founders thought it was a bad idea to mix horse manure and ice cream.

 ?? New York Times ?? David Lane’s hope is that pastors will help mobilize congregati­ons behind conservati­ve candidates.
New York Times David Lane’s hope is that pastors will help mobilize congregati­ons behind conservati­ve candidates.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States