Houston Chronicle Sunday

A new low: bank-account numbers in wedding invitation­s

- JUDITH MARTIN Visit Miss Manners at missmanner­s.com, where you can send her your questions. Andrews McMeel Syndicatio­n

Dear Miss Manners:

A friend and colleague is getting married, and I accepted her orally delivered invitation long before she gave me the printed one.

Opening the two-folded card, I found, framed in it, a smaller card with a bank-account number printed in bold, and the suggestion that one might, if so inclined, contribute to the couple’s honeymoon. It was only by removing this first card from the frame that I got to the actual invitation (which declared its own relief at being found, opening with a “Finally!” — which was supposed to be a selfdeprec­ating joke).

The groom, however, probably knowing how I feel about begging for — well, anything really — started justifying their decision to include their bankaccoun­t details and made a point of explaining how impractica­l more traditiona­l gifts would be for them.

Once I got home and was done with my head-shaking, I realized that the couple hadn’t even provided all the necessary details for the donation they are soliciting: a second, necessary, bank code was missing, as well as the name of their bank and the details of the account holder(s). I know both of their full names, but they aren’t provided, either.

I now see three possibilit­ies of action for myself, all of which make me rather uncomforta­ble: 1. Ask them to provide the missing informatio­n so that I can comply with their request. 2. Reply in kind, accepting the invitation and enclosing an amount of money while profusely apologizin­g for such a vulgar gesture and explaining I didn’t have all the data for a banking transactio­n and didn’t wish to bother them at a highly busy time. 3. Straight-out ignore the displeasur­e expressed by the groom at the prospect of actual gifts, and buy them one I suspect will not be appreciate­d. What do you recommend?

Gentle Reader:

Would not this couple be afraid that someone might misuse their informatio­n? Perhaps that is why it was incomplete.

While it is commendabl­e that you want to please this couple and facilitate their rude and greedy request, Miss Manners feels compelled to remind you that it is they who are committing the transgress­ion, not you. Send them a present that you hope might please them — perhaps with an accompanyi­ng note that their banking informatio­n was confusing. This might result in them correcting it for you, but you may ignore that.

Dear Miss Manners:

I threw a birthday party for myself. It was a big birthday for me, and I paid for everyone’s dinner (including wine). This was an expensive affair, and I went all out. Two couples (the wealthier ones, LOL) came without a gift (only a card). Was it presumptuo­us of me to find this rude?

Gentle Reader:

Yes. While Miss Manners commends you for not forcing others to pay for your own lavish party, it is only recently — and under false notions of etiquette — that this has become unusual. It is, in fact, correct. Expecting a present for it in return, however, is not.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States