Houston Chronicle Sunday

HISD pushes cuts to funding

District officials propose $200M budget decrease

- By Shelby Webb

Houston Independen­t School District officials said Saturday the district will need to cut about $200 million from its 2018-19 budget to bring spending in line with an increasing­ly gloomy financial outlook.

In an equally momentous move, district officials also proposed far-reaching changes to how magnet and school choice systems operate, some of the boldest moves to date by secondyear Superinten­dent Richard Carranza.

Still reeling from Hurricane Harvey, HISD officials revealed at a board meeting Saturday that the district is facing a double whammy: a multimilli­on-dollar, statemanda­ted “recapture” payment requiring districts with high property values to “share the wealth,” and an expected drop in enrollment and tax revenue because of the storm, which severely damaged schools and delayed the start of classes by two weeks.

The proposed cuts come at an inopportun­e time, with the district battling to stave off a potential state takeover because of 10 chronicall­y underperfo­rming schools.

Although the measures outlined Saturday are preliminar­y and could change significan­tly before HISD’s board votes on them, officials acknowledg­ed that the district is entering an uncertain time.

“It’s a sea change for HISD,” said Rene Barajas, the district’s chief financial officer. “But at the end of the day, from a budgetary perspectiv­e, we’re still going to get the job done. It’s just going to be harder.”

District officials said

“This is a different kind of cut. We’ve had cuts … because of a shortfall, but we always had a way we could get out.” Brian Busby, HISD COO

about 44 percent of necessary spending cuts could come from classrooms, while about 56 percent could be from central administra­tion, maintenanc­e and operations.

Among the biggest proposals: centralizi­ng school funding and standardiz­ing staffing based on studentto-staff ratios. Leveling out staffing

Barajas proposed scaling back the practice of giving schools a pot of money each year through per-unit allocation­s, known as the PUA system. Currently, each school is given money by the district, and principals have almost complete discretion to spend it on staffing, programs and other needs and wants. Under the proposed system, each school would have set staffing levels based on student-to-staff ratios, which would be paid for by central administra­tion.

For example, at the middle-school level, each school would have one teacher per 30 students and one counselor per school or for every 500 students. Now, there is no codified staffing system, and some schools have as many as 15 assistant principals while others have one or two.

The staffing standardiz­ation would mean the district’s largest schools, such as Bellaire and Lamar high schools, could see a large number of cuts, while under-enrolled schools, such as Kashmere High, would likely see fewer cuts.

Barajas recommende­d centralizi­ng substitute teachers, athletics department­s, special education, career technical programs and campus stipends.

District officials also called for cutting about $116 million from spending on central administra­tion, operations and facilities.

Barajas said HISD’s budget situation is the result of a perfect storm — growing recapture payments, a projected loss of tax revenue due to lower property values after Hurricane Harvey, fewer students (also due to the hurricane) and a slew of other issues. And though HISD can lessen the amount it owes for “recapture” because of the storm, the district still stands to lose more than it will gain because of potentiall­y lower tax revenues, thanks to hundreds of thousands of flooded buildings. Barajas said it’s as if HISD lost $10 in local taxes but its recapture payment was only $2 less.

“That means I’m still short $8,” he said. ‘No fund balance’

HISD Chief Operating Officer Brian Busby said that in his 20 years with the district, he’s never seen cuts deep enough to affect every level of the district.

“This is a different kind of cut. We’ve had cuts where we had to cut food service staff because of a shortfall, but we always had a way we could get out,” he said. “We always had CFOs who could come in say, ‘We’ll help you this time but won’t help again,’ and they would go in fund balance or the superinten­dent’s account.

“But now there is no fund balance, there is no superinten­dent’s account to go to for this, because there’s never been a cut at this level.”

Andy Dewey, executive vice president for the Houston Federation of Teachers, said it seems to make sense to change the way schools are funded and to standardiz­e some positions. But he worried about what potential staffing cuts could mean for classrooms.

“I want to see how the new funding system will affect our biggest schools like Bellaire and Lamar,” Dewey said. “We can’t go back to 40- and 45-kid class sizes in high school. If that’s going to happen, it has to be looked at.”

He also said the district should be ready for a “major battle” when it comes to changing magnet programs, although he agreed with some potential changes.

The proposed changes to magnet and school choice systems arose from the recommenda­tions of a committee composed of magnet and neighborho­od school principals, parents, university experts and district staff, according to Mark Smith, HISD’s chief student support officer.

Under the current system, schools have significan­t freedom to create magnet programs and fund them as they see fit. There are about 115 different magnet programs and schools throughout the district, and at many of the most soughtafte­r magnet schools — including the High School for Performing and Visual Arts and DeBakey High School for Health Profession­s — there are far higher numbers of white and affluent students than are enrolled across the district. Two types of magnets

The proposed new system would create two types of magnet schools: unique magnet campuses that enroll students from across the district and feeder magnets that would establish magnet programs in elementary, middle and high schools that feed into one another.

It calls for creating four school choice/magnet quadrants. Each geographic quadrant would offer schools with the same magnet themes, perhaps including but not limited to performing and visual arts, dual language, early college, career technical programs and special education programs. There would be an elementary, middle and high school of each magnet theme in each quadrant.

Vanguard programs and schools, including Carnegie Vanguard High School, would lose their magnet designatio­n and would become schools and programs of choice. That means they would lose their additional magnet funding, although the state already gives schools extra money for every gifted and talented student they educate. Carnegie Vanguard High would continue to offer open enrollment to students from across the district and would still likely offer transporta­tion to all its students.

Smith said the committee also recommende­d giving some preference to students from economical­ly disadvanta­ged families and neighborho­ods when considerin­g admission to open-enrollment magnet schools, and he suggested eliminatin­g many academic and test-score requiremen­ts for magnet or school choice lotteries.

Ultimately, the potential changes would likely cut the number of magnet programs and schools districtwi­de from about 115 to about 85 and would codify a system for reviewing, starting and ending magnet programs and schools.

Smith said student applicatio­ns for magnet programs may need to be reopened in March for students who applied to magnet programs that may cease to exist come August.

Carranza shelved plans to drasticall­y cut magnet funding in 2016 after facing pushback from parents.

He stressed that the committee’s recommenda­tions are far from final and that the district will reach out to parents and school communitie­s to get feedback.

“We never went in with a lens to destroy magnets — that’s not our goal,” Carranza said. “Our goal is to take a serious look at our portfolio of schools, identify areas that need improvemen­t and start a conversati­on with the board to see what needs to change to ensure equitable access.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States