Houston Chronicle Sunday

N.C. prosecutio­ns target felons unaware of voting restrictio­ns

- By Jack Healy

GRAHAM, N.C. — Keith Sellars and his daughters were driving home from dinner last December when he was pulled over for running a red light. The officer ran a background check and came back with bad news for Sellars. There was a warrant out for his arrest.

As his girls cried in the back seat, Sellars was handcuffed and taken to jail. His crime: Illegal voting. “I didn’t know,” said Sellars, who spent the night in jail before his family paid his $2,500 bond. “I thought I was practicing my right.”

Sellars, 44, is one of a dozen people in Alamance County in North Carolina who have been charged with voting illegally in the 2016 presidenti­al election. All were on probation or parole for felony conviction­s, which in North Carolina and many other states disqualifi­es a person from voting. If convicted, they face up to two years in prison.

12 charged; 9 black

While election experts and public officials across the country say there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud, local prosecutor­s and state officials in North Carolina, Texas, Kansas, Idaho and other states have sought to send a tough message by filing criminal charges against the tiny fraction of people caught voting illegally.

“That’s the law,” said Pat Nadolski, the Republican district attorney in Alamance County. “You can’t do it. If we have clear cases, we’re going to prosecute.”

The cases are rare compared with the tens of millions of votes cast in state and national elections. In 2017, at least 11 people nationwide were convicted of illegal voting because they were felons or noncitizen­s, according to a database of voting prosecutio­ns compiled by the conservati­ve Heritage Foundation. Others have been convicted of voting twice, filing false registrati­ons or casting a ballot for a family member.

The case against the 12 voters in Alamance County is unusual for the number of people charged at once. And because nine of the defendants are black, the case has touched a nerve in a state with a history of suppressin­g African-American votes.

Local civil-rights groups and black leaders have urged the district attorney to drop the prosecutio­n, saying that black voters were being disproport­ionately punished for an unwitting mistake. AfricanAme­ricans in North Carolina are more likely to be disqualifi­ed from voting because of felony conviction­s; their rate of incarcerat­ion is more than four times that of white residents, according to the Prison Policy Initiative, a nonprofit organizati­on. “It smacks of Jim Crow,” said Barrett Brown, head of the Alamance County NAACP. Referring to the district attorney, he added, “I don’t think he targeted black people. But if you cast that net, you’re going to catch more African-Americans.”

Activists protest

Activists have protested outside the county courthouse. They are now worried that the fear of prosecutio­n may suppress black turnout in the midterm elections. North Carolina lawmakers have put a constituti­onal amendment on November ballots that would change the state constituti­on to require voter identifica­tion.

After the state audit that found 441 felons had voted, North Carolina’s Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcemen­t changed the layout of the voter forms, adding check boxes to make them easier to understand. The board said it was also working with courts and probation officials to make sure people are aware that they lose their voting rights while serving a felony sentence and probation.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States