Houston Chronicle Sunday

How Trump has strong-armed the GOP

- By Jonathan Martin and Maggie Haberman

BIRMINGHAM, Mich. — By the summer of 2017, Dave Trott, a two-term Republican congressma­n, was worried enough about President Donald Trump’s erratic behavior and his flailing attempts to repeal the Affordable Care Act that he criticized the president in a closed-door meeting with fellow GOP lawmakers.

The response was instantane­ous — but had nothing to do with the substance of Trott’s concerns. “Dave, you need to know somebody has already told the White House what you said,” he recalled a colleague telling him. “Be ready for a barrage of tweets.”

Trott got the message: To defy Trump is to invite the president’s wrath, ostracism within the party and a premature end to a career in Republican politics. Trott decided not to seek re-election in his suburban Detroit district, concluding that running as an anti-Trump Republican was untenable, and joining a wave of Republican departures from Congress that has left those who remain more devoted to the president than ever.

“If I was still there and speaking out against the president, what would happen to me?” Trott said before answering his own question: Trump would have lashed out and pressured House GOP leaders to punish him.

Just under four years after he began his takeover of a party to which he had little connection, Trump enters 2020 burdened with the ignominy of being the first sitting president to seek reelection after being impeached.

But he does so wearing a political coat of armor built on total loyalty from GOP activists and their representa­tives in Congress. If he does not enjoy the broad admiration Republican­s afforded Ronald Reagan, he is more feared by his party’s lawmakers than any occupant of the Oval Office since at least Lyndon Johnson.

His iron grip was never firmer than over the last two months, during the House inquiry that concluded Wednesday with Trump’s impeachmen­t on charges of abuse of power and obstructin­g Congress. No House Republican supported either article, or even authorized the investigat­ion in September, and in hearing after hearing into the president’s dealings with Ukraine, they defended him as a victim of partisan fervor. One Republican even said that Jesus had received fairer treatment before his crucifixio­n than Trump did during his impeachmen­t.

Perhaps more revealing, some GOP lawmakers who initially said Trump’s phone call with the president of Ukraine was inappropri­ate later dropped their criticism. People close to Trump attributed the shift both to his public defense of the call as “perfect” and to private discussion­s he and his allies had with concerned lawmakers.

This fealty hardly guarantees Trump re-election: He has never garnered a 50 percent approval rating as president and over half of voters tell pollsters they will oppose him no matter who the Democrats nominate.

But the shoulder-to-shoulder unity stands in contrast to Democrats at the moment, with their contentiou­s moderate-versuslibe­ral primary that was on full display in Thursday night’s debate. And it is all the more striking given Trump’s deviations from long-standing party orthodoxy on issues like foreign policy and tariffs.

“He has a complete connection with the average Republican voter and that’s given him political power here,” said Rep. Patrick McHenry, R-N.C., adding: “Trump has touched the nerve of my conservati­ve base like no person in my lifetime.”

Interviews with current and former Republican lawmakers as well as party strategist­s, many of whom requested anonymity so as not to publicly cross the president, suggest that many elected officials are effectivel­y faced with two choices. They can vote with their feet by retiring — and a remarkable 40 percent of Republican members of Congress have done so or have been defeated at the ballot box since Trump took office.

Or they can mute their criticism of him. All the incentives that shape political behavior — with voters, donors and the news media — compel Republican­s to bow to Trump if they want to survive.

Sitting in a garland-bedecked hotel restaurant in his former district, Trott said that he did not want to seek re-election “as a Trumper” — and that he knew he had little future in the party as an opponent of the president.

There is no market, he said, for independen­ce. Divergence from Trumpism will never be good enough for Democrats; Trump will target you among Republican­s, Trott added, and the vanishing voters from the political middle will never have a chance to reward you because you would not make it through a primary. That will be ensured in part by the megaphone the president wields with the conservati­ve news media.

“Trump is emotionall­y, intellectu­ally and psychologi­cally unfit for office, and I’m sure a lot of Republican­s feel the same way,” Trott said. “But if they say that, the social media barrage will be overwhelmi­ng.” He added that he would be open to the presidenti­al candidacy of former Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York.

On the other hand, Trump dangles rewards to those who show loyalty — a favorable tweet, or a presidenti­al visit to their state — and his heavy hand has assured victory for a number of Republican candidates in their primaries. That includes Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida, who did as many Fox News appearance­s as possible to draw the president’s attention.

Rep. Elise Stefanik hails from an upstate New York district that the president carried by 14 points yet she had not previously hesitated to go her own way.

“I have one of the most independen­t records in the House,” Stefanik said. “And I have critiqued the president, have voted differentl­y than the president.”

Yet after she vehemently criticized the impeachmen­t hearings and found herself under attack by George Conway, the antiTrump husband of the White House adviser Kellyanne Conway, she welcomed the embrace of the president, his family and news media allies such as the Fox News host Sean Hannity — and the campaign donations that poured in.

Stefanik said she opposed impeachmen­t because Democrats failed to make a convincing case. But she said that she would not have even voted to censure the president, and that she was chiefly driven by wanting to “stand up for my district.”

And, Stefanik noted, since her “no” vote she had received “the most positive calls since I was sworn into office.”

Lawmakers not seeking reelection are often the most candid about the slavish devotion Trump engenders with voters — and the pressure it puts on them.

“Public officials need to be held accountabl­e, and I don’t think any government­al system works well with blind loyalty without reason,” said Rep. Francis Rooney of Florida, who announced his intention to retire earlier this year after criticizin­g Trump for his conduct with Ukraine and suffering an immediate backlash.

Rooney ultimately voted against impeachmen­t but told colleagues he felt uneasy about it. Recalling an appearance on a Florida television station afterward, Rooney said: “They interviewe­d me after the vote and then they interviewe­d one of these Cape Coral Republican ladies and she said, ‘Well, it’s about time they came around to realize it’s a big media hoax.’ How do you argue with that? How do you reason with that?”

 ?? Erin Schaff / New York Times ?? Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., like many of her colleagues, has been a vocal defender of President Donald Trump, who demands complete fealty, and, as the impeachmen­t hearings showed, has largely attained it.
Erin Schaff / New York Times Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., like many of her colleagues, has been a vocal defender of President Donald Trump, who demands complete fealty, and, as the impeachmen­t hearings showed, has largely attained it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States