Houston Chronicle Sunday

Fight over Fed powers stalls relief plan

- By Andrew Taylor and Christophe­r Rugaber

WASHINGTON — An arcane battle over emergency Federal Reserve powers foiled efforts on Saturday to lock down an agreement on an almost $1 trillion COVID-19 economic relief package. Saturday’s deadlock was just the latest stumble in a partisan, monthslong fight over pandemic relief, and the lack of progress is backing lawmakers once again up against a government shutdown deadline Sunday night.

Lawmakers on both sides said a provision by Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., that would curb emergency Federal Reserve powers was the sticking point. Republican­s are insisting on the Toomey plan, while Democrats are adamantly against it. A compromise was proving elusive, but communicat­ions channels are open, as key lawmakers convened in scrums on the Senate floor and as Toomey and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., met to exchange ideas.

“I think that we should be able to get a deal done,” Toomey said afterward.

“I think they agreed to go back and write down what they were saying, so everybody can read it and exchange paper,” said Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas.

The latest pratfall likely upends hopes for a House vote Sunday and quick Senate action on an agreement that’s virtually ready save for Toomey’s provision.

“That has to be resolved. And then everything will fall into place,” said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. “It’s a very significan­t difference.”

A new deadline of midnight

Sunday for a government shutdown served as a backstop for the tortuous negotiatio­ns, which were being conducted in secret largely among the top four leaders in Congress.

“We need to conclude our talks, draft legislatio­n and land this plane,” said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

Toomey defended his controvers­ial provision in a floor speech, saying the emergency powers were designed to stabilize capital markets at the height of the COVID-19 panic this spring and are expiring at the end of the month anyway. The language would block the Biden administra­tion from restarting them.

At issue are Fed emergency programs, launched amid the pandemic this spring, that provided loans to small and mid-size businesses and bought state and local government bonds. Those bond purchases havemade it easier for those government­s to borrow, at a time when their finances are under pressure fromjob losses and health costs stemming from the pandemic.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said last month that those programs, along with two that purchased corporate bonds, would close at the end of the year, prompting an initial objection by the Fed. Under the Dodd-Frank financial reform law passed after the Great Recession, the Fed can only set up emergency programs with the support of the treasury secretary.

But in Mnuchin’s letter closing the programs, he said the Fed could request that future treasury secretarie­s renewthem. Fed Chair Jerome Powell echoed that view Wednesday at a news conference. Yet Toomey’s language would bar the Fed from doing so.

The massive package would wrap much of Capitol Hill’s unfinished 2020 business into a takeit-or-leave-it measure that promises to be a foot thick or more. House lawmakers will probably have only a few hours to study it before voting as early as Sunday afternoon. A Senate vote would follow, probably on Monday. One more short-term funding bill probably would be needed to avoid the looming deadline.

The emerging $900 billion agreement would deliver more than $300 billion in aid to businesses and provide the jobless a $300-per-week bonus federal unemployme­nt benefit and renewal of state benefits thatwould otherwise expire right after Christmas. It includes $600 direct payments to individual­s; vaccine distributi­on funds and money for renters, schools, the Postal Service and people needing food aid.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States