Houston Chronicle Sunday

For Earth Day: Climate activist myths that need busting

- By Dana R. Fisher Dana R. Fisher is the director of the Center for Environmen­t, Community & Equity and professor in the School of Internatio­nal Service, American University. This piece first appeared in The Conversati­on.

Earth Day is Monday and climate activists around the world are planning rallies and other events to draw attention to the growing threats posed by climate change.

Many of these demonstrat­ions will focus on what humanity can do to stop fueling the damage. But while activists are amplifying the dire findings from scientists, you’ll likely see fossil fuel supporters attacking them on social media and TV.

It’s easy to get caught up in the myths about climate activism, particular­ly in today’s polarized political environmen­t. So, let’s take a moment to explore the truth about three of the big myths being told about climate activism and the climate movement today.

Myth 1: Climate activists are just young people

The media tends to focus most of its attention on young people in the climate movement, including those inspired by Greta Thunberg’s school strikes for climate, the internatio­nal Fridays for Future, or the Sunrise Movement, which focuses on U.S. climate action.

Neverthele­ss, a substantia­l proportion of the active climate movement today is made up of older adults, including those called “climate grannies” and the “rocking chair rebellion.”

Just as young people have outspoken climate leaders, many of these older activists were inspired to get involved by longtime activists such as Jane Fonda and Bill McKibben and the group McKibben started specifical­ly to mobilize older Americans: ThirdAct. As my research has found, these more mature activists cut their teeth in the civil rights and anti-war movements, along with earlier waves of the environmen­tal movement.

Over the past 25 years, I have surveyed numerous waves of activists participat­ing in demonstrat­ions and protests to understand who they are and what motivates them to participat­e in activism. My new book, “Saving Ourselves: From Climate Shocks to Climate Action,” brings these findings together to understand how the climate movement has evolved along with the climate crisis.

When I surveyed participan­ts at the March to End Fossil Fuels, which drew 75,000 people in New York City in September 2023, a quarter of the crowd was 53 years old or older. At a much smaller demonstrat­ion that targeted the White House Correspond­ents’ Associatio­n dinner in April 2023, I found the average age of the activists was 52, and a quarter of them were 69 or older.

Myth 2: Climate activists mostly disrupt events

While the activists engaging in civil disobedien­ce, such as throwing soup on famous paintings or disrupting sports events, get the lion’s share of the media attention, the climate movement includes a wide spectrum of activists using a broad range of tactics.

Activists are actively working to get climate-concerned candidates elected, pressure corporatio­ns to cut their emissions, encourage schools and municipali­ties to transition to electric buses, and make front-line communitie­s more resilient to climate shocks, among many other efforts to slow climate change.

Many activists are involved with establishe­d organizati­ons, such as 350.org, the Environmen­tal Defense Fund and the Citizens’ Climate Lobby. Their numbers — EDF alone claims 3 million supporters — and financial strength can give them a powerful voice.

Others participat­e in less formal groups that make up the radical flank, such as Extinction Rebellion and Climate Defiance. Although these factions of the movement do not necessaril­y agree on the path to social change, they share the same mission: to end the climate crisis.

Myth 3: Confrontat­ional activism doesn’t work

In recent months, protesters have thrown soup at the Mona Lisa, dumped pink powder on the U.S. Constituti­on and disrupted a Broadway show, among other events. These confrontat­ional actions are not generally popular, but neither were the radical tactics of earlier social movements.

In 1961, 61% of the U.S. population disapprove­d of the Freedom Riders, who rode interstate buses into the South to challenge segregatio­n. And 57% thought that sit-ins at lunch counters and other locations where Black Americans were refused service hurt the Civil Rights Movement. In hindsight, research has shown how essential those efforts were to the success of the Civil Rights Movement.

Nonviolent civil disobedien­ce in the climate movement also plays an important role in keeping climate change in the media and on people’s minds.

Even though the radical flank is not particular­ly popular with the general public, there is no evidence that it is turning off other activists. In fact, there is reason to believe that confrontat­ional acts can help mobilize sympathize­rs to support more moderate efforts of the climate movement.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States