Houston Chronicle

With FAA’s rules relaxed, drones take off over S. Texas fields

Farming, ranching could be ‘the new Silicon Valley’

- By Lynn Brezosky SAN ANTONIO EXPRESS-NEWS

TEXAS rice farmer Scott Savage is a gadget guy in a family that’s never shied away from the state of the art, but his decision to order a $2,000 camera-equipped drone two Christmase­s ago was made largely with visions of “neat stuff” photograph­y of harvests and bird’s-eye field shots.

It wasn’t until a few months ago that he realized the roughly 5-pound droid may have been one of the most useful purchases in hi rm’s five-generatio

Unlike Savage, who’s a licensed pilot, most farmers or ranchers using drones to scout for damage or track wayward cattle are technicall­y breaking the law. Several South Texas agricultur­al drone users declined to go on the record about it because they weren’t sure of the rules.

That’s about to change. Under relaxed Federal Aviation Administra­tion regulation­s released in June and set to g in ct Aug. 29, farmers om a s nation will be able to legally take their field scouting to the skies, opening wide a multibilli­on-dollar agricultur­al market that according to the Associatio­n for Unmanned Vehicle Systems could account for 80 percen t of all drone use.

Rice is a thirsty crop, and Savage’s 2,500-acre Matagorda County farm is flood irrigated with water controlled by the Lower Colorado River Authority, which for several years was so drought-stricken it couldn’t allot rice farmers any water at all.

The rains returned this year, but with a vengeance. Strong downpours have been known to wash out sec-

tions of the levees that hold the water in. That’s on top of pesky problems such as wild hogs that rip holes in the earthen walls while foraging for grubs.

Within minutes, Savage’s drone can spot those breaches, something that used to take hours or even days of scouting on foot or by fourwheele­r. It’s a crucial function. Now in their first full year of production since 2012, the Savages and other regional rice farmers know that if the LCRA detects major water waste, it can cut their water off.

“Where we’ve been using it more lately is actually ag use versus pleasure,” he said.

Under the new rules, drone operators will be able to obtain certificat­ion for commercial use via a written test and vetting by the Transporta­tion Security Administra­tion. Use will be limited to drones that are under 55 pounds and flying below speeds of 100 mph. They also must be kept within line of sight and can’t be flown over people, two restrictio­ns that don’t work well for growers wanting to scout large stretches of acreage where there may be farm laborers at work.

But agricultur­e industry representa­tives said the new regulation­s put valuable technology in reach for farmers or ranchers who don’t have a pilot’s license, which is needed to get a “section 333” waiver to fly unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or unmanned aircraft systems (UASs).

Only game in town

“There was only one game in town, and that was that section 333 waiver. So any farmers who were interested in utilizing this technology, using UAVs, drones, UAS, all the names we like to call them ... they had to go through this burdensome bureaucrat­ic waiver process,” said R. J. Karney, director of congressio­nal relations for the American Farm Bureau Federation. “It’s a great initial step. It’s really going to allow farmers to utilize an emerging technology that’s going to give farmers that new tool in the tool box that they can use for their precision agricultur­e techniques. That’s an exciting opportunit­y.”

Still, the Farm Bureau is hoping the rule will be tweaked to make it legal to fly the drones farther than they can be seen by the operator and to go over people working in the fields.

“This has gotten the technology in the farmer’s hands,” Karney said. “Now that they’re using it, they can use it in a safe manner, build a track record. We’ll be able to work with the FAA whenever the opportunit­y allows itself to tweak the rules to better allow farmers to maximize its potential.”

Over the long term, Karney said, the industry hopes the FAA will also revisit the 55-pound weight issue, which could open the industry to drones that can carry and spray pesticides and fertilizer­s.

“Really, the focus and the greatest benefit’s going to be coming down to this technology has the potential to allow farmers to be more efficient, more effective and a lot more environmen­tally friendly,” he said.

Asking for pointers

So many farmers have been asking Savage for pointers that he started doing tutorials.

“I’m 29, so I’m definitely more in sync with today’s technology,” he said. “My dad and my uncle and grandfathe­r, we all work together. Of course I’m trying to teach them and get them all updated to the 21st century. All new farmers and ranchers, they have to be technologi­cally savvy.”

According to a study by Lexington, Mass.-based WinterGree­n Research, the market for agricultur­al drones is expected to grow to as much as $3.7 billion by 2022, part of a wave of investment in agricultur­al technology that shows no sign of ebbing. Venture capital investment in agricultur­al technology start-ups reached $4.25 billion in 2015, double the capital invested in 2014.

“I tell people agricultur­e is the new Silicon Valley,” said Timothy Gertson, who grows rice and organic corn on his family farm in Lissie. “It’s the forefront of technology and informatio­n. It’s really the world’s biggest industry, and that’s where we can grow. Nobody’s making any more land, so we just have to be more efficient with what we do have, and at this point technology seems to be how we’re able to achieve these goals.”

Gertson, 31, plunked down about $1,200 for a drone last year. He now thinks he can develop a side business of using his drone to help other farmers survey for flood damage or locate cattle, services he’s so far done for free.

His drone has gotten a lot of attention, even from older farmers who aren’t as comfortabl­e with new technology.

“In fact, I have a farmer who’s over 70 years old who just bought one now. Because they’ve all been coming to me asking, ‘What do you got? How do you use it?’ ” Gerston said.

‘The older guys’

“With the older guys there’s a little more of a learning curve. They’re a little more apprehensi­ve about it,” he said. That wasn’t the case for Gerston. “I just took it out of the box and went with it,” he said.

He’s looking to upgrade to a newer version that can use infrared imagery to assess crop health, but that would take the purchase well beyond the novelty range.

“Twelve hundred, that’s fine,” Gerston said. “I don’t have to make money with that. You know, if all I do is enjoy it, that’s great. But if I’m going to spend 10 to 12 grand on a thing, I better make some money with it. That’s not a toy anymore.”

He said there was still a gap between acquiring the data and putting it to use.

“Say I had an infrared camera. I go out and fly autonomous­ly, map fields, get all that done for people and give it to them, but what are they going to pay me?” he said. There isn’t yet a viable pricing model for the data, he said. “There’s still, I guess, some analytics to be done there.”

Jason Ott, Nueces County extension agent for Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, said growers in his Coastal Bend region weren’t sold.

“There’s a lot of applicatio­ns that people are looking at where they can sense, see stress and that might help them identify some insect damage, things like that, but you know, right now the technology isn’t there,” he said.

But Mani Skaria, a retired Rio Grande Valley plant pathologis­t who has been studying use of aerial imagery for agricultur­al use for decades, said he was amazed at how far things have come.

Informatio­n that 15 years ago took a couple of hundred thousand dollars and required airplanes and pilots to get can now be collected by laymen using a $2,000 or less drone. He’s found some of the drone data to be better than what he receives contractin­g with a satellite service.

“I can get that informatio­n this afternoon on my laptop for a fraction of the cost. That’s the amazing part of it,” he said.

He’s so far been able to quickly spot and take care of emerging weeds and repair rabbit damage to the expensive drip irrigation system for his commercial micro-budded citrus groves.

“We were able to take care of it within a day,” he said.

Like other older farmers, he was introduced to drones by a younger farmer, who used his drone to solve a mysterious disappeara­nce of grapefruit­s from his trees.

“He was able to spot unwanted pickup trucks, trucks moving in his orchard,” Skaria said. “He followed them, and they were actually stealing fruit from his orchard. So he used the drone to follow these guys, and in the meantime he called the cops and they caught them . ... He’s a young tech guy, so he used his talent to explore what was going on.”

 ?? Scott Savage / Triangle Rice Farms ?? As a licensed pilot, Bay City rice farmer Scott Savage was able to experiment with agricultur­al drone use before the Federal Aviation Administra­tion loosened restrictio­ns.
Scott Savage / Triangle Rice Farms As a licensed pilot, Bay City rice farmer Scott Savage was able to experiment with agricultur­al drone use before the Federal Aviation Administra­tion loosened restrictio­ns.
 ?? Scott Savage / Triangle Rice Farms ?? Scott Savage’s drone can quickly spot breaches in farm levees, something that used to take hours or even days of scouting on foot or by four-wheeler.
Scott Savage / Triangle Rice Farms Scott Savage’s drone can quickly spot breaches in farm levees, something that used to take hours or even days of scouting on foot or by four-wheeler.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States