Houston Chronicle

Pricier plans, fewer options

Premiums to rise as insurers leave federal exchange

- By Jenny Deam and Ileana Najarro

Houstonian­s who purchase health insurance through the Affordable Care Act’s exchange will have dramatical­ly fewer options in 2017, with half the number of carriers participat­ing as last year. And premium prices will rise by more than $200 per month for some plans.

With a week to go before the fourth enrollment season opens on Nov. 1, the healthcare.gov website on Monday publicly previewed a slimmer array of plans that will be available for next year. The plans are generally more expensive, too. The national price average increased 25 percent in benchmark silver-plan premiums.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services officials sought to downplay the rate increases in a national press call. A statement specific to Texas pointed to the progress made in lowering the uninsured rate and said 84 percent of enrollees in Texas would qualify for subsidies to lower their premium costs.

“Thanks to financial assistance, the large majority of current marketplac­e consumers in Texas will be able to find plans with premiums between $50 and $100 per month,” Secretary Sylvia Burwell said in the statement. She also estimated that 252,000 Texans currently paying full price for plans off the exchange could find coverage on the

exchange in 2017.

For months, many have worried what next year’s health insurance landscape would look like as major insurers abruptly abandoned the federally mandated marketplac­e and those who remained demanded double-digit rate increases to counteract losses.

In Houston, at least, many of those fears appear to be realized.

Locally, the federal exchange for 2017 will feature plans from only three insurance companies: Molina Marketplac­e, Community Health Choice and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas. In 2016, there were seven.

The overall number of plans on the exchange has dropped to 26 next year from 52 in 2016, according to healthcare.gov.

“This is disconcert­ing,” Vivian Ho, an economist at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, said Monday.

Enrollees who do not qualify for the federal subsidies that rise along with premiums will face the full brunt of the hikes.

“The bigger concern is those who don’t qualify,” she said.

Another worry is shrinking competitio­n. “When more insurers compete, prices go down,” Ho said.

In April, UnitedHeal­thcare announced it would not offer any exchange plans in Texas. By August, Aetna and Cigna telegraphe­d they, too, were leaving the exchange in the state. Humana, previously vague about its plans, is nowhere to be found on the list released Monday.

All four carriers offered exchange plans to Houstonare­a residents last year. Cigna has said it will sell plans off the exchange, but that means customers would not be eligible for subsidies to lower the price.

“It’s unavoidabl­y true that the more carrier exits there are, the more involuntar­y changes there will be,” said Katherine Hempstead, senior adviser at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. “Without a doubt, more people will end up shopping who didn’t want to,” she added.

‘I am devastated’

That includes people like Ramon Cinco, 43, a middlescho­ol teacher and father of two in Channelvie­w. His employer-sponsored health care coverage is so expensive that the law allows him to acquire coverage on the exchange.

For 2014, the first year of enrollment, he signed up with Aetna but found the network of providers too narrow. His son suffers from asthma and often could not see the specialist­s he needed.

The following year, Cinco switched to Cigna, which had a much broader network. He loved that plan, but the insurer dropped it and he was forced to look for something new.

He returned to Aetna for 2016. Now, Aetna is pulling out, and he has to start over for the fourth time.

“I am devastated,” he said as classes ended Monday and he logged on to his computer. “I have to tell my wife the bad news. I’m not sure what in the world I’m going to do.”

He worries for his family. He’s not sure whether he should be angry with the insurance companies that keep raising prices and narrowing plans or with the officials in Washington who once promised affordable choices. “We don’t have a voice in that,” he sputtered in frustratio­n.

Temporary troubles?

The difference one year can make is stark. The average cost of a bronze plan for an individual without a subsidy in 2017 is $379, up $92. The average price for a silver plan will be $425, up $82.

The biggest jump comes in the higher-coverage gold plans. For 2017, the average gold plan will be $491 compared to $398 last year.

Also, one platinum plan was offered in 2016. This year there are none.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, the state’s largest insurer, showed the biggest price increases. Last month, the Texas Department of Insurance allowed the carrier’s request of a nearly 60 percent rate hike in some of its plans to stand.

Next year, the most expensive plan offered on the exchange comes from Blue Cross and Blue Shield at a price of $679.48. A year ago, the same plan was $463.95.

Ken Janda, president and CEO of Community Health Choice, which offers seven plans for 2017, said his company initially asked for a 6.9 percent rate increase last spring. But he revised the rate increase request to 20 percent when he found out that Community Health Choice would benefit less than expected under provisions in the Affordable Care Act designed to help some companies stabilize in the early days of transition.

Janda admits the hikes could have a chilling effect on new customers who do not either qualify for or know about subsidies, but he is confident existing customers will remain.

Many watching the unfolding drama predict the turmoil could be temporary. Insurers have argued they needed to adjust offerings and raise prices because they miscalcula­ted the cost of covering people on the exchange. Under the health care law, it is no longer legal to deny coverage to someone who has a chronic or pre-existing illness.

Opponents of the law likely will seize on this year’s troubles as proof it is failing, Ho said. But she emphasized that while some have been hurt by rising prices, more have been helped by finding coverage, sometimes for the first time.

“What people forget is, we can’t go back to how it was before,” she said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States