Houston Chronicle

Where the streetligh­ts are brightest in Houston Kinder Institute study shows income, race affect density

- Ryan Holeywell (@ RyanHoleyw­ell) is senior editor at Rice University’s Kinder Institute for Urban Research, and a former business reporter for the Houston Chronicle. This article first appeared on the Kinder Institute blog, The Urban Edge. By Ryan Holeywe

Streetligh­ts seem like they should be a benign topic. They’re unremarkab­le, familiar fixtures that are part of the backdrop of everyday urban life. But lately, they’ve been a contentiou­s topic for some Houstonian­s.

Two years ago, the city began the process of switching all 173,000-plus of its streetligh­ts from sodium bulbs (with their familiar, yellow glow) to LEDs, which emit a whiter and often brighter light.

Today, Houston is roughly halfway through that process. And a cadre of some critics have voiced opposition to the switch, mainly due to dissatisfa­ction with the brightness of the new bulbs. That’s a whole debate that the Kinder Institute won’t be weighing in on. But it does raise an interestin­g point: For some residents, brighter light isn’t always seen as a good thing.

In the Kinder Institute’s newest study, research fellow Dr. Heather O’Connell analyzes the location of Houston’s streetligh­ts to determine which areas have the highest concentrat­ions and which have the lowest.

It’s an important question because for many, streetligh­ts are a critical amenity. They make residents feel safer and more comfortabl­e. But on the other hand, they can be considered a nuisance, at least by some, or even a tool for surveillan­ce.

O’Connell’s study — the full version of which is available online — offers several fascinatin­g findings.

In Houston, each census block group has an average of 15 streetligh­ts per mile of

roadway. But there’s huge variation within the city. Some areas have 1 streetligh­t per mile or less. Others have as many as 47. So O’Connell tried to determine which areas had the most streetligh­ts, and which had the least.

She found that predominan­tly white neighborho­ods, on average, have lower concentrat­ions of streetligh­ts than black or Hispanic neighborho­ods. The trend, she writes, is “consistent with a surveillan­ce perspectiv­e regarding the placement of streetligh­ts.”

O’Connell also found two other trends, related to the intersecti­on of streetligh­ts and income, that at first glance may appear to contradict each other.

She found a close relationsh­ip between the concentrat­ion of streetligh­ts in an area and the median income of an

area. In other words, as average incomes of a community rise, so too does the number of streetligh­ts per mile of roadway. But she also found that neighborho­ods with higher poverty rates also have more streetligh­ts per mile.

How do those findings align? O’Connell says what’s really happening is that streetligh­ts are most common in economical­ly mixed neighborho­ods. Streetligh­ts aren’t equally prevalent in neighborho­ods with the same median income, if they have different poverty levels. Residents can request that the city conduct surveys of an area to determine whether it needs more lighting. O’Connell suggests that maybe more requests for streetligh­t surveys are made in areas where both median income and poverty levels are high.

But, more broadly, what does it all mean? What should we take away from the fact that there are wide variations in streetligh­t concentrat­ion, and those variations follow a very specific set of patterns?

On one hand, minority and high-poverty neighborho­ods have some of the highest levels of streetligh­t density in Houston. They are not being denied important infrastruc­ture, which is a good thing. But we also know that more light isn’t always seen as a positive by residents. O’Connell concludes:

“We should consider the possibilit­y that some areas of the city are overly lit in addition to being concerned about the places without enough lights. If it is true that some residents prefer moderate levels of lighting, then this could help explain some of the initially counterint­uitive results. The relative influence or power of certain neighborho­ods may explain why certain areas have fewer, but not too few, streetligh­ts, especially when considerin­g nonHispani­c white and higher income neighborho­ods.”

In other words, sometimes streetligh­ts may be seen as amenities; but other times, too many can be perceived as a nuisance. Either way, O’Connell writes, strong communicat­ion about the role of streetligh­ts is needed, given the impact they have on urban life.

 ?? Ethan Miller /Getty ?? Streetligh­ts do make residents feel safer and more comfortabl­e, but they can be considered a nuisance or a surveillan­ce tool.
Ethan Miller /Getty Streetligh­ts do make residents feel safer and more comfortabl­e, but they can be considered a nuisance or a surveillan­ce tool.
 ?? ALBANY TIMES UNION ?? Minority and high-poverty neighborho­ods have some of the highest levels of streetligh­t density in Houston.
ALBANY TIMES UNION Minority and high-poverty neighborho­ods have some of the highest levels of streetligh­t density in Houston.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States