Houston Chronicle

A chart compares the current health law with the Republican­s’ House and Senate versions.

- By Carolyn Y. Johnson WASHINGTON POST

Major health care industry groups largely fell into two camps Thursday when Republican­s released their Affordable Care Act repeal: those that criticized the bill and those that preferred to say nothing at all.

For the health insurance industry, the bill is a mixed bag. The major trade associatio­n for health insurers, America’s Health Insurance Plans, declined to issue a specific response to the bill, saying it was still evaluating it.

But the proposed legislatio­n contains several provisions that the industry has been fighting for, including a tax repeal worth $145 billion over 10 years to the industry and a guarantee that billions of dollars in federal subsidies would be paid in 2018 and 2019 to stabilize plans in the ACA’s marketplac­es before they are phased out. There are also two funds, adding up to $112 billion over a decade, to stabilize the market and make insurance more affordable.

“Whatever insurers have been doing to lobby paid off,” said Larry Levitt, a senior vice president at the Kaiser Family Foundation.

‘It’s no better’

But it also holds major drawbacks, particular­ly for firms that provide Medicaid coverage. Companies that sell commercial insurance in the marketplac­es set up by the ACA stand to benefit in the short-term, although long-term questions loom over the stability of the marketplac­e that the bill would set up. Meanwhile, health insurers that provide Medicaid coverage stand to lose if millions of the program’s recipients become ineligible.

“I’m very unhappy with what came out today. In the long run, it’s no better, and in some aspects, it’s even worse than the House bill,” said John Baackes, chief executive of L.A. Care Health Plan, a California health plan with 2 million Medicaid members who spearheade­d a sharply critical letter to lawmakers arguing against Medicaid cuts earlier this week. He noted that while there had been significan­t publicity around the individual market where 12 million people buy insurance, Medicaid covers nearly 75 million people.

“What we see in the Senate and House bill is just awful — it’s just awful for poor people,” Baackes said.

The final assessment of how many Americans would lose coverage if the bill passes will come next week from the Congressio­nal Budget Office, and some industry groups said they were reserving judgment until then. But several health policy experts said they expected the losses, driven largely by Medicaid cuts, to be on par with those in the House bill. The CBO projected that under the House bill, 23 million additional people would be uninsured in 2026 as compared to if the Affordable Care Act remains law.

“When you take a step back and think about the size of these cuts, they are just unpreceden­ted,” said Dan Mendelson, president of Avalere Health, a consulting firm. “It’s hard even for policy analysts to estimate how fundamenta­l those cuts will be.”

Concern about those losses was echoed by another major industry that will suffer huge economic consequenc­es if millions of people lose coverage: hospitals.

“Now is the time for the Senate to hit reset and make key improvemen­ts to this legislatio­n,” Chip Kahn, president of the Federation of American Hospitals said in a statement.

Steve Shapiro, chief medical and scientific officer of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center said the bill would take a toll on hospitals, increasing the amount of “bad debt” — care they must give for free — because patients lack insurance or can’t pay their bills. He said the toll would fall especially hard on rural hospitals, many of which are fighting an opioid epidemic.

Long-term problems

The biggest questions the bill will raise are in the long-term, when the new marketplac­es would be set up with less generous subsidies that are structured slightly differentl­y than the Affordable Care Act. The bill effectivel­y eliminates the mandate that people carry insurance or pay a penalty and does not replace that provision with any other incentive to try and get healthy people to sign up. That leaves big question marks over whether the insurance market set up by the law will have enough healthy and sick people to function.

The Medicaid cuts, too, will be felt over time, since they would establish caps based on recent spending and grow more slowly than medical costs.

“It kicks the can down the road,” Mendelson said. “There’s going to be a lot of political pain in 2020.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States