Houston Chronicle

Officers won’t face charges

Grand jury declines to indict pair in fatal shooting of armed man

- By Brian Rogers

Two Houston police officers will not face charges in the fatal shooting of Alva Braziel, a case that stirred community tensions last summer until video showed the Houston man waving a gun in the middle of Cullen Boulevard.

The decision by a Harris County grand jury Thursday not to indict the officers in the July 9, 2016, shooting, however, drew sharp rebukes from Braziel’s widow and local activists who had argued the Houston man should not have been shot.

“It’s not fair,” Nikki Braziel said. “They could have gotten them on capital murder, on manslaught­er, anything. But they didn’t.”

The decision effectivel­y clears the two police officers of any wrongdoing in a local shooting that emerged during last year’s spate of fatal police altercatio­ns across the country and the fatal ambush of five officers in Dallas.

The volatile climate and growing hostility on social media prompted Mayor Sylvester Turner two weeks after the shooting to order the release of 18 minutes of video footage collected from nearby surveillan­ce cameras and the officers’ body cameras.

The surveillan­ce video captured the incident from afar, but was enlarged to show Braziel holding his hands in the air as the police vehicle rolls up and

stops about 12:40 a.m.

The body cam videos show Braziel lying in the street at the intersecti­on of Cullen and Ward still holding the gun in his hand. The officers can be heard on the video telling other officers they thought Braziel was trying to flag them down until he pointed the gun at them.

The body cameras did not begin recording until after the 38-year-old man was shot, because officers did not turn them on when they stepped out of the patrol car. Police Chief Art Acevedo said recently he is trying to acquire body cameras that will turn on automatica­lly when officers leave their vehicles.

Not everyone was satisfied with the video evidence, however. Ashton Woods of Black Lives Matter Houston said Thursday that he and his fellow activists would stand behind the Braziel family.

“This no-bill is not a surprise,” he said. “It is not a surprise because we know this is a system that protects the police more often than not.”

He criticized Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg’s handling of the case, though he supported her bid for office last year.

“I never expected her office to be perfect, but there had to be some type of repercussi­on for this,” he said. “This is indicative of the fact that there is little public regard for black lives.”

Case heard once before

The decision came after the grand jury heard the case for a second time against the officers, identified as 13-year department veteran L. Lopez and nineyear veteran Officer E. Macias, both of whom worked in the gang division.

The first time the case was presented to a grand jury, Braziel’s family members said they were unaware of the proceeding­s and asked for the opportunit­y to present additional informatio­n, including possible new evidence, Ogg said in a news release.

That situation was remedied by the unusual step of having a grand jury reconsider a case in which grand jurors declined to indict.

“It is our duty to be transparen­t and ensure that grand jurors have the opportunit­y to make informed decisions on whether a crime has been committed,” Ogg said in a prepared statement. “These decisions can impact people’s lives forever.”

She said grand juries, which are comprised of Harris County citizens, review all police shootings.

“This enables the community, not prosecutor­s or police, to ultimately determine whether a person should be indicted,” Ogg said.

She said the case was evaluated and presented to the grand jury by a senior prosecutor with experience in civil-rights investigat­ions.

Mayor intervened

Citing growing inaccuraci­es on social media, Turner intervened in the case to order release of the video. He said he wanted the public to see the videos to confirm that Braziel had a gun when he was killed and to quell protests that might be based on the false premise that Houston police had shot an unarmed black man.

Braziel, a convicted felon, was not legally able to carry a gun.

In June 2001, he was charged with the unlawful carry of a weapon. According to court records, he accepted a plea bargain and was sentenced to 60 days in the Harris County Jail.

Two weeks later, he pleaded guilty to a felony charge for possession of phencyclid­ine, known as PCP or angel dust. He was sentenced to six months in prison. That appears to be the conviction that made him a felon.

He was also charged as a felon in possession of a weapon in 2004, but that case was dismissed.

On Thursday, his widow said Braziel’s past should not have been considered in the case.

“They had video showing that Alva Braziel did not point a gun like the mayor said on TV,” said Nikki Braziel. “They had video of officers saying they don’t know what happened, why they shot him.”

She also criticized Ogg, saying the district attorney did not care about the black community.

“How can you acquit after 16 shots?” she said. “I just don’t understand how they no-billed this case.” Keri Blakinger contribute­d to this report. brian.rogers@chron.com twitter.com/brianjroge­rs

 ?? Mark Mulligan / Houston Chronicle file ?? Nikki Braziel, widow of Alva Braziel, wondered, “How can you acquit after 16 shots? I just don’t understand how they no-billed in this case.”
Mark Mulligan / Houston Chronicle file Nikki Braziel, widow of Alva Braziel, wondered, “How can you acquit after 16 shots? I just don’t understand how they no-billed in this case.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States