Houston Chronicle

Transgende­r defeat

Trump’s ban amounts to a betrayal of vows made during his race for the presidency.

-

On the anniversar­y of the day President Truman integrated our nation’s armed forces, our current president has slammed the door on a group of American citizens whose minority status will deny them the opportunit­y to serve in their country’s defense.

President Trump has announced a ban on transgende­r people serving in the U.S. military. This shameful proclamati­on not only insults thousands of men and women currently serving in uniform, it also denigrates a misunderst­ood minority group solely for political purposes. And it does nothing to make our country safer.

Although Trump claims he reached his decision after consulting with leaders of the armed forces, his announceme­nt apparently caught the Pentagon by surprise. On orders from Defense Secretary James Mattis, military officials had been conducting a study on transgende­r troops in the armed forces, and Mattis himself had announced he would delay a decision on the matter until the end of the year. What’s more, recruiters had been scrambling to sign people up for service, so eliminatin­g a pool of potential candidates seemed counter-productive to the president’s stated goal of building up the nation’s military forces.

Trump cited “tremendous medical costs and disruption” as justificat­ions for reinstatin­g the transgende­r ban that was lifted under President Obama, but those excuses don’t hold up under scrutiny. A study conducted by the RAND Corporatio­n last year concluded allowing transgende­r people into the armed forces would have a minimal impact on health care costs and military readiness. About 2,400 of our nation’s 1.3 million active-duty members of the military are transgende­r, the study concluded, raising health care expenses an estimated $2.4 million to $8.4 million; that’s an increase of about one-tenth of one percent. Other countries that recruit transgende­r personnel — like the United Kingdom, Israel and Australia — reported little or no impact on military readiness.

Trump’s announceme­nt amounts to a betrayal of campaign promises made during his race for the presidency. At the Republican National Convention, he vowed he would “do everything in my power to protect our LGBT community.” As a candidate, he wrote a message on Twitter saying, “Thank you to the LGBT community! I will fight for you …” But after his inaugurati­on, the White House has rolled back protection­s for transgende­r schoolchil­dren and didn’t even recognize LGBT Pride Month. Now, a president who promised to fight for transgende­r Americans has slapped them in the face by essentiall­y declaring them unfit to fight for their country.

The motive seems entirely political. A president who’s a master of media distractio­n instantly deflected attention from his bullying of the attorney general and his frantic efforts to stop the investigat­ion into his campaign’s contacts with Russia. The move also throws red meat to a base of voters who backed Trump because they were uncomforta­ble with the pace of cultural change during the Obama years.

It also cruelly denies transgende­r Americans the honor of wearing their nation’s uniform and bearing arms in defense of our country. Amid the avalanche of criticism prompted by the ban, U.S. Sen. Jack Reed, D-Rhode Island, said it best: “In the land of the free and the home of the brave, every American who is brave enough to serve their country should be free to do so.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States