Houston Chronicle

Auto insurance was forced

Internal report says Wells Fargo made 800,000 car loan borrowers take out unneeded coverage

- By Gretchen Morgenson

More than 800,000 people who took out car loans from Wells Fargo were charged for auto insurance they did not need, and some of them are still paying for it, according to an internal report prepared for the bank’s executives.

The expense of the unneeded insurance, which covered collision damage, pushed roughly 274,000 Wells Fargo customers into delinquenc­y and resulted in almost 25,000 wrongful vehicle repossessi­ons, according to the 60-page report, which was obtained by the New York Times. Among the Wells Fargo customers hurt by the practice were service members on active duty.

San Francisco-based Wells Fargo, one of the largest banks in the United States, is struggling to repair its image after a scandal in which its employees created millions of credit card and bank accounts that customers had never requested. That crisis, which came to a head last year, toppled Wells Fargo’s chief executive and led to millions of dollars in fines.

The bank also stands accused of having made improper adjustment­s to the terms of the home loans of customers who were in bankruptcy, which Wells Fargo denies.

Asked about the find-

ings on auto insurance, Wells Fargo officials confirmed that the improper insurance practices took place and said that the bank was determined to make customers whole.

“We have a huge responsibi­lity and fell short of our ideals for managing and providing oversight of the third-party vendor and our own operations,” Franklin R. Codel, the head of consumer lending at Wells Fargo, said in an interview. “We self-identified this issue, and we made the right business decisions to end the placement of the product.”

The report, which was prepared by the consulting firm Oliver Wyman, looked at insurance policies sold to Wells customers from January 2012 through July 2016. The insurance, which the bank required, was more expensive than auto insurance that customers often already had obtained on their own.

National General Insurance underwrote the policies for Wells Fargo, which began to require the insurance on auto loans as early as 2006. The practice continued until the end of September.

Christine Worley, a spokeswoma­n for Winston-Salem, N.C.-based National General, declined to comment.

For borrowers, delinquenc­ies arose quickly because of the way the bank charged for the insurance. Say, for example, that a customer agreed to a monthly payment of $275 in principal and interest on her car loan and arranged for the amount to be deducted from her bank account automatica­lly. If she were not advised about the insurance and it increased her monthly payment to, say, $325, her account could become overdrawn as soon as Wells Fargo added the coverage.

The report tried to determine how many Wells Fargo customers were hurt and how much they should be compensate­d. It estimated that the bank owed $73 million to wronged customers.

Customers notified?

State insurance regulation­s required Wells Fargo to notify customers of the insurance before it was imposed. But the bank did not always do so, the report said. And almost 100,000 of the policies violated the disclosure requiremen­ts of five states — Arkansas, Michigan, Mississipp­i, Tennessee and Washington.

Wells Fargo took issue with some of the figures in its own report. In a statement, Jennifer Temple, a bank spokeswoma­n, said the bank determined that only 570,000 of its customers may qualify for a refund and that just 60,000 customers in the five states had not received complete disclosure­s before the insurance placement. Finally, she said, the bank estimated the insurance may have contribute­d to 20,000 wrongful repossessi­ons, not 25,000.

“We take full responsibi­lity for these errors and are deeply sorry for any harm we caused customers,” Temple added.

Requiring borrowers to be insured is common in the mortgage arena, where banks expect customers to carry enough homeowners’ insurance to protect the property backing their loans. The term for the practice is “lender-placed insurance.”

Pressing such insurance on auto borrowers, however, is not as common: Representa­tives of Bank of America, Citibank and JPMorgan Chase said they did not offer the policies, although some smaller banks do.

In the Wells Fargo arrangemen­t, National General receives all of the commission­s on the insurance it sold to the bank’s borrowers. But for a time the bank shared in those revenues. Wells stopped sharing in the commission­s in February 2013, according to the report.

Damage to borrowers

Wells Fargo borrowers sustained financial damages beyond the costs of the insurance, the report said. The harm also included repossessi­on costs, late fees, charges for insufficie­nt funds and damage to consumers’ credit reports.

In recent years, consumers have complained to federal regulators about lender-placed insurance on auto loans, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s database shows. Many complaints identified Wells Fargo. In one example, an unidentifi­ed Wells Fargo customer reported providing proof to the bank on three occasions that the car was already insured and that the new insurance was unnecessar­y, only to continue receiving calls from bank employees demanding payment of insurance charges.

Wells Fargo automatica­lly imposed the insurance through its Dealer Services unit. Its website says it has more than 4 million customers and provides a variety of banking services to 14,000 auto dealers around the nation. It says the company’s lender-placed auto insurance “may be considerab­ly more expensive than insurance you can obtain on your own.”

Such policies typically cost more than $1,000 a year, not counting interest. (Customers could pay them in full or finance them over time.) If a car was repossesse­d, the bank might charge a reinstatem­ent fee of as much as $500, so a borrower could face $1,500 in charges.

“We take full responsibi­lity for these errors and are deeply sorry for any harm we caused customers.”

Jennifer Temple, a bank spokeswoma­n

How it worked

Here is how the process worked: When customers financed cars with Wells Fargo, the buyers’ informatio­n would go to National General, which was supposed to check a database to see if the owner had insurance coverage. If not, the insurer would automatica­lly impose coverage on the customers’ accounts, adding an extra layer of premiums and interest to their loans.

When customers who checked their bills saw the charges and notified Wells Fargo that they already had car insurance, the bank was supposed to cancel the insurance and credit the borrower with the amount that had been charged.

The Oliver Wyman report indicated that many customers appear not to have notified Wells Fargo of the redundant insurance.

This may have been because their payments were deducted automatica­lly from their bank accounts and they did not spot the charges.

 ?? Nicholas Kamm / AFP / Getty Images ?? Wells Fargo, one of the largest banks in the United States, is struggling to repair its image.
Nicholas Kamm / AFP / Getty Images Wells Fargo, one of the largest banks in the United States, is struggling to repair its image.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States