Houston Chronicle

New, but not improved, wording for ‘Transfer on Death’ deed

- RONALD LIPMAN Ronald Lipman, of Houston law firm Lipman & Associates, is board certified in estate planning and probate law by the Texas Board of Legal Specializa­tion. Email questions to stateyourc­ase@ lipmanpc.com

The informatio­n in this column is intended to provide a general understand­ing of the law, not as legal advice. Readers with legal problems, including those whose questions are addressed here, should consult attorneys for advice on their particular circumstan­ces.

Q: I have a valid Texas will. My only child is to inherit all my assets at the time of my death. Is there a way for my daughter to inherit the house without going through probate? Would filling out the “Transfer on Death” deed suffice?

A: The Transfer on Death deed form should work for you, assuming you don’t have any other assets that require probate.

However, it is worth noting that the Texas Legislatur­e just made a number of changes to the statutory form. These changes take effect Sept. 1. If you sign and record the Transfer on Death deed after that date, be sure to use the language found in the revised form.

The changes were made to address the problem of what happens if a beneficiar­y named in the deed is not living. For instance, in your situation, who do you want to inherit your home if your daughter does not survive you? Would you want the home to pass to your daughter’s children, or to someone else or several other people?

While these changes are a good idea, the problem with the new language is that much of it is difficult to understand, even though the form was created for people to use without an attorney. Here is one sentence from the statutory form:

“If no primary beneficiar­y survives me and the anti-lapse election is not chosen or that election is chosen, but a deceased primary beneficiar­y is not a child or other descendant of mine or of one or both of my parents, I grant and convey to the alternate beneficiar­y or beneficiar­ies my share in the property that otherwise would have transferre­d to the deceased primary beneficiar­y, to have and hold forever.”

I had to read this over and over to understand what it means. It will no doubt create confusion for the public, and I predict that when the Legislatur­e meets again in two years, attempts will be made to simplify this language.

Q: A relative died, and in his will he left everything to his mother. All of his property was acquired after he was divorced. His ex-wife was named executor of the will, and she is holding up the probate. Can she be removed as executor?

A: If your relative wrote his will while he was still married to his future ex-wife, then under Texas law she is automatica­lly removed as executor. The alternate executor would be the one to serve.

But if he wrote the will after they were already divorced, then she would still be the executor. In this case, if she refuses to act and won’t start the probate, your relative’s mother can hire a lawyer who will take steps in court to force her to act.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States