Houston Chronicle

Trump requests imperil DACA deal

Democrats scoff at newly released policy wish list on immigratio­n

- David Nakamura WASHINGTON POST

WASHINGTON — The Trump administra­tion released a list of hard-line immigratio­n principles late Sunday that could threaten to derail a deal in Congress to allow hundreds of thousands of younger undocument­ed immigrants to remain legally in the country.

The administra­tion’s wish list includes the funding of a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, a crackdown on the influx of Central American minors and curbs on federal grants to sanctuary cities, according to a document distribute­d to Congress and obtained by the Washington Post.

The demands were quickly denounced by Democratic leaders in Congress who had hoped to forge a deal with President Trump to protect younger immigrants, known as “dreamers,” who were brought to the United States illegally as children. Trump announced plans last month to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, an Obama-era program that had provided twoyear work permits to the dreamers that he called “unconstitu­tional.”

About 690,000 immigrants are enrolled in DACA, but their work permits are set to begin expiring in March. Trump had met last month with Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and agreed to try to strike a deal, worrying immigra-

tion hawks who feared that Trump would support a bill that would allow dreamers to gain full legal status without asking for significan­t border security measures in return.

The list released by the administra­tion, however, would represent a major tightening of immigratio­n laws. Cuts to legal immigratio­n also are included.

“The administra­tion can’t be serious about compromise or helping the Dreamers if they begin with a list that is anathema to the Dreamers, to the immigrant community and to the vast majority of Americans,” Schumer and Pelosi said in a joint statement Sunday evening. “We told the President at our meeting that we were open to reasonable border security measures ... but this list goes so far beyond what is reasonable. This proposal fails to represent any attempt at compromise.”

Dems want narrow deal

In a conference call with reporters, White House aides described the proposals as a necessary step to protect public safety and jobs for Americanbo­rn workers, which was a centerpiec­e of Trump’s campaign. The president has moved to tighten border security since taking office through a series of executive orders, including curbs on immigratio­n and refugees from some majority-Muslim nations and an increase in deportatio­ns from the interior of the country.

The number of immigrants who have attempted to enter the country illegally across the Mexican border has dropped sharply since Trump took office.

Democrats had hoped that Trump, who had equivocate­d over the DACA program before deciding to terminate it in the face of a legal challenge from Texas, would be open to crafting a narrow legislativ­e deal to protect the dreamers. But White House aides emphasized they expect Congress to include the principles released Sunday in any package deal, a nonstarter for Democrats and some moderate Republican­s.

“We ask that the priorities be included in any” deal for DACA, White House legislativ­e director Marc Short said in the conference call.

‘Fixing all the issues’

Immigratio­n hardliners expressed support for the administra­tion’s immigratio­n proposals. Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), chair of the House Judiciary Committee, praised the administra­tion for “a serious proposal” and said that “we cannot fix the DACA problem without fixing all of the issues that led to the underlying problem of illegal immigratio­n in the first place.”

Trump had said several times over the past month that he did not expect a DACA deal to include funding for a border wall, emphasizin­g that the money could be included in separate legislatio­n. But ensuring funding for the wall, which is projected to cost more than $25 billion, is the first priority on the list. White House aides declined to specify during the call with reporters about how much money the president would expect from Congress.

The administra­tion also is proposing changes aimed at reducing the flow of tens of thousands of unaccompan­ied minors from Central America who have entered the United States illegally in recent years. Immigrant rights groups have said the minors, as well as women and families, have fled gang violence and other dangers in El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras.

Under current law, minors who arrive from noncontigu­ous nations are afforded greater protection­s than those from Mexico or Canada, but the Trump administra­tion is proposing to treat them all the same in a bid to be able to deport the minors more quickly. Such proposals are likely to face fierce resistance from Democrats and human rights groups.

The administra­tion also has sought to increase pressure on “sanctuary cities” which refuse, in some cases, to cooperate with federal immigratio­n agents seeking personal informatio­n on illegal immigrants who’ve committed other crimes in their jurisdicti­ons. Under the immigratio­n priorities released Sunday, the administra­tion is proposing that Congress withhold federal grants to such jurisdicti­ons and that it clarify the authority of state and local jurisdicti­ons to honor detainers issued by Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t.

“There is no justificat­ion for releasing a public safety threat back into the public,” said Thomas Homan, the acting director of ICE. “We will not stop illegal immigratio­n unless we stop the pull factors that are driving it ... Entering this country illegally is a crime but there are no consequenc­es for sneaking past the border or overstayin­g visas.”

Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Tex.), vice chairman of the Congressio­nal Hispanic Caucus, said that “Congress should reject this warped, anti-immigrant policy wish list. The White House wants to use Dreamers as bargaining chips to achieve the administra­tion’s deportatio­n and detention goals.

Trump aides said the administra­tion’s priorities are imperative because legalizing the dreamers without fixing other parts of the immigratio­n system would allow the problem to continue to recur. The last major legislativ­e overhaul to the nation’s immigratio­n laws came in 1986, which included a path to citizenshi­p for millions of undocument­ed immigrants, but there are more than 11 million immigrants living in the country illegally today.

Giving Congress time

But the White House’s list of immigratio­n principles moves the debate over the fate of the dreamers toward the prospect of broader comprehens­ive reform. Efforts to forge a comprehens­ive bill failed under the past two presidents, George W. Bush and Barack Obama.

During his campaign, Trump had threatened to end DACA on his first day in office, but he equivocate­d for months, suggesting that the decision over the fate of the dreamers was among the most difficult he faced. After Texas and several other states announced plans to sue the administra­tion over the program, Trump moved to end DACA but said he would hold off the most drastic measures for six months to give Congress time to forge a legislativ­e solution.

“We would expect Congress to include all the reforms in any package that addresses the status of the DACA recipients,” said one White House aide on the conference call who was not authorized to speak on the record. “Other views had their fair day in the democratic process.”

Noting the Republican­s swept the White House and both chambers of Congress last November, the aide added: “The American public voted for the reforms included in this package.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States