Reprieve at risk
More than 300,000 Central Americans and Haitians in the U.S. could lose their protection from deportation.
WASHINGTON — More than 300,000 Central Americans and Haitians living in the United States under a form of temporary permission no longer need to be shielded from deportation, the State Department told Homeland Security officials this week, a few days ahead of a highly anticipated DHS announcement on renewal of that protection.
On Tuesday, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson sent a letter to acting DHS secretary Elaine Duke stating that conditions in Central America and Haiti used to justify the protection no longer necessitate a reprieve for the migrants, some of whom have been allowed to live and work in the United States for 20 years under a program known as Temporary Protected Status (TPS).
Tillerson’s assessment, required by law, has not been made public, but its recommendations were confirmed by several administration officials familiar with its contents. The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity.
DHS has until Monday to announce its plans for roughly 57,000 Hondurans and 2,500 Nicaraguans whose TPS protections will expire in early January. Although most arrived here illegally, they were exempted from deportation after Hurricane Mitch devastated Central America in 1998. Their TPS protections have been renewed routinely since then, in some cases following additional natural disasters and resulting insecurity.
Congress established TPS in 1990 to protect foreign nationals from being returned to their countries amid instability and precarious conditions caused by natural disasters or armed conflict.
Trump administration officials have repeatedly noted that the program was meant to be temporary — not a way for people to become long-term residents of the United States.
Tillerson’s assessment is consistent with broader administration efforts to reduce immigration to the U.S. and comply with legal restrictions that it maintains have been loosely enforced in the past.
“It is fair to say that this administration is interpreting the law, exactly as it is, which the previous one did not,” an administration official said.