Houston Chronicle

Atelier Swarovski turns to man-made gems

- By Kathleen Beckett | New York Times

Early this year, when Nadja Swarovski was deciding how to celebrate the 10th anniversar­y of Atelier Swarovski, she had a vision.

“I wanted to do something responsibl­e, sustainabl­e and forward-thinking,” she said, to celebrate the line known for collaborat­ions with design leaders like Karl Lagerfeld, Zaha Hadid and Christophe­r Kane.

The creation of a fine jewelry collection was the beginning, but then Swarovski, who is Atelier Swarovski’s artistic director as well as a member of the company’s executive board, went further.

Instead of designs made solely with crystals — the sparklers linked with the name Swarovski as tissue is to Kleenex — she decided to mix in diamonds and emeralds, too. But these were gems created in laboratori­es. Just don’t classify them with inexpensiv­e diamond substitute­s like cubic zirconia, moissanite or rhinestone­s — or crystal.

Swarovski called the concept “conscious luxury,” a choice to use laboratory created gems because they “have a lower impact on the environmen­t and society,” she said. “People want to know where their products come from. People care.”

Man-made diamonds have been around for more than 60 years. “The first scientific discovery of growing a diamond in a lab was in late 1954,” said Susan Jacques, the president and chief executive of the Gemologica­l Institute of America. But it’s only in the last 10 years that the process has been refined to such a degree, she said, that many of the diamonds that come out of the lab are virtually the same as those that come out of the mine.

Tom Moses, the institute’s executive vice president and chief laboratory and research officer, said, “We judge diamonds by the four Cs,” the metrics of cut, color, clarity and carat establishe­d by the institute in the mid-20th century. “The goal of labs is to grow something perfectly clear, transparen­t and colorless, without any occlusions visible at 10-times magnificat­ion.” (Occlusion is an industry term for imperfecti­ons.)

Laboratori­es rely on the same elements as nature — carbon, high pressure and intense heat — to create diamonds. But good ones can’t just be churned out.

“The slower the growth rate, the higher the quality,” Moses said. “Too slow a growth has not been commercial­ly feasible,” but, with technologi­cal improvemen­ts, the laboratori­es believe they have succeeded.

Man-made diamonds are virtually indistingu­ishable from the real thing, with the same pure white color, total clarity, hardness, longevity, brilliance and what the pros call fire, Jacques said.

“To the naked eye, they are identical,” she said, adding that the instrument capable of distinguis­hing between natural and labcreated diamonds is very expensive and not common; the institute has one, but most jewelers do not.

It is easier to discern the difference between a mined emerald and one produced in a laboratory. “Real emeralds have natural occlusions,” Jacques said. The grown ones don’t; they are simply “too perfect,” she said.

Man-made gems received increased attention after the 2006 film “Blood Diamond,” a fictional story based on illicit diamond trade and its funding of a civil war in Sierra Leone. After starring in the film, Leonardo Di Caprio invested in the Diamond Foundry, which produces lab-grown diamonds in San Francisco, and he is now one of its ambassador­s.

“Grown diamonds can be even better than real diamonds in terms of the ecological and social costs,” said Jeremy Scholz, the company’s chief technology officer. “Our diamonds are grown in an environmen­tal factory. The energy that we use is from 100 percent renewable sources. It’s a sustainabl­e method. I’m not sure mining companies can say the same thing.”

Jacques countered that mining companies are not irresponsi­ble about the way they treat the land they mine or its surroundin­g communitie­s, donating to local schools and hospitals. And, she added, real diamonds have a distinctiv­e appeal: “They’ve been growing in the earth for billions of years,” a quality more seductive than being created yesterday in a test tube, she said.

As for price, there is little difference between lab-grown and mined diamonds. Scholz acknowledg­ed that man-made diamonds are expensive to produce and are only about 10-30 percent cheaper than natural ones of similar size.

But François Le Troquer, Atelier Swarovski’s vice president and managing director, said he expected prices for lab-produced diamonds to be as much as 50 percent less than those for mined ones in the future.

Proponents of manmade diamonds say there is another reason the gems’ popularity will increase: Some diamond mines are almost played out.

“The life of a mine is 25 to 30 years,” Jacques said, noting that the Argyle mine in Australia, the world’s largest single producer of diamonds, has only a few productive years left.

New mines have been discovered in Botswana and Canada, she added, but their output won’t compensate for Argyle’s loss.

So even though Swarovski has a division that sells mined gemstones to other jewelers, the company, which had $3.93 billion in revenue in 2016, has turned to man-made stones.

“We were driven to use materials that embody the innovation rooted in our brand,” Swarovski said of the fine jewelry collection, adding that the lab-created diamonds and emeralds “represent that spirit of exploratio­n.”

The gems grown for the collection were gathered from several sources, including Diamond Foundry, then cut by Swarovski specialist­s to match its artists’ designs.

Pieces were produced in Paris by Cambour, the celebrated jewelry fabricatio­n company.

Inside Cambour’s unremarkab­le workshop building in the 10th Arrondisse­ment, artisans on one summer day assembled jewelry for Chanel, Van Cleef & Arpels and some of “the biggest names on the Place Vendôme,” said Sandra Bouteille-Tuszynski, the company’s head of accounts receivable, who previously worked at Hermès and Bulgari.

Pieces are available only through special order on www.atelierswa­rovski.com, with prices from $3,950 to $96,000.

In 2018, the company plans to adapt the designs, using crystal, cubic zirconia and silver, and sell them for a starting price of about $395.

 ?? Dmitry Kostyukov / The New York Times ?? Swarovski’s new line touts a “conscious luxury.”
Dmitry Kostyukov / The New York Times Swarovski’s new line touts a “conscious luxury.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States