Houston Chronicle

Efforts to oust Sessions probed

Mueller looking at Trump steps during summer

- By Devlin Barrett, Josh Dawsey and Rosalind S. Helderman

WASHINGTON — Special Counsel Robert Mueller has been investigat­ing a period of time last summer when President Donald Trump seemed determined to drive Attorney General Jeff Sessions from his job, according to people familiar with the matter who said a key area of interest for the inquiry is whether those efforts were part of a monthslong pattern of attempted obstructio­n of justice.

In recent months, Mueller’s team has questioned witnesses in detail about Trump’s private comments and state of mind in late July and early August of last year, around the time he issued a series of tweets belittling his “beleaguere­d” attorney general, these people

said. The thrust of the questions was to determine whether the president’s goal was to oust Sessions in order to pick a replacemen­t who would exercise control over the investigat­ion into possible coordinati­on between Russia and Trump associates during the 2016 election, these people said.

The issue of Sessions’ tortured relationsh­ip with the president reared up again Wednesday when Trump tweeted: “Why is A.G. Jeff Sessions asking the Inspector General to investigat­e potentiall­y massive FISA abuse . ... Why not use Justice Department lawyers? DISGRACEFU­L!”

Sessions usually opts not to respond to such criticism, but in this case he did. Trump’s criticism faulted the attorney general for not more aggressive­ly pursuing claims that the FBI and Justice Department may have misled a foreign surveillan­ce court on a politicall­y sensitive case in the waning days of the Obama administra­tion. Sessions insisted in his statement that he had reacted appropriat­ely by referring the matter to the department’s inspector general for a possible review of how the surveillan­ce case was handled.

“As long as I am the Attorney General, I will continue to discharge my duties with integrity and honor, and this Department will continue to do its work in a fair and impartial manner according to the law and Constituti­on,’’ he said in the statement.

It’s no secret in Washington that the relationsh­ip between the pair has been badly broken for months. Trump has repeatedly issued public broadsides, calling Sessions “weak” or criticizin­g his leadership of the Justice Department, despite the attorney general’s frequent proclamati­ons of devotion to the president’s agenda on immigratio­n and crime.

Behind the scenes, Trump has derisively referred to Sessions as “Mr. Magoo,” a cartoon character who is elderly, myopic and bumbling, according to people with whom he has spoken. Trump has told associates that he has hired the best lawyers for his entire life, but is stuck with Sessions, who is not defending him and is not sufficient­ly loyal.

While Sessions has told assojustic­e, ciates that he had been wounded by the attacks, he has also insisted he’s not going to resign, so the cold war continues.

On the anniversar­y of Sessions’ confirmati­on earlier this month, senior aides decided to buy Sessions a bulletproo­f vest with his name emblazoned on it as a gift, according to a person familiar with the matter.

While there is a soap opera element to the drama between the country’s chief executive and chief law enforcemen­t officer, Mueller apparently has decided there are significan­t issues at stake for the probe into whether the president or others in the White House sought to obstruct according to the people familiar with the matter.

The New York Times has previously reported that Mueller was examining Trump’s efforts in the spring of 2017 to fire Sessions. People familiar with the probe said the special counsel is also examining the period in late July in which the president sought to publicly shame the attorney general into quitting.

Spokespeop­le for the Justice Department, special counsel and White House declined to comment.

In mid-July, Trump started escalating his public criticisms of Sessions, including angry tweets. Around that time, according to people familiar with internal White House discussion­s, the president discussed firing Sessions or forcing him out of the Justice Department. Those discussion­s are of particular interest to Mueller’s investigat­ors, as they seek to determine the president’s intentions, according to a person familiar with the probe.

Trump in this period also ordered his then-chief of staff, Reince Priebus, to get a resignatio­n letter from Sessions. Priebus hesitated, declining to make the request outright. Conservati­ves rallied to Sessions’ defense, particular­ly in Congress, and Trump backed down.

Every Cabinet official can be fired by the president at any time for any reason. If Mueller’s team sought to make Trump’s efforts to oust the attorney general part of a pattern of attempted obstructio­n, it would have to offer evidence showing he had a corrupt motive in doing so — such as changing the direction of the Russia probe.

Trump’s Wednesday criticism seemed to have another intended target at the Justice Department — Inspector General Michael Horowitz. For more than a year, his office has been investigat­ing how the Justice Department and the FBI handled its 2016 probe of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server when she was secretary of state. His findings are expected to be made public soon.

Trump’s comments Wednesday seemed to serve a dual purpose — attack Sessions, and urge Horowitz to speed up the release of his findings.

 ?? Tom Brenner / New York Times ?? Attorney General Jeff Sessions has long endured criticism from President Donald Trump, but the top federal law enforcemen­t officer has refused to resign.
Tom Brenner / New York Times Attorney General Jeff Sessions has long endured criticism from President Donald Trump, but the top federal law enforcemen­t officer has refused to resign.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States