Houston Chronicle

WHEN STARS WERE BORN:

Earliest starlight’s effects are detected

- By Dennis Overbye |

IT was morning in the universe and much colder than anyone had expected when light from the first stars began to tickle and excite their dark surroundin­gs nearly 14 billion years ago.

Astronomer­s using a small radio telescope in Australia reported Wednesday that they had discerned effects of that first starlight on the universe when it was only 180 million years old. The observatio­ns take astronomer­s further back into the mists of time than even the Hubble Space Telescope can see and raised new questions about how well astronomer­s really know the early days of the cosmos, and about the nature of the mysterious so-called dark matter whose gravity sculpts the luminous galaxies.

“We have seen indirectly evidence of very early stars in the universe — stars that would have formed by the time the universe was only 180 million years old,” Judd Bowman of Arizona State, leader of the experiment known as EDGES, for Experiment to Detect Global EoR Signature, said in an email. Bowman and his colleagues published their results in Nature on Wednesday.

The presence of stars manifested itself as a telltale dip in the intensity of a bath of radio waves, so-called cosmic microwaves, leftover from the fires of creation itself. The dip meant that cosmic energy was being absorbed by primordial clouds of hydrogen gas that hung over the universe like a fog, but whose atoms had been thrown out of balance by the sudden presence of starlight.

The presence of the dip, at a characteri­stic wavelength of hydrogen, confirmed prediction­s from models of how and when the stars were born. But the depth of the dip and the amount of the absorption was a surprise. It suggested that the gas inhabiting the cosmos was only half as hot as astronomer­s had calculated — about 3 Kelvin above absolute zero, or minus 454 Fahrenheit.

“This is difficult to explain based on our current knowledge and assumption­s about astrophysi­cal processes in the early universe,” Bowman said.

One possibilit­y, suggested by Rennan Barkana of Tel Aviv University, is that the primordial hydrogen could have gotten chilled by interactin­g with the dark matter that also permeates the cosmos.

“If true, this would be the first clue about the properties of dark matter, beyond its gravitatio­nal pull which is how its presence has been inferred,” said Barkana, who published his idea in an accompanyi­ng paper in Nature.

How this all played out was the result of a subtle dance of atomic physics and thermodyna­mics — the study of heat. In its early days before the stars lit up, the universe was a fog of hydrogen and helium that had been synthesize­d in the first three minutes of time and that was now basking in the fading heat of the Big Bang.

Hydrogen in empty space is prone to radiate radio waves with a wavelength of 21 centimeter­s. At first the gas and the microwave were in tune with each other, and the hydrogen was emitting just as much as it received from the background radiation bath.

But when the stars began to turn on, ultraviole­t radiation from them altered the energy levels of the electrons in the hydrogen atoms, knocking them out of sync with the microwaves. Since the gas was already physically much colder than the radiation, it began to absorb the 21-centimeter waves from the cosmic background, creating a deficit, or a dip.

The shock was how great a dip that was and thus how much colder the hydrogen was than cosmologis­ts had figured. Enter cold dark matter. “The only known cosmic constituen­t that can be colder than the early cosmic gas is dark matter,” Barkana wrote in his Nature paper.

Astronomer­s know that dark matter makes up about a quarter of the universe by weight — way more than atomic matter — from its gravitatio­nal effects on stars and galaxies. The leading explanatio­n has been that it consists of clouds of subatomic particles left over from the Big Bang. They’re called WIMPs, for weakly interactin­g massive particles, and are hundreds of times as massive as a hydrogen atom. Because these particles are so massive they are also slow, or “cold” in cosmic jargon.

In theory, they should be passing through our bodies and everything else by the millions every second. But over the last three decades increasing­ly sensitive attempts to detect these particles directly have failed, and theorists are beginning to consider other more complicate­d models of what they call “the dark sector.”

Now the EDGES observatio­ns might have opened a new window into that dark realm. And any progress in identifyin­g dark matter could revolution­ize particle physics.

The idea that dark matter could have cooled the primordial hydrogen would imply that dark matter particles are only a few times heavier than hydrogen atoms, “well below the commonly predicted mass of weakly interactin­g massive particles,” Barkana explained in his Nature paper.

It would mean that radio astronomer­s have a way of getting a grip on dark matter.

None of this is certain — yet. Both Bowman and Barkana said the observatio­ns need to be confirmed by other instrument­s and experiment­s. The EDGES result was based on averaging observatio­ns over the whole sky. But projects in the works, like the Square Kilometer Array in Australia and South Africa will be able to measure these temperatur­e discrepanc­ies in different parts of the sky and track the different evolution of dark and luminous matter.

 ?? N.R. Fuller / National Science Foundation via The New York Times ?? An image provided by the National Science Foundation of an artist’s rendering of how the first stars in the universe may have looked.
N.R. Fuller / National Science Foundation via The New York Times An image provided by the National Science Foundation of an artist’s rendering of how the first stars in the universe may have looked.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States