Houston Chronicle

How bad was the breach? Equifax supplies the numbers

- By Michael E. Kanell

ATLANTA — Equifax this week filed documents with Congress and federal regulators detailing the breadth of the massive data breach the company suffered last year.

While the outlines of the hacking were known, the filing was an attempt to pin down the number of files accessed in various categories.

More than 145 million people may have their personal informatio­n at risk to criminals after the Equifax breach.

According to the Equifax statements filed by the Atlantabas­ed company with the Securities and Exchange Commission and several congressio­nal committees, among the data accessed by the hackers: 146.6 million names. 146.6 million dates of birth. 145.5 million Social Security numbers.

99 million addresses. 20.3 million phone numbers. 17.6 million driver’s license numbers. 1.8 million email addresses. 97,500 Tax IDs. The papers were filed, the company said, in response to government requests for data.

Equifax announced the breach on Sept. 7, going quickly from obscure credit agency to household name — and not in a good way. Over the next several months, the company periodical­ly reported new categories of data that had been accessed. It also bore the brunt of angry congressio­nal questionin­g and talk show ridicule.

CEO Rick Smith retired under pressure. A new CEO was named in March. The company hired a new data security guru away from Home Depot. One of its rising star tech executives was charged with insider trading. Sen. Elizabeth Warren scalded the company in a report. At least, profits were up. In the papers filed this week, the company said the consumer records had been stolen from “a number of database tables with different schemas.”

The company says it worked with Mandiant, a cybersecur­ity firm, to determine which consumers had their personally identifiab­le informatio­n stolen. But in this week’s filings, Equifax says “the additional detail provided does not identify additional consumers affected, and does not require additional consumer notificati­ons.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States