Houston Chronicle

Judge declares Texas violated voting laws; Paxton plans appeal

- By Jeremy Wallace jeremy.wallace@chron.com twitter.com/jeremyswal­lace

Texas is violating national voter registrati­on laws, a federal court has decided in a final ruling that had had been anticipate­d.

In the ruling made public Friday, U.S. District Judge Orlando L. Garcia in San Antonio declared the Department of Public Safety cannot encourage people to renew driver's licenses online then add additional steps to update their voter registrati­ons that are not required of people who go to their offices in person.

The judge said that the National Voter Registrati­on Act, often called Motor Voter, requires equal treatment.

“DPS is legally obligated, as a designated voter registrati­on agency under the NVRA, to permit a simultaneo­us voter registrati­on applicatio­n with every transactio­n,” Garcia wrote in his opinion.

Texas does not allow people who change their driver's license address online to simultaneo­usly change their voter registrati­on address — something people who make the change in person are allowed to do. Online DPS customers are required to file additional forms and mail them to another agency to change the voter registrati­on when moving from one county to the next within Texas.

Garcia's final ruling had been anticipate­d.

Last month when Garcia first announced he would rule in favor of the Texas Civil Rights Project, state Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office said they were looking “forward to filing an appeal.”

A spokespers­on for the agency said Friday that officials were still reviewing the ruling.

In late March, Garcia indicated in a court order that he would side with the Texas Civil Rights Project, which brought the case.

The group argued that many people who checked a box online thought they were getting their voter registrati­ons updated as well, but that never happened. Many did not realize it required additional forms and actions to make the change happen.

“Today is a victory for voting rights and democracy in Texas,” said Mimi Marziani, president of the Texas Civil Rights Project.

“For years, the state of Texas ignored and violated federal laws designed to bring more people onto the voter registrati­on rolls and strengthen our democracy,” she said.

The state had argued that Texas voting laws require a signature on paper to change a voter registrati­on. But Garcia said testimony in the case shows that for even in-person changes of address, DPS uses electronic signatures that are transmitte­d to the Secretary of State's office to update voter records, so it makes little sense why electronic signatures online could not also be used.

“Yet SOS admits that it uses previously stored electronic signatures for all voter registrati­on applicatio­ns that originate with DPS regardless of whether those applicatio­ns are paper transactio­ns,” Garcia noted in his ruling.

He has given the state until May 17 to come up with a plan to allow updates to driver’s licenses and voter registrati­on informatio­n for both online and in-person without additional steps for one over the other.

The Texas Civil Rights Project used the case of a Harris County man as one of their examples of voters who tried to update their driver’s licenses online and thought they would also have their voter registrati­ons updated. In 2015, John Woods moved from Travis County to Harris County.

When he changed his driver's license address online, Woods thought his voter registrati­on data was also updated. But when he showed up to vote in 2015, Woods was told he was not registered in the county. Woods is hardly alone. Between September 2013 and May 26, 2015, more than 1,800 voters filed formal complaints with the state saying they mistakenly believed their voter registrati­on records were updated when they used the DPS online system.

The Texas Civil Rights Project said that’s a mere fraction of voters who have been duped by the state's confusing system.

 ?? Eric Gay / Associated Press file ?? A federal judge ruled on Friday that Texas violated the equal treatment provision of the National Voter Registrati­on Act.
Eric Gay / Associated Press file A federal judge ruled on Friday that Texas violated the equal treatment provision of the National Voter Registrati­on Act.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States