Houston Chronicle

Life in prison

Don’t spend taxpayer dollars to execute a severely mentally ill blind man.

-

One of the oldest concepts of punishment can be found in the Bible — an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.

Andre Thomas loved memorizing Bible verses when he was in Sunday school at Harmony Baptist Church, according to a Texas Monthly profile. But after he was arrested for murder, Thomas took the concept further — gouging out his own right eye while awaiting trial. After a jury sentenced him to death, Thomas pulled out his remaining eye and ate it.

Despite a long history of severe mental illness that includes those and other episodes of selfmutila­tion, Texas continues to seek to execute Thomas. It is another instance of the death penalty run amok — a cruel and increasing­ly unusual practice that should be put to an end.

On June 5, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit will hear oral argument in the case of Thomas, who suffers from “schizophre­nia characteri­zed by psychotic delusions and hyperrelig­ious preoccupat­ions.” His lawyers claim he was “actively psychotic” at the time he murdered and mutilated his ex-wife, his own son and his former wife’s daughter by another man, according to his attorneys and medical experts.

Incredibly, Thomas’ two original defense attorneys never introduced evidence in his trial about Thomas’ long history of mental illness, suicide attempts and visits to doctors seeking help immediatel­y before the crime.

His appellate attorneys subsequent­ly have raised important questions both about his competence, and about whether members of the all-white jury that sentenced him to die were biased against him on racial grounds. Thomas is African-American. His former wife was white and both children were biracial. Yet four jurors allowed to serve in his case expressed opposition to interracia­l marriage. One said it wasn’t what God intended. Another said, “We should stay with our bloodline.”

At this point, Thomas is not even seeking relief — he’s just asking for a “Certificat­e of Appealabil­ity,” a step required before the court would actually consider his case and whether to offer relief. The state is opposing that effort.

Texas should drop its appeal and agree that Thomas’ sentence should be commuted to life. He should be allowed to spend the rest of his days in a jail cell where the demons of his mental illness and the pangs of his own conscience will alternatel­y torment him.

The rest of us should contemplat­e what another Bible verse says about taking an eye for an eye — Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States