Houston Chronicle

Warden demoted as TDCJ reviews policy

Move comes after officials dismissed hundreds of cases

- By Keri Blakinger

A Texas prison warden was demoted and transferre­d this month even as officials announced plans to boost officer training, review disciplina­ry policies and explicitly ban the sort of quota system that sparked a statewide audit.

The move comes weeks after Texas Department of Criminal Justice officials tossed more than 500 disciplina­ry cases and demoted several ranking officials amid an investigat­ion that revealed quotas in four of the state’s facilities, where officers were ordered to write up inmates or in some cases face disciplina­ry action themselves.

“I’m glad to see something good is coming from what I believe was a reprehensi­ble action,” said state Sen. John Whitmire, D-Houston. “Not only in this process do the inmates have to be held accountabl­e but also the correction­s officers.”

At the same time, the prison system is also grappling with the fallout from allegation­s that officers planted evidence in an inmate’s cell, a charge that sparked a separate investigat­ion and resulted in the firing of four officers and the resignatio­n of a fifth — all at the Ramsey Unit, the same Brazoria County lockup where the quo-

ta system first came to light.

Now, Warden Virgil McMullen — who oversaw the facility in Rosharon — has been demoted and moved to the Johnston Unit, more than 200 miles away in northeast Texas. He’s already been replaced, but prison officials didn’t immediatel­y clarify who the unit’s new warden is.

Records tossed

Texas prisons are also moving ahead with efforts to reform the disciplina­ry system and prevent similar incidents in the future.

“The agency is reviewing all disciplina­ry training and considerin­g new statewide training for all those involved in the disciplina­ry process,” said TDCJ spokesman Jeremy Desel. “The agency is also working to make changes to policy to include explicit language that forbids any type of quota system or mandated case writing activity.

“This will make it crystal clear to all that nothing even resembling mandated disciplina­ry activity will be tolerated.”

The problems emerged earlier this year when the Chronicle obtained leaked copies of an email written by Capt. Reginald Gilbert, who ordered officers to write up prisoners or face disciplina­ry consequenc­es themselves.

“Effective March 10, 2018, each Sergeant will be required to turn in at least two (2) cases written by officers for a Level 2 Code 35 ‘Unauthoriz­ed Storage of Property,’” he wrote. “Two each day is my requiremen­t. Remember this is to be done each workday without exception.”

A couple hours later, then-Major Juan Jackson responded, noting that the “below instructio­ns will help greatly in fighting a gig,” which is slang for an audit. The quota system was abandoned in a matter of weeks, as announced in an email Gilbert sent at McMullen’s behest.

After receiving an anonymous copy of the messages, the Chronicle put in a records request on April 21. Four days later, McMullen fired off an email to ranking officials at the unit.

“This email is to reiterate the email I had Capt. Gilbert send out on April 6, 2018. We DO NOT and WILL NOT have case quotas on Ramsey Unit,” he wrote. “Make sure any and all previous emails regarding case quotas are not being followed. We will follow agency policy.”

After the Chronicle’s report, the quota system sparked a statewide audit, which found similar short-lived systems in place at three other units: Lychner State Jail in Harris County, Travis County State Jail in Austin and the McConnell Unit in Bee County.

As a result, more than 500 inmate disciplina­ry cases were tossed out, and a number of ranking officers demoted.

After hearing of the quota system, an inmate’s mother wrote to the Office of the Inspector General, claiming her son had been set up by prison guards at the facility in Rosharon. OIG probed the allegation and found it credible, though Desel described it as an “isolated incident.”

The officers involved could still face criminal charges, officials said.

‘Very encouragin­g’

Even as authoritie­s continue probing the evidence-planting allegation­s, prison officials are taking a closer look at the inmate disciplina­ry process. Aside from increasing training and looking again at department policies, TDCJ leadership is also examining the system for defending inmates accused of disciplina­ry infraction­s.

“In the current system there are individual­s who operate as counsel substitute­s, essentiall­y counsel for the offenders accused in disciplina­ry cases,” Desel said. “They formerly reported to unit wardens. Now those individual­s will receive enhanced training and report to the Division of Administra­tive Review and Risk Management, which will increase the independen­ce of these positions and allow them to potentiall­y see any unusual trends.”

For advocates, the possible changes bode well moving forward.

“It’s very encouragin­g,” said Jennifer Erschabek of the Texas Inmate Families Associatio­n.

Doug Smith, a policy analyst with the Texas Criminal Justice Coalition, hoped the changes could improve prison safety.

“When you do mass punishment like that, you put people in danger because it invites retaliatio­n,” he said. “I’m thrilled that this reporting has uncovered some dangerous and ineffectiv­e policies, and I’m thrilled that people are going to be treated justly and fairly because that’s how you foster rehabilita­tion.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States