Houston Chronicle

Disarm N. Korea in a year? Promises don’t match reality

- By David E. Sanger and William J. Broad

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s national security adviser said Sunday that North Korea could dismantle all its nuclear weapons, threatenin­g missiles and biological weapons “in a year,” a far more aggressive schedule than the one Secretary of State Mike Pompeo outlined for Congress recently, reflecting a strain inside the administra­tion over how to match promises with realism.

The statements by John Bolton, the national security adviser and historical­ly a deep skeptic that North Korea will ever fully disarm, came as Pompeo prepares to make his third trip to North Korea late this week.

Pompeo will arrive in Pyongyang with a proposed schedule for disarmamen­t that would begin with a declaratio­n by North Korea of all its weapons, production facilities and missiles. The declaratio­n will be the first real test of the North’s candor, amid increasing concern that it may be trying to conceal parts of its nuclear program. But Bolton, appearing on CBS’ “Face the Nation,” said Sunday that, nearly three weeks after the North Korean leader, Kim Jong Un, and Trump met in Singapore, no such declaratio­n has arrived.

Advisers to Pompeo, both outside the government and inside the CIA, which he used to direct, have cautioned him that North Korea will not give up its arsenal of 20 to 60 weapons until the last stages of any disarmamen­t plan — if it gives them up at all. Many of the plans they have given him call for the North to halt production of nuclear fuel — at a moment that there are signs of increased production — but do not insist on dismantlin­g weapons until Kim gains confidence that economic benefits are beginning to flow and that the United States and its allies will not seek to overthrow him.

It is an approach fraught with risk, and runs contrary to what Bolton, before entering the government, and Trump had said the North must do: dismantle everything first, and ship its bombs and fuel out of the country. If the North is permitted to keep its weapons, it would remain a nuclear state for a long while, perhaps years.

The effort to put North Korea on a schedule is particular­ly urgent because there is no evidence the Singapore summit meeting has produced tangible results, despite Trump’s proclamati­on on Twitter that “there is no longer a Nuclear Threat from North Korea.”

Worrisome signs about North Korea’s commitment to disarmamen­t have been accumulati­ng. In Singapore, Trump said the North was destroying a major missile-engine test site, but the known sites are still standing, untouched, according to satellite photograph­s. Work is proceeding on a new nuclear reactor that would dramatical­ly increase the North’s ability to produce plutonium, a potent fuel for an atomic bomb.

And CIA officials are watching to see whether the North reveals in the declaratio­n a covert plant suspected of enriching uranium, the other main fuel for nuclear arms.

 ?? Associated Press ?? John Bolton has historical­ly been a skeptic that North Korea will ever fully disarm.
Associated Press John Bolton has historical­ly been a skeptic that North Korea will ever fully disarm.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States