As its film business grows up, China faces an ‘Ishtar’ moment with its most expensive movie
It was supposed to be China’s “Lord of the Rings.” Instead, it turned into another “Ishtar,” the infamous box office bomb of 1987. Produced for more than $100 million, the fantasy epic “Asura” was billed as the most expensive movie ever produced by China’s burgeoning film industry. It aimed to spawn a trilogy based on Tibetan mythology by following a classic Hollywood playbook: pair a time-tested story with sumptuous visual effects, big-name actors and industry veterans.
Then the movie hit theaters last weekend with a thud, grossing just $7 million. In a stunning retreat, the producers quickly yanked the mega-flop from theaters, offering no explanation.
“We apologize to the audience who never got to watch the movie and the inconvenience it caused,” they said on Chinese social media site Weibo.
“Asura” became the talk of the Chinese film industry after it disappeared from theaters. It was a humbling moment for an industry that is enjoying a record year at the box office and is poised to surpass the U.S. and Canada as the biggest theatrical market by 2020.
The failure of “Asura” is emblematic of a new reality confronting filmmakers in China. As the Middle Kingdom emulates U.S. studios with increasing budgets and franchise ambitions, audiences are becoming more discerning about what they want to see on the big screen.
The failure of “Asura” “to launch is the final nail in the coffin for the erroneous belief that Chinese audiences will accept scale and visual effects over fundamental storytelling,” said Peter Shiao, chief executive of film production and marketing company Orb Media in Los Angeles and Beijing.
Box office disasters are nothing new in Hollywood, of course. U.S. film companies have been hammered by such overpriced and misguided efforts as the 1995 dud “Cutthroat Island” and Walt Disney’s “The Lone Ranger” in 2013.
China has weathered its share of box office flops. In 2010, China had a big miss with “Confucius,” a bloated biopic about the famous Chinese sage starring Chow YunFat. Officials tried everything to get people to see it, including giving away tickets and pulling the popular “Avatar” from screens. Nothing worked.
But the failure of “Asura” has prompted more hand wringing. Some believe local investors will take a more cautious approach to funding big-budget spectacles.
“In the past, it’s been pretty easy for Chinese investors to raise money for movies like this,” said Scott Einbinder, whose company Cristal Pictures is backed by Hong Kong’s East Light Media. “That’s going to change.”
Others see “Asura” as a natural side effect of rapid growth in China.
“Chinese audiences are growing more and more sophisticated,” said Lindsay Conner, a China expert with the Los Angeles law firm Manatt, Phelps & Phillips. “The Chinese film industry can support higher and higher budgets for its films. But the risks and rewards are both greater than ever.”
Although U.S. studios view China as a crucial foreign market, co-productions have fallen flat, as with 2016 Matt Damon fantasy “The Great Wall,” a $150-million production from Legendary East and Universal Pictures. Though American franchises such as the “The Fast & the Furious” and “Avengers” do well in China, others, such as “Star Wars,” struggle to make the crossover.
Beijing limits the number of
movies allowed into the country from the U.S. and other nations as part of a revenue-sharing agreement. American studios have sought to increase the 34-film-ayear quota and the share of the box office grosses they collect from Chinese theaters (they get 25 percent of ticketing revenue, versus roughly 40 percent elsewhere). But the growing trade war between the U.S. and China has derailed those talks.
Nonetheless, China’s film industry continues to grow. Ticket sales are on track to surpass $9 billion this year, largely driven by Chinese productions. Receipts have totaled more than $5 billion so far this year, up 20 percent from the same period in 2017, according to data firm Artisan Gateway.
Indeed, the failure of “Asura” stands in contrast to local productions that have drawn Chinese moviegoers to cineplexes in droves.
Four of the five highest-grossing movies released in China this year are domestic productions. The top movie, the nationalistic “Operation Red Sea,” collected $518 million. Last year, the patriotic action movie “Wolf Warrior 2” grossed more than $800 million.
More unexpected was the breakout success this month of the dark, low-budget comedy “Dying to Survive.” The movie, about the owner of a small drug store who smuggles generic medication from India to sell to cancer patients in China, became a national sensation. It has grossed $347 million so far, making it the fifth-highestgrossing movie ever in China.
Its popularity is all the more remarkable for tackling a hotbutton issue in China’s highly censored media market. The film has reportedly accelerated government efforts to tamp down the price of cancer drugs.
The success of “Dying to Survive” shows that China’s tastes are changing, analysts said. Although mass-market Hollywood movies such as “Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom” continue to wow with high production values, Chinese audiences expect local productions that are relevant to their lives.
“When there’s a homegrown film, people’s expectation of the storytelling is much higher,” said David U. Lee, founder and chief executive of film producer and marketer Leeding Media. “When you don’t have that, you’re in no man’s land.”
The failure of “Asura,” produced by Zhenjian Film Studio and Ningxia Film Group with financing from Jack Ma’s Alibaba Pictures, left film executives looking for answers.
“Asura” starred young heartthrob Lei Wu and employed a roster of Hollywood industry veterans, marking the directorial debut of stunt coordinator Peng Zhang (“The Twilight Saga”). It summoned Oscar-winning costume designer Ngila Dickson (“Lord of the Rings”) and visual effects supervisor Charlie Iturriaga (“Deadpool”).
But that pedigree couldn’t make up for a concept that failed to interest moviegoers, analysts said. Loosely based on Buddhist mythology, “Asura” is the story of a young man who must help save a mythical realm from a coup.
The producers alleged “Asura” fell victim to online trolls, known as water armies because they flood review sites to skew ratings.
The ratings are influential because they reside on online ticketing platforms, which is where 90 percent of movie tickets are sold in China. Users on Maoyan, backed by Alibaba’s rival, Tencent, rated the film a dismal 4.9 out of 10. The Alibaba-owned Tiao Piao Piao, however, gave “Asura” a score of 8.4.
“Asura’s” producers, in a Weibo post, called the disparity “the shame of the industry.”
Experts doubted the troll theory. They noted that user reviews on the Chinese website Douban, known to be a more neutral haven for snarky cinephiles, balked at the overuse of digital graphics. Some called it a “Game of Thrones” knockoff.
The decision to promote “Asura” as China’s most expensive production probably backfired. Citing the price tag, some commenters said it was another example of one of China’s biggest contemporary problems: too much money and nowhere good to invest it. “Typical money laundering movie,” one moviegoer wrote.
Ying Zhu, a professor at City University of New York who focuses on the Chinese entertainment industry, said the film didn’t connect with the current cultural climate.
“Suffice to say that utilizing an occidental sci-fi vehicle to carry a mythical Buddhist tale is a miscalculation,” Zhu said. “The (marriage of ) a manufactured ancient Chinese tale and a futuristic Hollywood blockbuster clearly does not sit well with fans of ‘Game of Thrones’ in China.”
China’s heavily digital society makes the film business less forgiving. Filmgoers are voracious social media users, so when a movie gets a bad response, the audience reacts very quickly. That probably made a bad situation worse for “Asura.”
Additionally, because Chinese theaters show movies digitally, cinema managers can easily remove underperforming movies from their screens and replace them with a better product.
But adding to the mystery surrounding “Asura,” it appears it was the producers, not the theater owners, who pulled the movie out of circulation. Reports suggested that the producers wanted to retool the film for a re-release.
“It doesn’t make any sense,” said Lee, of Leeding Media. “Once the movie is released, the cat’s out of the bag.”