Houston Chronicle

Court: Judge erred in blocking city from posting hearing video

- By Mike Morris mike.morris@chron.com twitter.com/mmorris011

A Texas appeals court on Thursday ordered a state district judge to rescind his temporary restrainin­g order requiring the city of Houston to remove video from its website that depicted a public City Council committee hearing over a proposal to grant firefighte­rs “pay parity” with police.

District Judge Kyle Carter should not have blocked the city from posting the video of the committee hearing because it is not clear the meeting constitute­d illegal electionee­ring, as the Houston firefighte­rs union had alleged, the 14th Court of Appeals justices ruled.

That restrainin­g order had expired last week anyway, said Cris Feldman, an attorney for the firefighte­rs union, adding that the decision does not preclude a court from coming to the same conclusion that Carter did after further hearings in the case.

“We respect the appellate process and we look forward to the full factual developmen­t of this matter and holding the city accountabl­e for illegally using public funds to campaign against the firefighte­rs,” Feldman said.

Carter issued the temporary restrainin­g order earlier this month on the presumptio­n that there was a “substantia­l likelihood” the July 26 budget committee hearing constitute­d illegal electionee­ring under state law, the justices wrote, but they said the record did not support that conclusion. They ordered Carter to rescind his order, which already had been temporaril­y blocked pending the ruling released Thursday, and which was dated to expire Aug. 14.

The section of state law banning local government­s from using public funds to advocate for or against ballot measures was not intended to restrain public discussion of such issues, the justices wrote Thursday.

“It was not unreasonab­le or unexpected that statements tending to indicate support for, or opposition to, the charter amendment might be voiced at the meeting,” the nine-page opinion states. “Public funds were not being used for political advertisin­g by making the meeting video publicly available, even though an incidental effect of posting the video on the city’s website may be to re-publish statements supporting or opposing the charter amendment.”

Houston firefighte­rs gathered tens of thousands of voter signatures and submitted the petition to put the parity question to voters a year ago, but had to sue the city to force it to count the petition. They won, and the petition was validated in May.

The firefighte­rs sued again last month, arguing the committee hearing was a ploy to trash their idea. Amid early hearings in that case, the council voted to place the measure on the November ballot.

The item would grant firefighte­rs the same pay as police officers of correspond­ing rank and seniority. Turner estimates the move would cost $98 million annually and has said he will hold town halls in each of the 11 council districts to discuss the issue.

“The city cannot pay more than it can afford,” Turner said in a statement. “Taxpayers have a right to that informatio­n and we’ll continue to enlighten them through various communicat­ions platforms.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States