Houston Chronicle

CIA’s sources in Kremlin go incommunic­ado

Vital informants quiet, leaving U.S. in dark on Putin’s midterm plans

- By Julian E. Barnes and Matthew Rosenberg

WASHINGTON — In 2016, U.S. intelligen­ce agencies delivered urgent and explicit warnings about Russia’s intentions to try to tip the U.S. presidenti­al election — and a detailed assessment of the operation afterward — thanks in large part to informants close to President Vladimir Putin and in the Kremlin who provided crucial details.

But two years later, the vital Kremlin informants have largely gone silent, leaving the CIA and other spy agencies in the dark about precisely what Putin’s intentions are for November’s midterm elections, according to U.S. officials familiar with the intelligen­ce.

The officials do not believe the sources have been compromise­d or killed. Instead, they have concluded they have gone to ground amid more aggressive counterint­elligence by Moscow, including efforts to kill spies, like the poisoning in March in Britain of a former Russian intelligen­ce officer that utilized a rare Russian-made nerve agent.

Current and former officials also said the expulsion of U.S. intelligen­ce officers from Moscow has hurt collection efforts. And officials also raised the possibilit­y that the outing of an FBI informant under scrutiny by the House intelligen­ce committee — an examinatio­n encouraged by President Donald Trump — has had a chilling effect on intelligen­ce collection.

Senior intelligen­ce officials, including Dan Coats, director of national intelligen­ce, have warned that Russians are intent on subverting U.S. democratic institutio­ns.

But U.S. intelligen­ce agencies have not been able to say precisely what are Putin’s intentions: He could be trying to tilt the midterm elections, simply sow chaos or generally undermine trust in the democratic process.

The officials, seeking to protect methods of collection from Russia, would not provide details about lost sources, but acknowledg­ed the degradatio­n in the informatio­n collected from Russia. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to reveal classified informatio­n. A spokesman for the CIA declined to comment.

The United States continues to intercept Russian communicat­ion, and the flow of that intelligen­ce remains strong, said current and former officials. And Russian informants could still meet their CIA handlers outside Russia, farther from Moscow’s counterint­elligence apparatus.

But people inside or close to the Kremlin remain critical to divining whether there is a strategy behind the efforts to undermine U.S. institutio­ns.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States