Houston Chronicle

Texas’ fetal burial law struck down

Ruling a blow to those opposed to abortion, is likely to be appealed

- By Andrea Zelinski

AUSTIN — A federal judge on Wednesday struck down a Texas law requiring fetal and embryonic tissue from failed and aborted pregnancie­s to be buried or cremated, striking a blow to antiaborti­on activists and delivering another defeat to the Texas Attorney General’s Office, which defended the law in court.

It is the third Texas law restrictin­g abortion to be overturned by the courts in recent years, but the state’s lawyers are expected to quickly appeal Wednesday’s decision by U.S. District Judge David Ezra. That would send the case to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, considered one of the most conservati­ve federal appellate courts in the nation.

Texas lawmakers approved the fetal burial law in 2017, testing out a new anti-abortion strategy focusing on the fetus. The law would require hospitals and abortion clinics to arrange for fetal and embryonic remains to be buried or cremated, regardless of the woman’s wishes or religious beliefs. The law does not apply to at-home abortions but does apply to the remains from miscarriag­es and ectopic pregnancie­s.

Opponents argue the forced in-

terment is another example of government officials enacting laws to shame women and create more hurdles for them to get abortions.

The law created “substantia­l obstacles” for women, doctors and abortion clinics while offering “absolutely no health benefit in return,” Ezra explained from the bench.

“There are far, far more women who miscarry in the state of Texas every year than there are women who seek an elected abortion, and those women would be dramatical­ly impacted in a significan­t … way by this legislatio­n,” Ezra said.

The judge offered a glimmer of hope to the supporters of the fetal burial law, saying the state has a legitimate interest in protecting the dignity of life. However, in issuing a permanent injunction on the law, Ezra concluded that its speedy implementa­tion and the lack of resources to facilitate the burials and cremations created an undue burden on women and health care providers.

“What we do know is that these laws get introduced and passed under the sham of protecting women, when in reality it’s a political agenda,” said Andrea Ferrigno, a vice president of Whole Woman’s Health, one of the plaintiffs in the case.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican up for reelection, called the ruling disappoint­ing and vowed to appeal the case.

“I remain confident the courts will ultimately uphold the Texas law, which honors the dignity of the unborn and prevents fetal reweight mains from being treated as medical waste,” Paxton said in a statement. “My office will continue to fight to uphold the law, which requires the dignified treatment of fetal remains, rather than allow health care facilities to dispose of the remains in sewers or landfills.”

Paxton’s office has spent half a million taxpayer dollars putting pro-life advocates on the stand as expert witnesses to defend Texas’ abortion restrictio­ns, a Houston Chronicle and San Antonio Express-News analysis found. Judges often dismissed or gave little to no on the state’s experts, according to court rulings and transcript­s.

The overturnin­g of the fetal burial law comes on the heels of a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that struck down a pair of Texas regulation­s that forced the closure of several abortion clinics in Texas. Anti-abortion advocates are hopeful the pending appointmen­t of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the high court will solidify a conservati­ve Supreme Court that could undercut abortion rights.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States