Houston Chronicle

Rancor grows over FBI inquiry

Finished report on Kavanaugh heads to Senate amid criticism

- By Seung Min Kim, John Wagner and Josh Dawsey WASHINGTON POST

WASHINGTON — The White House prepared late Wednesday to send the FBI’s completed report on Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh to the Senate, as partisan rancor continued to grow over the scope of the investigat­ion into sexual assault allegation­s that have endangered his confirmati­on.

The latest FBI probe updating Kavanaugh’s background check was set to arrive Wednesday night on Capitol Hill, according to two people familiar with its release. White House officials have been briefed on the

“More baseless innuendo and more false smears from Senate Democrats.” Senate Judiciary Committee Republican­s in a statement

FBI’s findings, the people said.

The developmen­ts came as Senate Democrats opened a new front in their objections to the investigat­ions of Kavanaugh’s conduct, suggesting in a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, that past FBI background checks of Kavanaugh include evidence of inappropri­ate behavior, without disclosing specifics.

The letter, signed by eight of the 10 Democrats on the Judiciary Committee, challenged the accuracy of a tweet from the committee’s Republican staff on Tuesday that said: “Nowhere in any of these six FBI reports, which the committee has reviewed on a bipartisan basis, was there ever a whiff of ANY issue — at all — related in any way to inappropri­ate sexual behavior or alco-

hol abuse.”

The Democrats said the informatio­n in the tweet is “not accurate,” urging the GOP to correct it.

“It is troubling that the committee majority has characteri­zed informatio­n from Judge Kavanaugh’s confidenti­al background investigat­ion on Twitter, as that informatio­n is confidenti­al and not subject to public release,” the Democrats, led by Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., wrote to Grassley.

“If the committee majority is going to violate that confidenti­ality and characteri­ze this background investigat­ion publicly, you must at least be honest about it.”

The two committee Democrats who did not sign the letter were Sens. Christophe­r Coons of Delaware and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota.

Grassley’s staff responded on Twitter that “nothing in the tweet is inaccurate or misleading.”

“The committee stands by its statement, which is completely truthful,” the committee Republican­s said. “More baseless innuendo and more false smears from Senate Democrats.”

Friday procedural vote

The FBI report is set to arrive in the Senate the same day Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is expected to tee up a key procedural vote advancing Kavanaugh’s nomination for Friday. Until that vote, senators will be rushing in and out of a secure facility at the Capitol to review the sensitive FBI report that the bureau has compiled, looking into allegation­s of sexual misconduct against Kavanaugh.

Two Senate officials say the report will be available at a sensitive compartmen­ted informatio­n facility, or SCIF, in the Capitol Visitor Center, a secure room designed for senators to review sensitive or classified material. Just one physical copy of the report will be available and only to senators and a small group of cleared committee staffers.

The two parties will take turns having access to the FBI report in shifts, according to a senior Senate official. For example, Republican­s will spend an hour with the report from 8 a.m. until 9 a.m. Thursday, then Democrats will have an hour with the report. It will rotate throughout the rest of the day Thursday and potentiall­y into Friday, with senators being briefed by staff members simultaneo­usly. Earlier Wednesday, a trio of Republican senators crucial to Kavanaugh’s confirmati­on prospects criticized President Trump for mocking the account of a woman who has accused his Supreme Court nominee of sexual assault decades ago.

In separate interviews, Sens. Jeff Flake of Arizona, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska — considered swing votes on Kavanaugh — took issue with comments the president made the night before at a political rally in Mississipp­i that drew laughs from his supporters.

“There’s no time and no place for remarks like that,” Flake said on NBC’s “Today” show. “To discuss something this sensitive at a political rally is just not right. It’s just not right. I wish he hadn’t done it. It’s kind of appalling.”

Flake, the Judiciary Committee member who pushed to delay the vote on Kavanaugh so the FBI could investigat­e, later told the Washington Post that Trump’s comments would not factor into his thinking on the nomination.

“You can’t take it out on other people, the president’s insensitiv­e remarks,” he said.

The impact on Collins and Murkowski was less clear.

About two hours after Flake’s appearance, Collins also took exception to Trump’s remarks, telling reporters, “The president’s comments were just plain wrong.” She did not answer a question about whether the comments could affect how she votes on Kavanaugh.

Speaking to reporters early Wednesday afternoon, Murkowski said: “I thought the president’s comments yesterday mocking Dr. Ford were wholly inappropri­ate and, in my view, unacceptab­le.”

Asked whether the comments would affect her vote, she said: “I am taking everything into account.”

Trump attacks Ford

In his most direct attack on Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault while both were teenagers in Maryland, Trump sought Tuesday night to highlight holes in the account Ford gave in sworn testimony to the Judiciary Committee last week.

Ford has said that the incident happened in an upstairs room at a gathering of teenagers and that she is “100 percent” certain it was Kavanaugh who assaulted her, although she has acknowledg­ed that her memories of other details of the evening remain unclear.

Trump’s comments at Tuesday’s rally prompted a debate that played out on cable television and elsewhere over whether he had hurt his nominee’s chances.

Among those who weighed in was Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who said that everything Trump had said was factual but that he took issue with his tone.

“I would tell him, ‘Knock it off, you’re not helping,’ ” Graham said.

“This is what you get when you go through a trailer park with a $100 bill,” Graham added, paraphrasi­ng an infamous line used by James Carville, a former campaign strategist for President Bill Clinton, to refer to a Clinton accuser.

Besides Flake, Collins and Murkowski, Democratic Sens. Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota and Joe Manchin of West Virginia also have yet to announce how they will vote.

While trying to round up votes on his side, McConnell has also taken sharp aim at Democrats, accusing them of trying to “move the goal posts” on Kavanaugh’s confirmati­on fight by suggesting that Friday would be too soon for a key vote on him.

“If my friends across the aisle had their way, the goal posts on Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination would be in another time zone,” he said.

Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., fired back in remarks after McConnell, saying the weeklong delay to let the FBI investigat­e came at the request of Republican senators who were not prepared to vote for Kavanaugh’s nomination.

“Man up and say it’s your decision, not ours,” Schumer said.

White House counselor Kellyanne Conway defended her boss during a Wednesday morning television appearance.

“The president is pointing out factual inconsiste­ncies by Ford’s own testimony,” Conway said on Fox News. “There are gaps in her memory. There are facts she cannot remember.”

At a White House briefing later in the day, press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders echoed those statements and asserted a double standard when it comes to questionin­g the testimony of Ford and questionin­g the testimony of Kavanaugh.

“It wasn’t anything but the president stating facts,” Sanders said of Trump.

She declined to say whether Trump still believes Ford was credible.

Besides Ford, two other women have publicly accused Kavanaugh of misconduct while he was in high school or college. Deborah Ramirez, who has accused Kavanaugh of exposing himself to her while they were students at Yale University, has been interviewe­d by the FBI.

A third accuser, Julie Swetnick, said in an affidavit that Kavanaugh was present at a house party in 1982 where she was the victim of a gang rape.

Kavanaugh has vehemently denied all allegation­s of misconduct.

Judge’s temperamen­t

Some Democrats have voiced concerns about the scope of the FBI probe, the extent to which the White House is limiting it and whether a week is long enough to conduct a thorough investigat­ion.

As a vote nears, Democrats have also sought to highlight concerns about Kavanaugh’s temperamen­t, pointing to moments in last week’s hearing in which he grew testy at senators and was emotional at other points.

During his television appearance, Flake reiterated that he, too, was concerned that Kavanaugh at times was “sharp and more partisan than a lot of us would like to see.”

But he said Kavanaugh’s tenure as a federal appeals court judge was also relevant.

“We’ve seen a record that he’s had on the court of collegiali­ty and working with other members,” Flake said.

During his remarks, McConnell said it was completely understand­able that Kavanaugh had grown “a little testy” at the hearing.

“I would ask any of my colleagues, how would you feel if your reputation had been destroyed in this mudslide?” he said.

 ?? Al Drago / New York Times ?? President Donald Trump’s comments in Mississipp­i about Christine Blasey Ford and her accusation­s against Brett Kavanaugh drew criticism from three key Republican senators.
Al Drago / New York Times President Donald Trump’s comments in Mississipp­i about Christine Blasey Ford and her accusation­s against Brett Kavanaugh drew criticism from three key Republican senators.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States