Dioceses urged not to destroy documents
Feds’ letter a sign Catholic Church probe may widen
The Justice Department has sent a sweeping request to every Catholic diocese in the U.S. not to destroy documents related to the handling of child sexual abuse, a sign that a federal investigation into the church could grow far more extensive.
Catholic bishops have been asked by the government to retain their files on a broad array of internal matters, including sexual abuse investigations, and the transfer of priests across state or international borders or to treatment centers. The request includes documents contained in “secret archives” — the confidential files kept by each diocese.
News reports last week revealed that the Justice Department had opened an investigation into all eight Catholic dioceses in Pennsylvania, and the diocese of Buffalo in New York. This marked the first time the government had undertaken an investigation of the church’s handling of abusive priests, a scandal that surfaced in the U.S. in the mid-1980s.
But this request to preserve files, first disclosed by Whispers in the Loggia, a site that follows the Catholic hierarchy, suggests that federal investigators are throwing a wide net. The abuse scandal, long fueled by the shocking details in the church’s own personnel documents, may now grow like an uncontrolled wildfire.
“Every diocese should assume that it is potentially under investigation,” said Marci Hamilton, a law professor and founder of CHILD USA, a think tank at the University of Pennsylvania that studies child sexual abuse and prevention. “Given the crisscrossing paths of priests sent from one diocese to another across the United States, I can understand why someone in Washington would say, ‘OK, everybody needs to hold onto their evidence right now because we’re just starting to sketch out where the pedophiles have been sent by the hierarchy.’”
Abuse victims have despaired for years that the church in the U.S. would never be called to fully account for the perpetrators and the people they violated. There have been government-run inquiries in countries such as Australia and Ireland, but the U.S. government has been reluctant to intervene, until now. The letter from the U.S. attorney suggested only the potential of a broader investigation, but abuse victims greeted it as a turning point nevertheless.
“It’s going to bring tears to my eyes just thinking about it,” said Tim Lennon, president of the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests. “It’s hopefully the beginning of a process of long-awaited justice. For survivors, it’s been a long road to bring those who have harmed children and the vulnerable to justice.”
The request to the bishops was contained in a letter and set of instructions from U.S. Attorney William McSwain, of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and sent to the president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, Cardinal Daniel DiNardo of the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston. The letter, dated Oct. 9, asked that DiNardo “immediately transmit copies” to all dioceses in the U.S. The bishops conference then sent it to the dioceses Tuesday.
McSwain said in his letter that at this point there was “no need” for the bishops to produce any documents “solely on account of this letter.” He said the letter was only a request that the church entities “not destroy, discard, dispose of, delete or alter any of the described documents.” But he started his letter by saying that his office was “investigating possible violations of federal law.”
The general counsel of the bishops conference, Anthony Picarello Jr., warned in a cover letter to the bishops that the request was “very broad.” Picarello wrote that the conference had taken steps to preserve its documents, and he advised the dioceses to do the same. But he said he had told the U.S. attorney that the conference “lacks the authority” to make sure that the dioceses retain their documents.
In a statement Friday, Picarello said, “We have transmitted the U.S. attorney’s letter at his request and in the spirit of cooperation with law enforcement.” His office said he was unavailable for a telephone interview.