Houston Chronicle

Microsoft agrees to sell advance technologi­es to the military and intelligen­ce agencies.

Company will have a role in how the U.S. counters China

- By David E. Sanger

REDMOND, Wash. — Microsoft said Friday that it would sell the military and intelligen­ce agencies whatever advanced technologi­es they needed “to build a strong defense,” just months after Google told the Pentagon it would refuse to provide artificial intelligen­ce products that could build more accurate drones or compete with China for next-generation weapons.

The announceme­nt was made quietly in a small, town hall-style meeting with the software giant’s leadership Thursday with plans for it to be to published on a blog Friday afternoon. It underscore­s the radically different paths these leading U.S. technology firms are taking as they struggle with their role in creating a new generation of cyber weapons to help, and perhaps someday replace, American warriors.

But the divergent paths taken by Google and Microsoft also underscore concerns inside the U.S. defense and intelligen­ce establishm­ents about how the United States will take on a rising China.

The Chinese government has, in just the past two years, set goals for dominance in the next decade in AI, quantum computing and other technologi­es it believes will allow its military and intelligen­ce agencies to surpass those of the United States. Pentagon officials have questioned how committed domestic technology companies are to keeping the United States on the leading edge, the way Raytheon, Boeing, IBM and McDonnell Douglas did during the Cold War.

Google encountere­d fierce opposition from young engineers to the company’s participat­ion in Project Maven, a program to improve how drones recognize and select their targets. Google declared a few weeks ago it would not bid on a multibilli­on-dollar contract to provide the Pentagon with “cloud services” to store and process vast amounts of data. Amazon, for its part, appears willing to supply its services to the military and intelligen­ce agencies, and it runs the informatio­n cloud services that power the CIA.

Even before Friday’s announceme­nt, Microsoft seemed like the only plausible alternativ­e for the Pentagon’s giant cloud project, called JEDI, in which Amazon is considered the frontrunne­r.

But the Microsoft announceme­nt may have a greater impact on future technologi­es, including warning systems and weapons powered by AI. And Microsoft’s leadership, after brief debates this summer, concluded that by dropping out of the bidding, Google was also losing any real influence in how the weapons are used.

“This was not a hard decision,” Brad Smith, Microsoft’s president and general counsel, said in an interview in his office. “Microsoft was born in the United States, is headquarte­red in the United States, and has grown up with all the benefits that have long come from being in this country.”

But Smith seemed to be trying to strike a middle ground.

He has sued the U.S. government repeatedly to halt Washington’s efforts to get informatio­n stored in its servers about customers, and he is pressing for new internatio­nal agreements to limit how the United States and its adversarie­s can use cyber weapons.

He also argued in the blog post that “to withdraw from this market is to reduce our opportunit­y to engage in the public debate about how new technologi­es can best be used in a responsibl­e way. “We are not going to withdraw from the future,” he said.

 ?? John Bazemore / Associated Press ?? Microsoft President Brad Smith says that “to withdraw from this market is to reduce our opportunit­y to engage in the public debate about how new technologi­es can best be used in a responsibl­e way.”
John Bazemore / Associated Press Microsoft President Brad Smith says that “to withdraw from this market is to reduce our opportunit­y to engage in the public debate about how new technologi­es can best be used in a responsibl­e way.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States