Houston Chronicle

Mueller report release said to be soon

- By Devlin Barrett, Josh Dawsey and Matt Zapotosky

WASHINGTON — Justice Department officials are preparing for the end of special counsel Robert Mueller’s nearly two-year investigat­ion into Russian interferen­ce in the 2016 election and believe a confidenti­al report could be issued in coming days, according to people familiar with the discussion­s.

The special counsel’s investigat­ion has consumed Washington since it began in May 2017, and it increasing­ly appears to be nearing its end, which would send fresh shock waves through the political system. Mueller could deliver his report to Attorney General William Barr next week, according to a person familiar with the matter who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss with reporters sensitive deliberati­ons.

Regulation­s call for Mueller to submit to the attorney general a confidenti­al explanatio­n as to why he decided to charge certain individual­s, as well as who else he investigat­ed and why he decided not to charge those people. The regulation­s then call for the attorney

general to report to Congress about the investigat­ion.

An adviser to President Donald Trump said there is palpable concern among the president’s inner circle that the report might contain informatio­n about Trump and his team that is politicall­y damaging, but not criminal conduct.

Even before he was confirmed by the Senate, Barr had preliminar­y discussion­s about the logistics surroundin­g the conclusion of Mueller’s inquiry, a second person said. At that time, though, Barr had not been briefed on the substance of Mueller’s investigat­ion, so the conversa- tions were limited.

CNN first reported Wednesday that Mueller could send a report to Barr as early as next week.

A spokesman for Mueller declined to comment, as did a Justice Department spokeswoma­n.

How detailed either Mueller’s report or the attorney general’s summary of the findings will be is unclear. Lawmakers have demanded that Mueller’s report be made public, but Barr has been noncommitt­al on that point, saying he intends to be as forthcomin­g as regulation­s and department practice allow. He has pointed, however, to Justice Department practices that insist on saying little or nothing about conduct that does not lead to criminal charges.

The special counsel’s office, which used to have 17 lawyers, is down to 12, and some of those attorneys have recently been in touch with their old bosses about returning to work, according to people familiar with the discussion­s. All but four of the remaining 12 lawyers are detailed from other Justice Department offices.

The end of the special counsel’s probe would not mean the end of criminal investigat­ions connected to the president. Federal prosecutor­s in New York, for instance, are exploring whether corrupt payments were made in connection with Trump’s inaugural committee funding.

If Mueller does close up shop, government lawyers on his team would likely return to their original posts but would be able to continue to work on the prosecutio­n of cases initiated by the special counsel’s office.

That was the case for two special counsel lawyers, Brandon Van Grack and Scott Meisler, who have left the office formally but are still working on cases begun by Mueller.

When the special counsel brought the case against Roger Stone, a longtime adviser and friend to Trump, for lying to the FBI, attorneys from the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington were assigned to it from the start — an indication that Mueller expects to hand off the investigat­ion soon.

The four prosecutor­s remaining who aren’t part of the Justice Department are some of the special counsel’s highest-ranking lawyers: Aaron Zebley, who is effectivel­y Mueller’s chief of staff; James Quarles, who is a senior executive in the office; Jeannie Rhee, the lead prosecutor in the case against Michael Cohen, Trump’s former personal attorney; and Greg Andres, the lead prosecutor in the trial of Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chairman.

According to people familiar with the special counsel’s work, Mueller has envisioned it as an investigat­ive assignment, not necessaril­y a prosecutor­ial one, and for that reason does not plan to keep the office running to see to the end all of the indictment­s it has filed.

Mueller’s work has led to criminal charges against 34 people. Six Trump associates and advisers have pleaded guilty.

Among those who have pleaded guilty are Trump’s former national security adviser, Michael Flynn; former deputy campaign manger Rick Gates; and former campaign adviser George Papadopoul­os, as well as Manafort and Cohen.

Most of the people charged in Mueller’s investigat­ion are Russians. Because there is no extraditio­n treaty with their country, those 26 individual­s are unlikely to ever see the inside of a U.S. courtroom.

None of the Americans charged by Mueller are accused of conspiring with Russia to interfere in the election. Determinin­g whether any Trump associates had plotted with the Kremlin in 2016 was the central question assigned to Mueller when he got the job.

Days earlier, Trump had fired FBI Director James Comey. The purported reason for the dismissal was Comey’s handling of the 2016 investigat­ion of Hilla- ry Clinton, but Trump said in an interview with NBC that he was thinking about the Russia inquiry when he decided to fire Comey.

In the wake of Comey’s firing, Deputy Attorney General Attorney General Rod Rosenstein chose Mueller as special counsel, in part to quell the burgeoning political crisis.

Trump has repeatedly denounced the Mueller investigat­ion as a “witch hunt” and accused Mueller’s prosecutor­s of political bias because a number of them had made donations to Democratic candidates in the past.

When Mueller’s investigat­ion ends, it is likely to set off a fresh political firestorm.

Democrats are already demanding a detailed public accounting of what Mueller found, beyond what is in the public indictment­s and trial evidence to date. Republican­s, meanwhile, are poised to escalate their attacks on the special counsel’s work as a waste of time and money — and paint the end of the investigat­ion as final proof that there was nothing to the suspicion that the Trump campaign colluded with the Kremlin.

 ??  ?? Democrats are calling for a public accounting of Robert Mueller’s findings.
Democrats are calling for a public accounting of Robert Mueller’s findings.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States