Houston Chronicle

Pain doctors face backlog in transition to new pads

Pharmacy board’s policy leads to a delay in orders for 600 prescripti­on forms

- By Natalie Weber STAFF WRITER

When Roy Kauffman, a 73-year-old Kerrville resident, went down to his local CVS to get his pain medication refilled earlier this month, it took about a week and four exchanges between his doctor’s office and the CVS before he finally got his medicine.

The issue? His prescripti­on was written on an old form.

The Texas State Board of Pharmacy mandates that all official prescripti­on forms for Schedule II drugs that were filled out by doctors on or after June 1 must have been ordered on or after Sept. 1, 2018, in order to be valid. According to the board of pharmacy website, “Schedule II drugs include certain narcotic, stimulant and depressant drugs.”

Doctors say the policy has resulted in a backlog for ordering the new forms, and some have said they’ve had to wait months to receive the new forms.

“I was concerned I was probably going to have to wait until that new pad arrived at the doctor’s office,” Kauffman said.

A CVS employee, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the issue, said standard practice is that prescripti­on forms must be post-dated. He did not, however, specifical­ly address Kauffman’s experience.

Kauffman’s physician, Dr. Ralph Menard, ordered the new prescripti­on pads on March 1 — three months before physi

cians would have to begin using them. Still, he didn’t receive them until June 6, a few days after the policy had already taken effect.

“They knew how many doctors needed those prescripti­on (pads) and why they didn’t print more, I don’t know,” Menard said.

Allison Benz, executive director of the Texas State Board of Pharmacy, said the unfilled orders may be partly due to people being unaware of the changes. However, she said they are mainly the result of people forgetting to provide all of the verificati­on informatio­n for their orders.

If prescriber­s want to ship the pads to the address on their driver’s license, they must provide a photocopy of their driver’s license. The process of ordering prescripti­on pads also requires a provider’s valid DEA number and Social Security number.

“If we have all the verificati­on informatio­n, it’s about a four-week turnaround,” Benz said.

For orders without proper identifica­tion, arrival time depends on when prescriber­s provide their informatio­n.

“We can’t just process it like you’re ordering something off of Amazon,” Benz said, stressing the importance of verifying orders.

Why new pads are needed

The purpose of the new forms is to increase security through four features: a unique control number for each form, a pantograph security feature to protect against photocopie­s, a thermochro­mic red Rx and two watermarks. Prescripti­on pads are also now sold in packs of 50 instead of 100 as an additional security measure.

Benz said the pharmacy board had about 600 orders that had not been fulfilled by the end of May because physicians hadn’t sent a photocopy of their driver’s license.

“It sounds like a lot, but it’s actually a pretty small (part) of the total we’ve received,” she said.

Since Sept. 1, the board has received about 30,000 orders for Schedule II prescripti­on pads, Benz said.

While the State Board of Pharmacy works to fulfill orders for the new forms, pharmacist­s have been directed to use their “profession­al judgment” with regard to prescripti­on forms printed before Sept. 1, Benz said. If the form is otherwise valid, pharmacist­s “may, if they want to, dispense the prescripti­on,” she said.

If a pharmacist rejects the old prescripti­on form, however, waiting for a refill can be debilitati­ng for patients.

Kauffman said he has been taking hydrocodon­e acetaminop­hen since April to manage hip and back pain. After back surgery in February, he said he developed a urinary tract infection that spread to his hips and he needs his medication to fully manage the pain.

“If I want to do any walking at all, I have to take one,” he said.

As physicians adjust to the new forms, the Texas Medical Associatio­n has been working to aid them in the process.

For about the past five months, the associatio­n has received between three and five calls daily from physicians who have questions regarding the new policy, said Marcus Cooper, the medical associatio­n’s multimedia manager.

“It’s been frustratin­g for some doctors because the new Schedule II forms that they’re trying to get ready have been delayed,” he said.

The Texas Medical Associatio­n has been advocating changes it believes will help physicians transition to the new forms. The group has asked the Texas State Board of Pharmacy to list the driver’s license requiremen­t on the first page for its online order form in addition to the note listed on the webpage that directs to the online order form.

The associatio­n has also supported House Bill 3284. This bill — which was signed by Gov. Greg Abbott on June 14 — gives doctors more time to set up an account with the Texas Prescripti­on Monitoring Program, pushing the deadline from Sept. 1, 2019, to March 1, 2020.

“We’re available to answer questions … and we’ll be working with physicians to hear their concerns and also share their concerns with the board of pharmacy,” Cooper said.

The Texas Medical Associatio­n has been encouragin­g doctors to look into implementi­ng electronic prescribin­g while they wait for the new forms.

Dr. Matthias Wiederholz, with Performanc­e Pain & Sports Medicine, said the new policy has had little effect on his practice, as he has long used electronic prescribin­g. He noted, however, that this may not be the case for all physicians.

“I think if you’re a doctor that doesn’t do electronic prescribin­g, it’s going to be a very impactful issue,” he said.

More changes coming

But that alternativ­e may not be viable for all clinics.

Dr. Irvin Sulapas, a Baylor physician who works in sports and family medicine, ordered the new prescripti­on forms in late February and received them about eight weeks later. But he said e-prescribin­g can help clinics continue their normal operations while waiting for paper forms.

“That’s an option if the practice allows that, but for small private practices, the ability to send these prescripti­ons electronic­ally may be too expensive,” he said.

But electronic prescribin­g will soon be required for all controlled substances, beginning Jan. 21, 2021, thanks to House Bill 2174, which was signed into law by Abbott this month. Still, the bill allows waivers for “economic hardship,” “technologi­cal limitation­s not reasonably within the control of the prescriber” or “other exceptiona­l circumstan­ces demonstrat­ed by the prescriber.”

The bill also includes a few other exceptions, including when veterinari­ans prescribe controlled substances. Pharmacist­s will be allowed to continue dispensing “an otherwise valid written, oral, or telephonic­ally communicat­ed prescripti­on,” and will not be required to confirm “the prescripti­on is exempt from the requiremen­t that it be submitted electronic­ally.”

Dr. C.M. Schade, former president of the Texas Pain Society, said the organizati­on has been pushing for a switch to e-prescribin­g to head off counterfei­t forms, as well as to address issues such as the recent backlog in ordering forms. The state has been using some type of print prescripti­on form since 1981, he said.

“It’s archaic and we need to eliminate it,” he said.

 ?? Photos by Bob Owen / Staff photograph­er ?? Roy Kauffman, of Kerrville, takes medication for post-surgery pain, but a rule change delayed his prescripti­on for about a week.
Photos by Bob Owen / Staff photograph­er Roy Kauffman, of Kerrville, takes medication for post-surgery pain, but a rule change delayed his prescripti­on for about a week.
 ??  ?? “If I want to do any walking at all, I have to take one,” Kauffman said of his hydrocodon­e prescripti­on for a surgery in February.
“If I want to do any walking at all, I have to take one,” Kauffman said of his hydrocodon­e prescripti­on for a surgery in February.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States