District B candidate suing to boot rival
Lawsuit filed amid runoff race over felony conviction
A city council candidate who finished third in the District B election has filed a lawsuit seeking to kick the second-place finisher off the December runoff ballot due to a prior felony conviction.
Renee JeffersonSmith, who trailed Cynthia Bailey by 168 votes in unofficial returns, sued the city of Houston and Harris County Thursday, contending that Bailey’s 2007 conviction for theft of over $200,000 makes her ineligible to appear on the ballot.
The Texas Election Code says candidates are eligible to run for office if they have not been “finally convicted” of a felony from which they have “not been pardoned or otherwise released from the resulting disabilities,” though the law does not define “resulting disabilities.”
In the state district court lawsuit, which seeks an injunction and temporary restraining order to bar Bailey from appearing on the ballot, Jefferson-Smith also argued that Bailey may have com
mitted perjury by affirming in her candidacy application that she had not been convicted of a felony.
Though the law appears to prohibit convicted felons from seeking office, candidates with felony records successfully have reached the ballot in Houston, Austin and San Antonio, and the law has yet to be thoroughly tested in court.
For now, Bailey is set to face Tarsha Jackson in the District B runoff. The district, which covers several north Houston neighborhoods including Fifth Ward and Acres Homes, currently is represented by term-limited Councilman Jerry Davis. Jackson finished atop the 14-candidate field with 20.8 percent of the vote in Tuesday’s election.
Bailey secured 14.5 percent, while Jefferson-Smith trailed close behind with 13.4 percent. The race will be decided in a Dec. 14 runoff because none of the candidates received a majority of the votes.
Bailey, through a spokesperson, declined comment Friday.
In the petition filed Thursday, Jefferson-Smith also contended that Bailey’s criminal record “will guarantee a victory for the other runoff candidate and deny voters in District B a real choice.”
Replacing Bailey in the runoff, Jefferson-Smith argued, would give voters “the opportunity to choose between two eligible candidates for the position of councilmember for District B, thus ensuring that District B voters are not disenfranchised.”
Jefferson-Smith declined comment through a spokesperson, though she posted about the lawsuit on Facebook Thursday.
“I had a decision to make, and believe me it was extremely tough, so please understand; this lawsuit and fight is not about me, it’s about the people in District B,” she wrote.
Jackson said she was disappointed Jefferson-Smith filed the lawsuit, and argued that Bailey should not be kept off the ballot.
“I’ve spent my whole life fighting for criminal justice reform and fighting for people to have a second chance. All the candidates knew she had a criminal record when the story came out,” Jackson said, referring to a Chronicle story published last month. “She finished second despite the story, and I think she should be able to finish the race.”
The lawsuit, Jackson added, “brings division within a community that’s ready to move forward. I hope it gets resolved quickly.”