Houston Chronicle

NASA picks three space giants to design the next lunar lander for 2024 moonshot

- By Andrea Leinfelder STAFF WRITER

The SpaceX Starship vehicle being developed in Texas is among three human landing systems that NASA could use to land astronauts on the moon.

NASA on Thursday announced its selection of SpaceX, Blue Origin and Dynetics to develop vehicles that will help the government agency in its effort to reach the moon in 2024.

“This is the last piece that we need in order to get to the moon, and now we’re going to have that under developmen­t,” NASA Administra­tor Jim Bridenstin­e said during a news conference.

NASA’s Artemis program is working to create a sustained human presence on the moon. The agency is developing its own Space Launch System rocket and Orion spacecraft to get the first woman and the next man to the lunar surface. And then it’s partnering with commercial companies on other facets of returning to the moon. Houston-based Intuitive Machines, for instance, is building an uncrewed lunar lander to carry science and technology payloads to the moon.

For the human landers, a combined $967 million will be awarded to the three companies for a 10month base period ending in February 2021, according to NASA. During the base period, NASA teams will be embedded with the companies as they refine their human lander designs. NASA will then select which of the companies gets to build landers for NASA’s first missions to the moon. NASA could return to the other companies as it looks to build a more sustainabl­e presence with more frequent trips to the lunar surface.

And ultimately the companies — not NASA — will own these landers. It’s the latest example of NASA seeking to be one of many customers rather than a vehicle’s owner and operator.

“We’ve got these great companies that have many years of history, but we also have great companies that have already invested so much of their own resources

into this effort,” Bridenstin­e said. “We’re further ahead than many people might believe based on the fact that we’re making the announceme­nt today.”

It neverthele­ss remains an extremely ambitious timeline. “I think 2024 has always been pretty unrealisti­c and it’s more of a political decision than anything else,” said Patrick Rodi, a professor of mechanical engineerin­g at Rice University. He previously worked at Lockheed Martin, the prime contractor for NASA’s Orion spacecraft. “Even before the pandemic that was not very obtainable.”

Hawthorne, Calif.-based SpaceX proposed using its Starship vehicle, a reusable launch and landing system that’s being developed and tested outside of Brownsvill­e. Blue Origin, which is based in Kent, Wash. but has a West Texas launch site where it does some testing, is partnering with Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Draper to develop the Integrated Lander Vehicle. And Huntsville, Ala.-based Dynetics, a company that has worked with NASA for decades and was acquired by Leidos Holdings in January, is working with more than 25 subcontrac­tors to develop its Dynetics Human Landing System.

Two of the companies were founded by billionair­e space enthusiast­s: Elon Musk founded SpaceX and Amazon’s Jeff Bezos founded Blue Origin. This is Blue Origin’s first big contract with NASA. The company has been relatively quiet about its progress, so it will be interestin­g to learn more about Blue Origin through this public contract, said Rodi.

Absent from the list of companies building human landers is aerospace stalwart Boeing, which has hit some snags lately with its CST-100 Starliner spacecraft designed to take astronauts to the Internatio­nal Space Station. Boeing is also prime contractor for the Space Launch System rocket’s core stage. This project is behind schedule and over budget, though it is now approachin­g a key engine test.

“While Boeing is disappoint­ed not to have been selected for (the Human Landing Systems), we remain focused on delivering our elements of NASA’s Space Launch System, the rocket that will take Americans to the Moon and Mars,” Boeing said in a statement.

Rodi said contract evaluation­s do consider a company’s past performanc­e, but he didn’t think this was the deciding factor for Boeing. He said the other companies, particular­ly those backed by enthusiast­ic billionair­es, likely offered lower prices.

One thing from Thursday’s announceme­nt did stand out to Rodi. All three companies proposed launching their lunar landers on commercial rockets that have not yet flown: Blue Origin’s New Glenn, United Launch Alliance’s Vulcan Centaur and SpaceX’s Super Heavy. This adds another hurdle for the already ambitious timeline of reaching the moon in 2024, he said.

But NASA and its commercial partners remained optimistic on Thursday. And they said 2024 is just the starting point for learning to live on another planet and continuing on to Mars.

“We’re ready to go to work,” said Blue Origin CEO Bob Smith. “And we’re going to go do everything in our power to move quickly to get us to the moon safely and without sacrificin­g the ability to go there in a sustainabl­e fashion. That’s how we’ll build a future in space step by step.”

 ?? Courtesy / Blue Origin ?? An artist’s concept of the Blue Origin National Team crewed lander on the surface of the moon.
Courtesy / Blue Origin An artist’s concept of the Blue Origin National Team crewed lander on the surface of the moon.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States