Houston Chronicle

Study: People testing positive after healing aren’t infectious

- By Heesu Lee and Jason Gale

Researcher­s are finding evidence that patients who test positive for the coronaviru­s after recovering aren’t capable of transmitti­ng the infection and could have the antibodies that prevent them from falling sick again.

Scientists from the Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention studied 285 COVID-19 survivors who had tested positive for the coronaviru­s after their illness had apparently resolved, as indicated by a previous negative test result. The so-called re-positive patients weren’t found to have spread any lingering infection, and virus samples collected from them couldn’t be grown in culture, indicating patients were shedding noninfecti­ous or dead virus particles.

The findings, reported late Monday, are a positive sign for regions looking to open up as more patients recover from the global pandemic that has sickened at least 4.8 million people. The emerging evidence from South Korea suggests those who have recovered from COVID-19 present no risk of spreading the coronaviru­s when physical distancing measures are relaxed.

The results mean health authoritie­s in South Korea will no longer consider people infectious after recovering from the illness. Research last month showed that so-called polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests for the coronaviru­s’ nucleic acid can’t distinguis­h between dead and viable virus particles, potentiall­y giving the wrong impression that someone who tests positive for the virus remains infectious.

The research may also aid in the debate over antibody tests, which look for markers in the blood that indicate exposure to the novel coronaviru­s. Experts believe antibodies probably convey some level of protection against the virus, but they don’t have any solid proof yet. Nor do they know how long any immunity may last.

A recent study in Singapore showed recovered patients from severe acute respirator­y syndrome (SARS) are found to have “significan­t levels of neutralizi­ng antibodies” nine to 17 years after initial infection, according to researcher­s including Danielle Anderson of Duke-NUS Medical School.

Other scientists have found higher levels of IgM, an antibody that appears in response to exposure to an antigen, in children, according to an article published on medRxiv. That suggests younger population­s have the potential to produce a more potent defense against COVID-19. The study has not been certified by peer review.

As a result of the findings in the South Korea study, authoritie­s said that under revised protocols, people should no longer be required to test negative for the virus before returning to work or school after they have recovered from their illness and completed their period of isolation.

“Under the new protocols, no additional tests are required for cases that have been discharged from isolation,” the Korean CDC said in a report. The agency said it will now refer to “re-positive” cases as “PCR re-detected after discharge from isolation.”

Some coronaviru­s patients have tested positive again for the virus up to 82 days after becoming infected. Almost all of the cases for which blood tests were taken had antibodies against the virus.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States