Houston Chronicle

Biden proposes more fed testing involvemen­t

- By Sheryl Gay Stolberg

WASHINGTON — Joe Biden has proposed harnessing the broad powers of the federal government to step up coronaviru­s testing, with a public-private board overseeing test manufactur­ing and distributi­on, federal safety regulators enforcing testing at work and at least 100,000 contact tracers tracking down people exposed to the virus.

The presumptiv­e Democratic presidenti­al nominee’s plan, laid out in a little-noticed Medium post, stands in stark contrast to President Donald Trump’s leaveit-to-the-states strategy, detailed in a document released last weekend. And it presents voters in November with a classic philosophi­cal choice over the role they want Washington to play during the worst public health crisis in a century.

With more than 100,000 Americans already dead from the coronaviru­s and at least 1.7 million infected, testing has emerged as a major campaign issue. Polls show that most people want better access to testing and believe that it is the job of the federal government. Like Biden, Democrats running for Congress have seized on testing as a prime example of what they view as Trump’s incompeten­t response to the crisis.

In Michigan, Sen. Gary Peters, an incumbent Democrat, tells viewers in a TV ad that “our workplaces need to be safe” and “that means more testing.” In Colorado, an ad for Sen. Cory Gardner, an incumbent Republican, begins with footage of a news anchor saying, “Coronaviru­s tests are coming to Colorado from South Korea because of Sen. Cory Gardner.”

In Maine, Sara Gideon, a Democrat running to unseat Sen. Susan Collins, says in an ad that “the federal government needs to expand testing, which is critical to keeping us safe.” In Washington, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi held a news conference Tuesday to attack the Trump plan as insufficie­nt.

“Mr. President, take responsibi­lity,” Pelosi said, adding, “That’s what the president of the United States is supposed to do.”

Beyond the slogans and congressio­nal calls for a national testing strategy, Biden’s plan, laid out late last month as he struggled to grab voters’ attention, begins to flesh out such a strategy.

Harking back to the War Production Board created during World War II by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, Biden proposed a “Pandemic Testing Board” to oversee “a nationwide campaign” to increase production of diagnostic and antibody tests, coordinate distributi­on, identify testing sites and people to staff them, and build laboratory capacity.

Testing, he and his advisers wrote, “is the springboar­d we need to help get our economy safely up and running again.”

Campaign advisers say Biden said he would do what the Obama administra­tion did during the H1N1 pandemic of 2009: Instruct the Occupation­al Safety and Health Administra­tion, which regulates workplace safety, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to issue detailed guidance for how employers should protect their workers, including testing. OSHA would enforce compliance.

Under Trump, OSHA has issued COVID-19 guidance for employers that is “advisory in nature and informatio­nal in content” and does not mention testing. The CDC’s interim guidance for employers says only that companies “should not require a COVID-19 test result” or a doctor’s note to grant sick leave or to determine whether employees can return.

Biden would also create a new federal entity: The U.S. Public Health Jobs Corps, a force of at least 100,000 people, including AmeriCorps and Peace Corps volunteers and laid-off workers, to trace the contacts of those who test positive for the virus. It would also “become the permanent foundation” of a service that would address other public health priorities such as the opioid epidemic.

Republican­s argue in favor of a more localized response led by state government­s. “With support from the federal government to ensure states are meeting goals, the state plans for testing will advance the safe opening of America,” says the Trump administra­tion’s COVID-19 Strategic Testing Plan, prepared by the Health and Human Services Department.

Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, called Biden’s idea a “typical Democratic response.”

“There’s a big difference between what’s going on in Queens,

N.Y., and rural Tennessee, and the governors know best what to do,” he said, adding, “Every time you have a national problem, whether it’s education or health, the instinct of Democrats is to say, ‘Let’s solve it from Washington,’ and my instinct and that of Republican­s is that this is a country that works state by state, community by community.”

Some public health experts, including those who advise the Biden campaign and some who do not, say that is a false dichotomy. The federal government could and should cooperate with and support the states, and also take a more aggressive role, they say, particular­ly in a chaotic environmen­t where a global shortage has left governors — and now employers — competing for scant supplies of test kits and wondering how best to use them.

“Every university, every employer, every organizati­on is struggling to figure out how to use testing to create a safe environmen­t,” said David Kessler, a Biden campaign adviser who was the Food and Drug Administra­tion commission­er under Presidents George Bush and Bill Clinton.

“If you’re Amazon,” he added, “you can hire people to put in place testing systems to help assure the safety of your workforce, but not everyone can do that. Why are we reinventin­g this firm by firm, school by school, employer by employer?”

Congress required Trump to provide a national testing strategy in the $484 billion stimulus package it passed last month and required the states to submit plans to the federal government for approval. But Democrats on Capitol Hill say the strategy the Trump administra­tion offered over the weekend falls far short.

Polls show that voters tend to favor a prominent role for the federal government. In a Pew Research survey released this month, 61 percent of Americans said testing was mostly or entirely the responsibi­lity of the federal government, not the states.

A Fox News poll released last week found that 63 percent of registered voters viewed the “lack of available testing” as a “major problem.” Just 12 percent said it was not a problem at all. Voters said they trusted Biden to do a better job on health care than Trump by a 17-point margin and favored Biden on the handling of the pandemic by nine points over Trump.

While Trump has repeatedly said anyone who wants a test can get one, that is not true in many parts of the country. It is true in Tennessee, where Gov. Bill Lee, a Republican, has decided that the state will pay for testing. “When in doubt, get a test,” he said on his Facebook page, adding, “Aggressive testing is key to our reopening strategy.”

And while Trump has emphasized the number of people who have been tested — more than 15 million Americans, as of Monday — experts say the more important metrics are what percentage of the population has been tested, what percentage of tests come back positive and how those tests are deployed.

“Instead of focusing on what we need to do as a country to keep ourselves and our population­s and especially our vulnerable people safe, and saying let’s come up with the right testing strategy and make sure we have enough tests to implement it, we’ve just been fighting about the number of tests,” said Ashish Jha, director of the Harvard Global Health Institute.

 ?? New York Times file photo ?? A plan from Joe Biden, shown with his wife, Jill, would create a new federal entity, the U.S. Public Health Jobs Corps, to trace the contacts of those who test positive for the coronaviru­s.
New York Times file photo A plan from Joe Biden, shown with his wife, Jill, would create a new federal entity, the U.S. Public Health Jobs Corps, to trace the contacts of those who test positive for the coronaviru­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States