Houston Chronicle

Native American rights get big boost in court

- By Adam Liptak and Jack Healy

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that much of eastern Oklahoma falls within an Indian reservatio­n, a decision that could reshape the criminal justice system by preventing state authoritie­s from prosecutin­g offenses there that involve Native Americans.

The 5-to-4 decision, potentiall­y one of the most consequent­ial legal victories for Native Americans in decades, could have farreachin­g implicatio­ns for the people who live across what the court affirmed was Indian Country.

The lands include much of Tulsa, Oklahoma’s second-biggest city.

The case was steeped in the U.S. government’s long history of brutal removals and broken treaties with Indigenous tribes and grappled with whether lands of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation had remained a reservatio­n after Oklahoma became a state.

The decision puts in doubt hundreds of state conviction­s of Native Americans and could change the handling of prosecutio­ns across much of the state.

Lawyers also were examining whether it had broader implicatio­ns for taxing, zoning and other government functions.

Many of the specific impacts will be determined by negotiatio­ns between state and federal authoritie­s and five Native American tribes in Oklahoma.

Justice Neil Gorsuch, a Westerner who has sided with tribes in previous cases and joined the court’s more liberal members to form the majority, said Congress had granted the Creek a reservatio­n and that the United States needed to abide by its promises.

“Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservatio­n for purposes of federal criminal law,” Gorsuch wrote in the majority opinion. “Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word.”

Muscogee leaders said the tribe will work with state and federal law enforcemen­t authoritie­s to coordinate public safety within the reservatio­n.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States